Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Chamberlin’s latest gem
- This topic has 80 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by
cr.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 7, 2008 at 5:51 PM #12025March 7, 2008 at 6:10 PM #165807
bsrsharma
ParticipantIt is probably no secret; George Chamberlin is weak in anything more than 5th grade math. During his “Money in the Morning” radio days, anything involving two ratios or percentages used to confound him. He just couldn’t grasp the notion of ratio of ratios – atleast on realtime radio. A caller would call him with a question like this and he would be lost trying to figure what to use for numerator and denominator. Not funny on radio!
March 7, 2008 at 6:10 PM #166222ParticipantIt is probably no secret; George Chamberlin is weak in anything more than 5th grade math. During his “Money in the Morning” radio days, anything involving two ratios or percentages used to confound him. He just couldn’t grasp the notion of ratio of ratios – atleast on realtime radio. A caller would call him with a question like this and he would be lost trying to figure what to use for numerator and denominator. Not funny on radio!
March 7, 2008 at 6:10 PM #166134ParticipantIt is probably no secret; George Chamberlin is weak in anything more than 5th grade math. During his “Money in the Morning” radio days, anything involving two ratios or percentages used to confound him. He just couldn’t grasp the notion of ratio of ratios – atleast on realtime radio. A caller would call him with a question like this and he would be lost trying to figure what to use for numerator and denominator. Not funny on radio!
March 7, 2008 at 6:10 PM #166130ParticipantIt is probably no secret; George Chamberlin is weak in anything more than 5th grade math. During his “Money in the Morning” radio days, anything involving two ratios or percentages used to confound him. He just couldn’t grasp the notion of ratio of ratios – atleast on realtime radio. A caller would call him with a question like this and he would be lost trying to figure what to use for numerator and denominator. Not funny on radio!
March 7, 2008 at 6:10 PM #166123ParticipantIt is probably no secret; George Chamberlin is weak in anything more than 5th grade math. During his “Money in the Morning” radio days, anything involving two ratios or percentages used to confound him. He just couldn’t grasp the notion of ratio of ratios – atleast on realtime radio. A caller would call him with a question like this and he would be lost trying to figure what to use for numerator and denominator. Not funny on radio!
March 7, 2008 at 6:19 PM #166155equalizer
ParticipantHow much stock market wealth has evaporated this year, bubblesipper?
Try min. of 1.5Trillion dollars. Add in minimum of -1% a month for home equity and we are talking real money.March 7, 2008 at 6:19 PM #166242ParticipantHow much stock market wealth has evaporated this year, bubblesipper?
Try min. of 1.5Trillion dollars. Add in minimum of -1% a month for home equity and we are talking real money.March 7, 2008 at 6:19 PM #166151ParticipantHow much stock market wealth has evaporated this year, bubblesipper?
Try min. of 1.5Trillion dollars. Add in minimum of -1% a month for home equity and we are talking real money.March 7, 2008 at 6:19 PM #166143ParticipantHow much stock market wealth has evaporated this year, bubblesipper?
Try min. of 1.5Trillion dollars. Add in minimum of -1% a month for home equity and we are talking real money.March 7, 2008 at 6:19 PM #165826ParticipantHow much stock market wealth has evaporated this year, bubblesipper?
Try min. of 1.5Trillion dollars. Add in minimum of -1% a month for home equity and we are talking real money.March 7, 2008 at 6:40 PM #166262davelj
Participant“Faced with the choice between changing one’s mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.” – John Kenneth Galbraith
That pretty much sums up George Chamberlin’s views on real estate and the economy.
March 7, 2008 at 6:40 PM #165846Participant“Faced with the choice between changing one’s mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.” – John Kenneth Galbraith
That pretty much sums up George Chamberlin’s views on real estate and the economy.
March 7, 2008 at 6:40 PM #166163Participant“Faced with the choice between changing one’s mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.” – John Kenneth Galbraith
That pretty much sums up George Chamberlin’s views on real estate and the economy.
March 7, 2008 at 6:40 PM #166171Participant“Faced with the choice between changing one’s mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.” – John Kenneth Galbraith
That pretty much sums up George Chamberlin’s views on real estate and the economy.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.