- This topic has 232 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 11, 2007 at 9:00 AM #10881November 11, 2007 at 9:40 AM #98353PorkmanDelardoParticipant
As the article explains, low income/first time homebuyers qualify with the assistance of patchwork of fixed rate loans and grants. Much of the loans are silent loans that will never have to be paid back if the home-owner meets certain requirements. The loans and grants can bring the actual loan balance close to 50% of the purchase price, hence a payment on on a loan of approx $150,000. Also included in the package is assistance with property taxes etc. Loan rates are typically lower to make the loans more affordable. So the month to month carrying costs are actually much lower than what appears on the surface. Getting qualified and going thru the process can be arduous, but the trade-off is well worth it. San Diego needs more affordable housing and more programs. Porkman
November 11, 2007 at 9:40 AM #98418PorkmanDelardoParticipantAs the article explains, low income/first time homebuyers qualify with the assistance of patchwork of fixed rate loans and grants. Much of the loans are silent loans that will never have to be paid back if the home-owner meets certain requirements. The loans and grants can bring the actual loan balance close to 50% of the purchase price, hence a payment on on a loan of approx $150,000. Also included in the package is assistance with property taxes etc. Loan rates are typically lower to make the loans more affordable. So the month to month carrying costs are actually much lower than what appears on the surface. Getting qualified and going thru the process can be arduous, but the trade-off is well worth it. San Diego needs more affordable housing and more programs. Porkman
November 11, 2007 at 9:40 AM #98428PorkmanDelardoParticipantAs the article explains, low income/first time homebuyers qualify with the assistance of patchwork of fixed rate loans and grants. Much of the loans are silent loans that will never have to be paid back if the home-owner meets certain requirements. The loans and grants can bring the actual loan balance close to 50% of the purchase price, hence a payment on on a loan of approx $150,000. Also included in the package is assistance with property taxes etc. Loan rates are typically lower to make the loans more affordable. So the month to month carrying costs are actually much lower than what appears on the surface. Getting qualified and going thru the process can be arduous, but the trade-off is well worth it. San Diego needs more affordable housing and more programs. Porkman
November 11, 2007 at 9:40 AM #98436PorkmanDelardoParticipantAs the article explains, low income/first time homebuyers qualify with the assistance of patchwork of fixed rate loans and grants. Much of the loans are silent loans that will never have to be paid back if the home-owner meets certain requirements. The loans and grants can bring the actual loan balance close to 50% of the purchase price, hence a payment on on a loan of approx $150,000. Also included in the package is assistance with property taxes etc. Loan rates are typically lower to make the loans more affordable. So the month to month carrying costs are actually much lower than what appears on the surface. Getting qualified and going thru the process can be arduous, but the trade-off is well worth it. San Diego needs more affordable housing and more programs. Porkman
November 11, 2007 at 10:06 AM #98361blackboxParticipantCurrently, this program is a waste of tax payers money, because it puts an artificial floor on home prices. These homes should be priced at around 150k to start with. Its sad to have our money keep this prices out of reach of people who actually don’t qualify for these programs. Let the system work inself out, and low income people with our tax payer money will be able to qualify for a much better home, and those above the minimum to qualify will be able to find something affortable quicker.
November 11, 2007 at 10:06 AM #98425blackboxParticipantCurrently, this program is a waste of tax payers money, because it puts an artificial floor on home prices. These homes should be priced at around 150k to start with. Its sad to have our money keep this prices out of reach of people who actually don’t qualify for these programs. Let the system work inself out, and low income people with our tax payer money will be able to qualify for a much better home, and those above the minimum to qualify will be able to find something affortable quicker.
November 11, 2007 at 10:06 AM #98434blackboxParticipantCurrently, this program is a waste of tax payers money, because it puts an artificial floor on home prices. These homes should be priced at around 150k to start with. Its sad to have our money keep this prices out of reach of people who actually don’t qualify for these programs. Let the system work inself out, and low income people with our tax payer money will be able to qualify for a much better home, and those above the minimum to qualify will be able to find something affortable quicker.
November 11, 2007 at 10:06 AM #98443blackboxParticipantCurrently, this program is a waste of tax payers money, because it puts an artificial floor on home prices. These homes should be priced at around 150k to start with. Its sad to have our money keep this prices out of reach of people who actually don’t qualify for these programs. Let the system work inself out, and low income people with our tax payer money will be able to qualify for a much better home, and those above the minimum to qualify will be able to find something affortable quicker.
November 11, 2007 at 10:33 AM #98379PorkmanDelardoParticipantThe flip side is the artificial ceiling created by the speculators, knife grabbers and the like. Give these working poor people a break. I have no problems with my tax dollars going towards affordable programs to assist people at the bottom of the economic ladder, to get a leg up, one rung at a time so to speak. What I don’t like my tax dollars being spent on is a wasteful unnecessary war prompted by the buffoon in the oval office. That is a whole other argument, not suitable for the website. Just my two cents. Porkman
November 11, 2007 at 10:33 AM #98444PorkmanDelardoParticipantThe flip side is the artificial ceiling created by the speculators, knife grabbers and the like. Give these working poor people a break. I have no problems with my tax dollars going towards affordable programs to assist people at the bottom of the economic ladder, to get a leg up, one rung at a time so to speak. What I don’t like my tax dollars being spent on is a wasteful unnecessary war prompted by the buffoon in the oval office. That is a whole other argument, not suitable for the website. Just my two cents. Porkman
November 11, 2007 at 10:33 AM #98452PorkmanDelardoParticipantThe flip side is the artificial ceiling created by the speculators, knife grabbers and the like. Give these working poor people a break. I have no problems with my tax dollars going towards affordable programs to assist people at the bottom of the economic ladder, to get a leg up, one rung at a time so to speak. What I don’t like my tax dollars being spent on is a wasteful unnecessary war prompted by the buffoon in the oval office. That is a whole other argument, not suitable for the website. Just my two cents. Porkman
November 11, 2007 at 10:33 AM #98458PorkmanDelardoParticipantThe flip side is the artificial ceiling created by the speculators, knife grabbers and the like. Give these working poor people a break. I have no problems with my tax dollars going towards affordable programs to assist people at the bottom of the economic ladder, to get a leg up, one rung at a time so to speak. What I don’t like my tax dollars being spent on is a wasteful unnecessary war prompted by the buffoon in the oval office. That is a whole other argument, not suitable for the website. Just my two cents. Porkman
November 11, 2007 at 10:33 AM #98382unbiasedobserverParticipantI remember when I took my first job out of college earning 32,000 my realtor told me the highest price home I could afford with 5% down was 98,000. I found a house I really liked listed at 102,000 and he strongly urged against me buying it (which I did anyway). How times have changed, now the govt of all people encourages people with that income level to buy in the 300,000s. WTF. Our government evidently wants its citizens to be as broke as it is. Shameful.
November 11, 2007 at 10:33 AM #98446unbiasedobserverParticipantI remember when I took my first job out of college earning 32,000 my realtor told me the highest price home I could afford with 5% down was 98,000. I found a house I really liked listed at 102,000 and he strongly urged against me buying it (which I did anyway). How times have changed, now the govt of all people encourages people with that income level to buy in the 300,000s. WTF. Our government evidently wants its citizens to be as broke as it is. Shameful.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.