![]() | ||||||
San Diego Housing Market News and Analysis |
||||||
~Navigation~~User login~~RSS~ |
Bubble Sectors Account for Bulk of Job LossesSubmitted by Rich Toscano on August 1, 2010 - 7:24pm
In my analysis of the local job market I've long singled out what I
referred to as the "housing bubble beneficiary sectors." As the
name implies, these industries enjoyed
huge growth as a direct result of San Diego's housing bubble.
They were, in no particular order:
Predictably, the swollen bubble sectors deflated right along with the housing bubble itself. And while much of economy suffered, the bubble sectors took the brunt of it. In this article I will take a closer look at how much these three sectors contributed to the region's multi-year job loss trend in comparison to the rest of the region's industries. Just for kicks, I am also going to break out the government sector because it accounts for a big chunk of local employment (19 percent as of June 2010) and, unlike the private sector, its ups and downs are not strongly affected by the business cycle. continue reading at voiceofsandiego.org (category: )
|
~Financial Market Commentary~*Investment advisory services and securities offered through Girard Securities, Inc., member SIPC/FINRA. ~Recent articles~~Active forum topics~
Sponsored Links
~SD Home Price Snapshot~ |
||||
| © 2004-2012 rich toscano | terms of use | privacy policy | powered by drupal | hosted by bitbox | ||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||
The graph which breaks down employment by sector probably answers your question in your previous post about why jobs decline in the summer. It looks like govt jobs decline pretty regularly, based on your chart, and I'd guess that would be related to schools.
I've been saying this for awhile, but think another severe leg down is coming which will be led by major cuts in public spending (including all govt outlays: govt employees, private sector contractors working for the govt, businesses that provide goods/services to the govt, business that rely on tax credits or public grants, and all that stimulus spending that will likely come to an end.). People have a tendency to underestimate the beneficial effects of government spending. It affects almost everyone directly or indirectly.
great article rich-
In a sort of tongue and cheek way, one could argue that the data presented supports the non-monetarists, non-quantitative easing discussions. Massive credit did not produce long-term permanent jobs, just a small (10 year) boost that is now gone. Just like the 787 billion since the bailout. Unfortunately, the people that were the beneficiaries of the boost (construction, professional service) are now going to be looking for work that can't comeback over meaningful time periods for families.
In a relatively no growth world, it is gonna be hard to be an average joe.
I think it's going to be hard for everyone but the super rich in the foreseeable future. That's why I'm always baffled when the market appears to be going up, like it did today. I did my part and bought a brand new motorcycle this last week. American design right here in Cali, but built by Yamaha.