Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
TemekuTParticipant
Whoops, didn’t notice and/or forgot to post relevant details…I must have been coffee deficient.
1. House #1 was headed to REO land early in 2007. It was listed for 6 plus months at $679,000 and expired in February 2007. Then, off of the MLS, looks like some person bought and flipped to a corporation and then to another individual all on the same day in June. The grant deed sequence is confusing and the details are unclear to me, however, since the last MLS listing price prior to expiring in February was $679,000 and since nothing here is going for anywhere near to $810,000 in the last several months, what gives?
2. Only 5% of purchaser’s money in the deal. Wells Fargo 1st & 2nd amount to 85% of the purchase price.
TemekuTParticipantWhoops, didn’t notice and/or forgot to post relevant details…I must have been coffee deficient.
1. House #1 was headed to REO land early in 2007. It was listed for 6 plus months at $679,000 and expired in February 2007. Then, off of the MLS, looks like some person bought and flipped to a corporation and then to another individual all on the same day in June. The grant deed sequence is confusing and the details are unclear to me, however, since the last MLS listing price prior to expiring in February was $679,000 and since nothing here is going for anywhere near to $810,000 in the last several months, what gives?
2. Only 5% of purchaser’s money in the deal. Wells Fargo 1st & 2nd amount to 85% of the purchase price.
TemekuTParticipantThis one is sad. The van owners are friends and they are very good, giving, compassionate people who are not well educated in financial matters and have unfortunately made poor decisions based on the advice of their “investment group” which is headed by some real estate agents & brokers that profited. I fear they are going to be clobbered and go upside down soon. Had I known what they were doing, I would have directed them to this site, however, the damage had been done by the time I found out.
TemekuTParticipantThis one is sad. The van owners are friends and they are very good, giving, compassionate people who are not well educated in financial matters and have unfortunately made poor decisions based on the advice of their “investment group” which is headed by some real estate agents & brokers that profited. I fear they are going to be clobbered and go upside down soon. Had I known what they were doing, I would have directed them to this site, however, the damage had been done by the time I found out.
TemekuTParticipantSD Realtor – I agree with you and you are correct about the earnest money and default and the cost and hassle factor of a legal battle. The fact is that Escrow companies cannot release a deposit in the event of default unless all parties to the contract sign a release.
What I should have added to my post and made clear because of the facts of Tone’s situation is that taking the step of requesting the irrevocable release is a way of putting the Buyer’s “feet to the fire”. A financially weak buyer would panic and run, which in this market would be a blessing in disguise as Tone wouldn’t waste precious days or weeks waiting for the buyer to perform while the market dropped even more. This irrevocable deposit addendum request is a technique used to get a laggard buyer and agent to perform or get out.
Having said that, we know it is easy to get out of a purchase by suddenly having (engineering) a “financial situation” that would preclude qualifying or prevent proceeding, no matter how close to closing you are, and it is almost impossible to get any amount of damages if the buyer wants to fight it. The same applies for damages for a late closing.
TemekuTParticipantSD Realtor – I agree with you and you are correct about the earnest money and default and the cost and hassle factor of a legal battle. The fact is that Escrow companies cannot release a deposit in the event of default unless all parties to the contract sign a release.
What I should have added to my post and made clear because of the facts of Tone’s situation is that taking the step of requesting the irrevocable release is a way of putting the Buyer’s “feet to the fire”. A financially weak buyer would panic and run, which in this market would be a blessing in disguise as Tone wouldn’t waste precious days or weeks waiting for the buyer to perform while the market dropped even more. This irrevocable deposit addendum request is a technique used to get a laggard buyer and agent to perform or get out.
Having said that, we know it is easy to get out of a purchase by suddenly having (engineering) a “financial situation” that would preclude qualifying or prevent proceeding, no matter how close to closing you are, and it is almost impossible to get any amount of damages if the buyer wants to fight it. The same applies for damages for a late closing.
TemekuTParticipantbayparkwatcher, as a trustee you are bound by the Uniform Prudent Investor’s Act. For your own education as to your responsibilities, I would suggest you read “Investing and Managing Trusts under the New Prudent Investor Rule” by John Train and Thomas A. Melfe. This book is easily ordered online and I’d suggest you read it ASAP. Then, if you will contact me via this board, I’ll create a temporary e-mail account so you can write me and get the name of the financial advisor I plan to use.
I am in my last class for certification as a professional fiduciary trustee and my eyes have really been opened by the classes I have taken. I will be testing the above mentioned advisor by moving a portion of my own portfolio over.
I don’t want to mention the name of the person as this is not the point of this board and also because I am just starting with the person.
TemekuTParticipantbayparkwatcher, as a trustee you are bound by the Uniform Prudent Investor’s Act. For your own education as to your responsibilities, I would suggest you read “Investing and Managing Trusts under the New Prudent Investor Rule” by John Train and Thomas A. Melfe. This book is easily ordered online and I’d suggest you read it ASAP. Then, if you will contact me via this board, I’ll create a temporary e-mail account so you can write me and get the name of the financial advisor I plan to use.
I am in my last class for certification as a professional fiduciary trustee and my eyes have really been opened by the classes I have taken. I will be testing the above mentioned advisor by moving a portion of my own portfolio over.
I don’t want to mention the name of the person as this is not the point of this board and also because I am just starting with the person.
TemekuTParticipantTo protect yourself, request that the buyers sign an irrevocable deposit release. Even though they are going with 100% financing, there should be some sort of deposit. This will allow Escrow to release the deposit to you should the buyers fail to perform. If you don’t do this, Escrow, as a neutral fiduciary, won’t release the funds to you in case of failure to perform unless stipulated via a judgment or negotiated settlement at arbitration. Then, to protect the buyers, you submit an addendum to the contract that credits the deposit back to the buyers at COE. I have done this several times in the case of 100% financing.
Do this before you sign the lease.
Good Luck
TemekuTParticipantTo protect yourself, request that the buyers sign an irrevocable deposit release. Even though they are going with 100% financing, there should be some sort of deposit. This will allow Escrow to release the deposit to you should the buyers fail to perform. If you don’t do this, Escrow, as a neutral fiduciary, won’t release the funds to you in case of failure to perform unless stipulated via a judgment or negotiated settlement at arbitration. Then, to protect the buyers, you submit an addendum to the contract that credits the deposit back to the buyers at COE. I have done this several times in the case of 100% financing.
Do this before you sign the lease.
Good Luck
May 15, 2007 at 5:55 PM in reply to: DR Horton Slashes prices $100k in Murrieta, Menifee, Wildomar and more in … #52963TemekuTParticipant23109VC – be very careful about those outlying areas. I was in Hemet yesterday (hadn’t driven there for years) and what a dump it all is once you get out of the new areas. Once you buy in, you’re stuck. There’s a reason why the discounts are so deep in the outlying areas.
May 15, 2007 at 5:51 PM in reply to: DR Horton Slashes prices $100k in Murrieta, Menifee, Wildomar and more in … #52962TemekuTParticipantkev374 – where were comparable houses in Temecula or Murrieta priced at $75,000 in 1997? I bought a new house in Temeku Hills in Fairway Point in 1997, a small 1775 sq. ft. 2 and 2 with a den with a great floor plan and it was $154,900. That was the least expensive new home in Temeku Hills and prices in Fairway Point went to the mid 200’s. I don’t recall Murrieta being below 150K for a new 3 and 2. Maybe old, small homes in Hemet or Wildomar were under 100K. I do recall the 3 and 2.5 townhomes on Margarita (blue trim and red tile roofs) were in the 80’s.
TemekuTParticipantSo Correct, sdrealtor.
Both myself (broker) and my husband (broker) have watched this play out in our neighborhood. The ubiquitous “Everyman” became a realtor/investor in the last few years, speculated on property here in Temecula, got caught in the flip cycle, and just walked away and let the property go. Your posting is timely because just a few days ago we were counting the brown lawns here and commenting on how many were realtor owned (if you can call 100% financed flips owned!). We have watched two realtors on our street lose houses that they lived in. First we saw the NOD’s, then the leased luxury cars disappeared, then the gardeners ceased gardening, then the NOT’s, and in one case, unwillingness to vacate led to bargaining and $$$ in exchange for possession.
We are now watching the realtor across the street trying to hold up the comps. “I’m not going to give my house away” is his line. He can’t accept the downturn, even though his house has been for sale about 15 months and even though as he chased the market down he Heloc’d twice and is now mortgaged about 30% over the market value of his house.
And next door to us the “realtor/investor” finally got a renter in the place…but…the FY 2006-2007 property taxes have not been paid.
It seems like a lot of the recent licensees out here were operating as “neighborhood specialists” and at the same time, flipping property at not exactly arms’ length transactions within their investment groups.
We don’t understand why the DRE lacks funding and manpower to shut down the obvious scam agents. Our 2 reports of extreme wrongdoing were ignored by the DRE.
Too bad the ethical, conservative, competent agents and brokers are automatically tossed in the same pot with the rest.
TemekuTParticipantGN, if it is a townhouse there can be different lots (i.e., parcel numbers) for the common areas vs. the actual townhouse.
Generally, the reason for putting the property in a trust is for estate planning and taxation purposes for someone with ample assets.
-
AuthorPosts