[ocrenter]

***troll alert***

this has been a real alert of the emergency troll alert system.

now back to regular programming.

[ocrenter]

***troll alert***

this has been a real alert of the emergency troll alert system.

now back to regular programming.

[ocrenter]

While tea party’s inability to compromise did make them the party of blame (and if you believe polls they have suffered quite a bit of set back), I seriously doubt “the $4 trillion grand bargain” obama put on the table would even be mentioned if voters did not turn the house republican with a lot of tea party backing.

[ocrenter]

While tea party’s inability to compromise did make them the party of blame (and if you believe polls they have suffered quite a bit of set back), I seriously doubt “the $4 trillion grand bargain” obama put on the table would even be mentioned if voters did not turn the house republican with a lot of tea party backing.

[ocrenter]

While tea party’s inability to compromise did make them the party of blame (and if you believe polls they have suffered quite a bit of set back), I seriously doubt “the $4 trillion grand bargain” obama put on the table would even be mentioned if voters did not turn the house republican with a lot of tea party backing.

[ocrenter]

While tea party’s inability to compromise did make them the party of blame (and if you believe polls they have suffered quite a bit of set back), I seriously doubt “the $4 trillion grand bargain” obama put on the table would even be mentioned if voters did not turn the house republican with a lot of tea party backing.

[ocrenter]

While tea party’s inability to compromise did make them the party of blame (and if you believe polls they have suffered quite a bit of set back), I seriously doubt “the $4 trillion grand bargain” obama put on the table would even be mentioned if voters did not turn the house republican with a lot of tea party backing.

[ocrenter]

[quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.

With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.

As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]

yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.

looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.

here’s the original from John Laing:

http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm

here’s the second try from California West:

http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1

and now the latest from City Venture:

http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php

[ocrenter]

[quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.

With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.

As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]

yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.

looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.

here’s the original from John Laing:

http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm

here’s the second try from California West:

http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1

and now the latest from City Venture:

http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php

[ocrenter]

[quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.

With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.

As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]

yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.

looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.

here’s the original from John Laing:

http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm

here’s the second try from California West:

http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1

and now the latest from City Venture:

http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php

[ocrenter]

[quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.

With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.

As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]

yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.

looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.

here’s the original from John Laing:

http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm

here’s the second try from California West:

http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1

and now the latest from City Venture:

http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php

[ocrenter]

[quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.

With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.

As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]

yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.

looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.

here’s the original from John Laing:

http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm

here’s the second try from California West:

http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1

and now the latest from City Venture:

http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php

[ocrenter]

I vote for the 20% as well.

You’ll have the liquidity to invest. And you’ll have the tax shelter of the mortgage interest.

of course, SDR is right, you are talking about the future and several things could change. The interest rate may go up, if so, you’ll be better off increasing your down payment. In addition, the mortgage interest deduction in its current form will likely change. There will likely be a cap of some type, either in % or in total amount. That may lead you to want to pay more down as well.

[ocrenter]

I vote for the 20% as well.

You’ll have the liquidity to invest. And you’ll have the tax shelter of the mortgage interest.

of course, SDR is right, you are talking about the future and several things could change. The interest rate may go up, if so, you’ll be better off increasing your down payment. In addition, the mortgage interest deduction in its current form will likely change. There will likely be a cap of some type, either in % or in total amount. That may lead you to want to pay more down as well.

[ocrenter]

I vote for the 20% as well.

You’ll have the liquidity to invest. And you’ll have the tax shelter of the mortgage interest.

of course, SDR is right, you are talking about the future and several things could change. The interest rate may go up, if so, you’ll be better off increasing your down payment. In addition, the mortgage interest deduction in its current form will likely change. There will likely be a cap of some type, either in % or in total amount. That may lead you to want to pay more down as well.

[Author]

Posts