Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
OC BurnsParticipant
WaMu is next.
Downey is toast too…. but WaMu is next.
OC BurnsParticipantWaMu is next.
Downey is toast too…. but WaMu is next.
OC BurnsParticipantWaMu is next.
Downey is toast too…. but WaMu is next.
OC BurnsParticipantWaMu is next.
Downey is toast too…. but WaMu is next.
OC BurnsParticipant“IndyMac’s failure is the first bank failure in California since 2003 and is expected to cost the FDIC between $4 billion and $8 billion, based on the regulator’s preliminary estimates.”
You know…somewhere between 4 BILLION and 8 BILLION.
Quite a margin of error, eh?
With accountants like these, who needs thieves?
OC BurnsParticipant“IndyMac’s failure is the first bank failure in California since 2003 and is expected to cost the FDIC between $4 billion and $8 billion, based on the regulator’s preliminary estimates.”
You know…somewhere between 4 BILLION and 8 BILLION.
Quite a margin of error, eh?
With accountants like these, who needs thieves?
OC BurnsParticipant“IndyMac’s failure is the first bank failure in California since 2003 and is expected to cost the FDIC between $4 billion and $8 billion, based on the regulator’s preliminary estimates.”
You know…somewhere between 4 BILLION and 8 BILLION.
Quite a margin of error, eh?
With accountants like these, who needs thieves?
OC BurnsParticipant“IndyMac’s failure is the first bank failure in California since 2003 and is expected to cost the FDIC between $4 billion and $8 billion, based on the regulator’s preliminary estimates.”
You know…somewhere between 4 BILLION and 8 BILLION.
Quite a margin of error, eh?
With accountants like these, who needs thieves?
OC BurnsParticipant“IndyMac’s failure is the first bank failure in California since 2003 and is expected to cost the FDIC between $4 billion and $8 billion, based on the regulator’s preliminary estimates.”
You know…somewhere between 4 BILLION and 8 BILLION.
Quite a margin of error, eh?
With accountants like these, who needs thieves?
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237770OC BurnsParticipant[quote=nostradamus]Sad but true OC. POTUS is a mask over the people who really pull the strings. Illuminati or whatever you wish to call them. I sound like a conspiracy nut but I really believe this.[/quote]
Using the term “Illuminati” makes people think of lizard-people, aliens, and black helicopter paranoia (sorry Denver…not paranoia for you!)
Dr. Carroll Quigley of Georgetown U. wrote a book called “Tragedy & Hope” wherein he explained it all. He calls them capitalists and agrees with this plan. His book is illuminating, to say the least.
Dr. Quigley also recruited Bill Clinton and was a mentor to him. Maybe Dr. Quigley was a “crazy conspiracy theorist.”
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237904OC BurnsParticipant[quote=nostradamus]Sad but true OC. POTUS is a mask over the people who really pull the strings. Illuminati or whatever you wish to call them. I sound like a conspiracy nut but I really believe this.[/quote]
Using the term “Illuminati” makes people think of lizard-people, aliens, and black helicopter paranoia (sorry Denver…not paranoia for you!)
Dr. Carroll Quigley of Georgetown U. wrote a book called “Tragedy & Hope” wherein he explained it all. He calls them capitalists and agrees with this plan. His book is illuminating, to say the least.
Dr. Quigley also recruited Bill Clinton and was a mentor to him. Maybe Dr. Quigley was a “crazy conspiracy theorist.”
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237912OC BurnsParticipant[quote=nostradamus]Sad but true OC. POTUS is a mask over the people who really pull the strings. Illuminati or whatever you wish to call them. I sound like a conspiracy nut but I really believe this.[/quote]
Using the term “Illuminati” makes people think of lizard-people, aliens, and black helicopter paranoia (sorry Denver…not paranoia for you!)
Dr. Carroll Quigley of Georgetown U. wrote a book called “Tragedy & Hope” wherein he explained it all. He calls them capitalists and agrees with this plan. His book is illuminating, to say the least.
Dr. Quigley also recruited Bill Clinton and was a mentor to him. Maybe Dr. Quigley was a “crazy conspiracy theorist.”
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237960OC BurnsParticipant[quote=nostradamus]Sad but true OC. POTUS is a mask over the people who really pull the strings. Illuminati or whatever you wish to call them. I sound like a conspiracy nut but I really believe this.[/quote]
Using the term “Illuminati” makes people think of lizard-people, aliens, and black helicopter paranoia (sorry Denver…not paranoia for you!)
Dr. Carroll Quigley of Georgetown U. wrote a book called “Tragedy & Hope” wherein he explained it all. He calls them capitalists and agrees with this plan. His book is illuminating, to say the least.
Dr. Quigley also recruited Bill Clinton and was a mentor to him. Maybe Dr. Quigley was a “crazy conspiracy theorist.”
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237972OC BurnsParticipant[quote=nostradamus]Sad but true OC. POTUS is a mask over the people who really pull the strings. Illuminati or whatever you wish to call them. I sound like a conspiracy nut but I really believe this.[/quote]
Using the term “Illuminati” makes people think of lizard-people, aliens, and black helicopter paranoia (sorry Denver…not paranoia for you!)
Dr. Carroll Quigley of Georgetown U. wrote a book called “Tragedy & Hope” wherein he explained it all. He calls them capitalists and agrees with this plan. His book is illuminating, to say the least.
Dr. Quigley also recruited Bill Clinton and was a mentor to him. Maybe Dr. Quigley was a “crazy conspiracy theorist.”
-
AuthorPosts