[andymajumder]

[quote=sdrealtor]The further this goes, the happier I am that I stayed away from participating in this thread.[/quote]

I know, who would have imagined the thread would wind up on a asian pornstar. I ended up googling Evelyn Lin at work just to check who she is…:-)

[andymajumder]

[quote=sdrealtor]The further this goes, the happier I am that I stayed away from participating in this thread.[/quote]

I know, who would have imagined the thread would wind up on a asian pornstar. I ended up googling Evelyn Lin at work just to check who she is…:-)

[andymajumder]

[quote=sdrealtor]The further this goes, the happier I am that I stayed away from participating in this thread.[/quote]

I know, who would have imagined the thread would wind up on a asian pornstar. I ended up googling Evelyn Lin at work just to check who she is…:-)

[andymajumder]

[quote=sdrealtor]The further this goes, the happier I am that I stayed away from participating in this thread.[/quote]

I know, who would have imagined the thread would wind up on a asian pornstar. I ended up googling Evelyn Lin at work just to check who she is…:-)

[andymajumder]

[quote=carlsbadworker][quote=flu]Maybe they just have more money then the average bear and/or manage their finances better…Yes, this is as ridiculous of any generalization than anything else suggested…… Anyone else care to have any brilliant ideas?[/quote]

OK. Since this is a thread about stereotype and ridiculous generalization, I will go some extra length here. Yes, they have more income than average, and save better, which results in a better qualification for home ownership, but then they are blinded by the home ownership because they have skins in the game.
So on one hand, we know that poor math skills would result in terrible financial decisions, but on the other hand, the Asian population proves that being good at math does not equal to being financially smart.
Asians are generally not good investors, mostly because they lack the investment options in their homelands, so they are not trained to think like an investor. As a result, they lack the good perspective in analyzing the investment options (e.g. factoring in property tax differences between US and their homeland country). The education system results in many PhDs who are experts in their own subject but are idiots outside their own domain.[/quote]

While..whether or not asians are bad investors is debatable, investment options in asia have increased dramatically in the past decade. In fact, Hong Kong may become the center of financial markets this decade. What’s happened in the past 20 to 30 years shapes the financial behavior of folks, most younger asian immigrants have seen housinghomes to be a great investment in their own country and have seen the impact of currency devaluation while growing up (like the asian crisis in late nineties which lead to some currencies loosing significant value overnight). Hence, they are attracted towards to hard asset such as homes, gold etc. That’s all I am trying to say, its not about being dumb or smart.

[andymajumder]

[quote=carlsbadworker][quote=flu]Maybe they just have more money then the average bear and/or manage their finances better…Yes, this is as ridiculous of any generalization than anything else suggested…… Anyone else care to have any brilliant ideas?[/quote]

OK. Since this is a thread about stereotype and ridiculous generalization, I will go some extra length here. Yes, they have more income than average, and save better, which results in a better qualification for home ownership, but then they are blinded by the home ownership because they have skins in the game.
So on one hand, we know that poor math skills would result in terrible financial decisions, but on the other hand, the Asian population proves that being good at math does not equal to being financially smart.
Asians are generally not good investors, mostly because they lack the investment options in their homelands, so they are not trained to think like an investor. As a result, they lack the good perspective in analyzing the investment options (e.g. factoring in property tax differences between US and their homeland country). The education system results in many PhDs who are experts in their own subject but are idiots outside their own domain.[/quote]

While..whether or not asians are bad investors is debatable, investment options in asia have increased dramatically in the past decade. In fact, Hong Kong may become the center of financial markets this decade. What’s happened in the past 20 to 30 years shapes the financial behavior of folks, most younger asian immigrants have seen housinghomes to be a great investment in their own country and have seen the impact of currency devaluation while growing up (like the asian crisis in late nineties which lead to some currencies loosing significant value overnight). Hence, they are attracted towards to hard asset such as homes, gold etc. That’s all I am trying to say, its not about being dumb or smart.

[andymajumder]

[quote=carlsbadworker][quote=flu]Maybe they just have more money then the average bear and/or manage their finances better…Yes, this is as ridiculous of any generalization than anything else suggested…… Anyone else care to have any brilliant ideas?[/quote]

OK. Since this is a thread about stereotype and ridiculous generalization, I will go some extra length here. Yes, they have more income than average, and save better, which results in a better qualification for home ownership, but then they are blinded by the home ownership because they have skins in the game.
So on one hand, we know that poor math skills would result in terrible financial decisions, but on the other hand, the Asian population proves that being good at math does not equal to being financially smart.
Asians are generally not good investors, mostly because they lack the investment options in their homelands, so they are not trained to think like an investor. As a result, they lack the good perspective in analyzing the investment options (e.g. factoring in property tax differences between US and their homeland country). The education system results in many PhDs who are experts in their own subject but are idiots outside their own domain.[/quote]

While..whether or not asians are bad investors is debatable, investment options in asia have increased dramatically in the past decade. In fact, Hong Kong may become the center of financial markets this decade. What’s happened in the past 20 to 30 years shapes the financial behavior of folks, most younger asian immigrants have seen housinghomes to be a great investment in their own country and have seen the impact of currency devaluation while growing up (like the asian crisis in late nineties which lead to some currencies loosing significant value overnight). Hence, they are attracted towards to hard asset such as homes, gold etc. That’s all I am trying to say, its not about being dumb or smart.

[andymajumder]

[quote=carlsbadworker][quote=flu]Maybe they just have more money then the average bear and/or manage their finances better…Yes, this is as ridiculous of any generalization than anything else suggested…… Anyone else care to have any brilliant ideas?[/quote]

OK. Since this is a thread about stereotype and ridiculous generalization, I will go some extra length here. Yes, they have more income than average, and save better, which results in a better qualification for home ownership, but then they are blinded by the home ownership because they have skins in the game.
So on one hand, we know that poor math skills would result in terrible financial decisions, but on the other hand, the Asian population proves that being good at math does not equal to being financially smart.
Asians are generally not good investors, mostly because they lack the investment options in their homelands, so they are not trained to think like an investor. As a result, they lack the good perspective in analyzing the investment options (e.g. factoring in property tax differences between US and their homeland country). The education system results in many PhDs who are experts in their own subject but are idiots outside their own domain.[/quote]

While..whether or not asians are bad investors is debatable, investment options in asia have increased dramatically in the past decade. In fact, Hong Kong may become the center of financial markets this decade. What’s happened in the past 20 to 30 years shapes the financial behavior of folks, most younger asian immigrants have seen housinghomes to be a great investment in their own country and have seen the impact of currency devaluation while growing up (like the asian crisis in late nineties which lead to some currencies loosing significant value overnight). Hence, they are attracted towards to hard asset such as homes, gold etc. That’s all I am trying to say, its not about being dumb or smart.

[andymajumder]

[quote=carlsbadworker][quote=flu]Maybe they just have more money then the average bear and/or manage their finances better…Yes, this is as ridiculous of any generalization than anything else suggested…… Anyone else care to have any brilliant ideas?[/quote]

OK. Since this is a thread about stereotype and ridiculous generalization, I will go some extra length here. Yes, they have more income than average, and save better, which results in a better qualification for home ownership, but then they are blinded by the home ownership because they have skins in the game.
So on one hand, we know that poor math skills would result in terrible financial decisions, but on the other hand, the Asian population proves that being good at math does not equal to being financially smart.
Asians are generally not good investors, mostly because they lack the investment options in their homelands, so they are not trained to think like an investor. As a result, they lack the good perspective in analyzing the investment options (e.g. factoring in property tax differences between US and their homeland country). The education system results in many PhDs who are experts in their own subject but are idiots outside their own domain.[/quote]

While..whether or not asians are bad investors is debatable, investment options in asia have increased dramatically in the past decade. In fact, Hong Kong may become the center of financial markets this decade. What’s happened in the past 20 to 30 years shapes the financial behavior of folks, most younger asian immigrants have seen housinghomes to be a great investment in their own country and have seen the impact of currency devaluation while growing up (like the asian crisis in late nineties which lead to some currencies loosing significant value overnight). Hence, they are attracted towards to hard asset such as homes, gold etc. That’s all I am trying to say, its not about being dumb or smart.

[andymajumder]

While things may look somewhat bleak now, I think deadzone is being just too negative. Quite sure desirable areas of San Diego are not going down to 2000 nominal prices…just not happening. It doesn’t matter if unemployment rate is 12% – you just need a certain section of the population to keep doing well, which they are. Even if you breakdown the unemployment numbers now, the jobless rate amongst blue collar workers is 3 times that of white collar workers and the jobless rate amongst people with professional degrees is about 5%, nothing to be alarmed about.
We will see further declines ahead..but the majority of the decline has already happened. If anything, its almost certain we will have significant inflation in a few years and 2010-2011 home prices will look really cheap in 2020 in nominal terms.

[andymajumder]

While things may look somewhat bleak now, I think deadzone is being just too negative. Quite sure desirable areas of San Diego are not going down to 2000 nominal prices…just not happening. It doesn’t matter if unemployment rate is 12% – you just need a certain section of the population to keep doing well, which they are. Even if you breakdown the unemployment numbers now, the jobless rate amongst blue collar workers is 3 times that of white collar workers and the jobless rate amongst people with professional degrees is about 5%, nothing to be alarmed about.
We will see further declines ahead..but the majority of the decline has already happened. If anything, its almost certain we will have significant inflation in a few years and 2010-2011 home prices will look really cheap in 2020 in nominal terms.

[andymajumder]

While things may look somewhat bleak now, I think deadzone is being just too negative. Quite sure desirable areas of San Diego are not going down to 2000 nominal prices…just not happening. It doesn’t matter if unemployment rate is 12% – you just need a certain section of the population to keep doing well, which they are. Even if you breakdown the unemployment numbers now, the jobless rate amongst blue collar workers is 3 times that of white collar workers and the jobless rate amongst people with professional degrees is about 5%, nothing to be alarmed about.
We will see further declines ahead..but the majority of the decline has already happened. If anything, its almost certain we will have significant inflation in a few years and 2010-2011 home prices will look really cheap in 2020 in nominal terms.

[andymajumder]

While things may look somewhat bleak now, I think deadzone is being just too negative. Quite sure desirable areas of San Diego are not going down to 2000 nominal prices…just not happening. It doesn’t matter if unemployment rate is 12% – you just need a certain section of the population to keep doing well, which they are. Even if you breakdown the unemployment numbers now, the jobless rate amongst blue collar workers is 3 times that of white collar workers and the jobless rate amongst people with professional degrees is about 5%, nothing to be alarmed about.
We will see further declines ahead..but the majority of the decline has already happened. If anything, its almost certain we will have significant inflation in a few years and 2010-2011 home prices will look really cheap in 2020 in nominal terms.

[andymajumder]

While things may look somewhat bleak now, I think deadzone is being just too negative. Quite sure desirable areas of San Diego are not going down to 2000 nominal prices…just not happening. It doesn’t matter if unemployment rate is 12% – you just need a certain section of the population to keep doing well, which they are. Even if you breakdown the unemployment numbers now, the jobless rate amongst blue collar workers is 3 times that of white collar workers and the jobless rate amongst people with professional degrees is about 5%, nothing to be alarmed about.
We will see further declines ahead..but the majority of the decline has already happened. If anything, its almost certain we will have significant inflation in a few years and 2010-2011 home prices will look really cheap in 2020 in nominal terms.

[andymajumder]

[quote=Scarlett]I’d be happy with a 2002 nominal pricing for Rancho Penasquitos…[/quote]

That may be possible quite soon. Actually even now if you negotiate hard you can get early 2003 nominal price…and than factor in that interest rates are about 2% lower now than early 2003, you are probably getting early to mid 2002 prices. You do have to take the cost of financing into account.

[Author]

Posts