Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 22, 2007 at 8:49 AM in reply to: How many people are holding houses off the market? #122674December 22, 2007 at 8:49 AM in reply to: How many people are holding houses off the market? #12282134f3f3fParticipant
Apparently, during the last downturn that threatened Italy, home owners were so stubborn, they held out and prices were contained. That could all be hearsay of course.
I think this is what a lot of people are waiting for, especially in the higher price bracket. I am not an expert like so many here, but it seems to me the air is thick with tension, as a relentless tug-of-war takes place. The patient waiters will probably win out, because they have less to lose in this. Maybe if there are enough people who want to sell but don’t actually need to, it will have some stabilizing effect, but I see SoCal as a transient place, and people move on, which might explain some of the volatility in the first place.
December 22, 2007 at 8:49 AM in reply to: How many people are holding houses off the market? #12284834f3f3fParticipantApparently, during the last downturn that threatened Italy, home owners were so stubborn, they held out and prices were contained. That could all be hearsay of course.
I think this is what a lot of people are waiting for, especially in the higher price bracket. I am not an expert like so many here, but it seems to me the air is thick with tension, as a relentless tug-of-war takes place. The patient waiters will probably win out, because they have less to lose in this. Maybe if there are enough people who want to sell but don’t actually need to, it will have some stabilizing effect, but I see SoCal as a transient place, and people move on, which might explain some of the volatility in the first place.
December 22, 2007 at 8:49 AM in reply to: How many people are holding houses off the market? #12290134f3f3fParticipantApparently, during the last downturn that threatened Italy, home owners were so stubborn, they held out and prices were contained. That could all be hearsay of course.
I think this is what a lot of people are waiting for, especially in the higher price bracket. I am not an expert like so many here, but it seems to me the air is thick with tension, as a relentless tug-of-war takes place. The patient waiters will probably win out, because they have less to lose in this. Maybe if there are enough people who want to sell but don’t actually need to, it will have some stabilizing effect, but I see SoCal as a transient place, and people move on, which might explain some of the volatility in the first place.
December 22, 2007 at 8:49 AM in reply to: How many people are holding houses off the market? #12292034f3f3fParticipantApparently, during the last downturn that threatened Italy, home owners were so stubborn, they held out and prices were contained. That could all be hearsay of course.
I think this is what a lot of people are waiting for, especially in the higher price bracket. I am not an expert like so many here, but it seems to me the air is thick with tension, as a relentless tug-of-war takes place. The patient waiters will probably win out, because they have less to lose in this. Maybe if there are enough people who want to sell but don’t actually need to, it will have some stabilizing effect, but I see SoCal as a transient place, and people move on, which might explain some of the volatility in the first place.
34f3f3fParticipantlindismith, who is Rich? I am tentatively looking for a new FA. Mine is retiring.
34f3f3fParticipantlindismith, who is Rich? I am tentatively looking for a new FA. Mine is retiring.
34f3f3fParticipantlindismith, who is Rich? I am tentatively looking for a new FA. Mine is retiring.
34f3f3fParticipantlindismith, who is Rich? I am tentatively looking for a new FA. Mine is retiring.
34f3f3fParticipantlindismith, who is Rich? I am tentatively looking for a new FA. Mine is retiring.
34f3f3fParticipantI have a 37″ Panasonic plasma, and channels without Hi-Def are worse than tube. Also, I don’t know if they worked around the problem of greys yet, but if a movie is shot in a dark location, plasmas don’t pick out the full spectrum of black to greys, and the result is you can’t see much. I also have a small LCD which is pretty good for what it is.
34f3f3fParticipantI have a 37″ Panasonic plasma, and channels without Hi-Def are worse than tube. Also, I don’t know if they worked around the problem of greys yet, but if a movie is shot in a dark location, plasmas don’t pick out the full spectrum of black to greys, and the result is you can’t see much. I also have a small LCD which is pretty good for what it is.
34f3f3fParticipantI have a 37″ Panasonic plasma, and channels without Hi-Def are worse than tube. Also, I don’t know if they worked around the problem of greys yet, but if a movie is shot in a dark location, plasmas don’t pick out the full spectrum of black to greys, and the result is you can’t see much. I also have a small LCD which is pretty good for what it is.
34f3f3fParticipantI have a 37″ Panasonic plasma, and channels without Hi-Def are worse than tube. Also, I don’t know if they worked around the problem of greys yet, but if a movie is shot in a dark location, plasmas don’t pick out the full spectrum of black to greys, and the result is you can’t see much. I also have a small LCD which is pretty good for what it is.
34f3f3fParticipantI have a 37″ Panasonic plasma, and channels without Hi-Def are worse than tube. Also, I don’t know if they worked around the problem of greys yet, but if a movie is shot in a dark location, plasmas don’t pick out the full spectrum of black to greys, and the result is you can’t see much. I also have a small LCD which is pretty good for what it is.
-
AuthorPosts