- This topic has 160 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by Ricechex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 27, 2008 at 3:58 PM #177702March 27, 2008 at 4:36 PM #177271DanielParticipant
Very nice link. That example is in perfect agreement with what I have witnessed in my neighborhood (see a few posts above). Precisely the same problem. Two houses that are identical, were valued nearly the same a year or two ago, and are apart by more than $200K now.
I offered an explanation for the discrepancy (maybe Zillow 2.0 gives too much weight to prices of nearby houses). That’s really the only way I can wrap my mind around this. Everything else (lot sizes, year built, etc) is the same and can’t account for the difference.
Yes, Zillow’s got a bit of a problem. To be fair to them, what they want to do (produce an accurate estimate on each and every house) is very hard work. Close to impossible. In contrast, the Case-Shiller algorithm is a piece of cake. They average over an entire metropolitan area, kinda hard to get that wrong.
March 27, 2008 at 4:36 PM #177621DanielParticipantVery nice link. That example is in perfect agreement with what I have witnessed in my neighborhood (see a few posts above). Precisely the same problem. Two houses that are identical, were valued nearly the same a year or two ago, and are apart by more than $200K now.
I offered an explanation for the discrepancy (maybe Zillow 2.0 gives too much weight to prices of nearby houses). That’s really the only way I can wrap my mind around this. Everything else (lot sizes, year built, etc) is the same and can’t account for the difference.
Yes, Zillow’s got a bit of a problem. To be fair to them, what they want to do (produce an accurate estimate on each and every house) is very hard work. Close to impossible. In contrast, the Case-Shiller algorithm is a piece of cake. They average over an entire metropolitan area, kinda hard to get that wrong.
March 27, 2008 at 4:36 PM #177629DanielParticipantVery nice link. That example is in perfect agreement with what I have witnessed in my neighborhood (see a few posts above). Precisely the same problem. Two houses that are identical, were valued nearly the same a year or two ago, and are apart by more than $200K now.
I offered an explanation for the discrepancy (maybe Zillow 2.0 gives too much weight to prices of nearby houses). That’s really the only way I can wrap my mind around this. Everything else (lot sizes, year built, etc) is the same and can’t account for the difference.
Yes, Zillow’s got a bit of a problem. To be fair to them, what they want to do (produce an accurate estimate on each and every house) is very hard work. Close to impossible. In contrast, the Case-Shiller algorithm is a piece of cake. They average over an entire metropolitan area, kinda hard to get that wrong.
March 27, 2008 at 4:36 PM #177635DanielParticipantVery nice link. That example is in perfect agreement with what I have witnessed in my neighborhood (see a few posts above). Precisely the same problem. Two houses that are identical, were valued nearly the same a year or two ago, and are apart by more than $200K now.
I offered an explanation for the discrepancy (maybe Zillow 2.0 gives too much weight to prices of nearby houses). That’s really the only way I can wrap my mind around this. Everything else (lot sizes, year built, etc) is the same and can’t account for the difference.
Yes, Zillow’s got a bit of a problem. To be fair to them, what they want to do (produce an accurate estimate on each and every house) is very hard work. Close to impossible. In contrast, the Case-Shiller algorithm is a piece of cake. They average over an entire metropolitan area, kinda hard to get that wrong.
March 27, 2008 at 4:36 PM #177722DanielParticipantVery nice link. That example is in perfect agreement with what I have witnessed in my neighborhood (see a few posts above). Precisely the same problem. Two houses that are identical, were valued nearly the same a year or two ago, and are apart by more than $200K now.
I offered an explanation for the discrepancy (maybe Zillow 2.0 gives too much weight to prices of nearby houses). That’s really the only way I can wrap my mind around this. Everything else (lot sizes, year built, etc) is the same and can’t account for the difference.
Yes, Zillow’s got a bit of a problem. To be fair to them, what they want to do (produce an accurate estimate on each and every house) is very hard work. Close to impossible. In contrast, the Case-Shiller algorithm is a piece of cake. They average over an entire metropolitan area, kinda hard to get that wrong.
March 27, 2008 at 5:54 PM #177288temeculaguyParticipantZillow is still too high in most situations, because it looks backwards. Even six month old data is out or date, the only real data is seven days old and that is why appraisers will never be put out of work.
I jut looked up the zestimate for a house I’m scoping, it’s zestimate is 450k, down 25k in 30 days. Guess what, it is listed for 329k, not sold, still listed, but there were sales six months ago for comps that were in the 400’s, problem is, the computer cant keep up, there are places losing 25k a month, every month for the last year. Some mope logs on and sees his place next door went down 25k and wants to complain, have at it buddy, ask an appraiser and you will probably cry.
I checked the zillow for ten houses that I or people that e-mail me are looking at that are listed and every one was ziollowed as being down 20-50k in the last month but still 100-200k over the list price, I wouldn’t want to be working the zillow complaint department in six months when it really starts to hit the fan.
I still think that the weight on driver’s licenses should say “zestimate”
March 27, 2008 at 5:54 PM #177641temeculaguyParticipantZillow is still too high in most situations, because it looks backwards. Even six month old data is out or date, the only real data is seven days old and that is why appraisers will never be put out of work.
I jut looked up the zestimate for a house I’m scoping, it’s zestimate is 450k, down 25k in 30 days. Guess what, it is listed for 329k, not sold, still listed, but there were sales six months ago for comps that were in the 400’s, problem is, the computer cant keep up, there are places losing 25k a month, every month for the last year. Some mope logs on and sees his place next door went down 25k and wants to complain, have at it buddy, ask an appraiser and you will probably cry.
I checked the zillow for ten houses that I or people that e-mail me are looking at that are listed and every one was ziollowed as being down 20-50k in the last month but still 100-200k over the list price, I wouldn’t want to be working the zillow complaint department in six months when it really starts to hit the fan.
I still think that the weight on driver’s licenses should say “zestimate”
March 27, 2008 at 5:54 PM #177649temeculaguyParticipantZillow is still too high in most situations, because it looks backwards. Even six month old data is out or date, the only real data is seven days old and that is why appraisers will never be put out of work.
I jut looked up the zestimate for a house I’m scoping, it’s zestimate is 450k, down 25k in 30 days. Guess what, it is listed for 329k, not sold, still listed, but there were sales six months ago for comps that were in the 400’s, problem is, the computer cant keep up, there are places losing 25k a month, every month for the last year. Some mope logs on and sees his place next door went down 25k and wants to complain, have at it buddy, ask an appraiser and you will probably cry.
I checked the zillow for ten houses that I or people that e-mail me are looking at that are listed and every one was ziollowed as being down 20-50k in the last month but still 100-200k over the list price, I wouldn’t want to be working the zillow complaint department in six months when it really starts to hit the fan.
I still think that the weight on driver’s licenses should say “zestimate”
March 27, 2008 at 5:54 PM #177655temeculaguyParticipantZillow is still too high in most situations, because it looks backwards. Even six month old data is out or date, the only real data is seven days old and that is why appraisers will never be put out of work.
I jut looked up the zestimate for a house I’m scoping, it’s zestimate is 450k, down 25k in 30 days. Guess what, it is listed for 329k, not sold, still listed, but there were sales six months ago for comps that were in the 400’s, problem is, the computer cant keep up, there are places losing 25k a month, every month for the last year. Some mope logs on and sees his place next door went down 25k and wants to complain, have at it buddy, ask an appraiser and you will probably cry.
I checked the zillow for ten houses that I or people that e-mail me are looking at that are listed and every one was ziollowed as being down 20-50k in the last month but still 100-200k over the list price, I wouldn’t want to be working the zillow complaint department in six months when it really starts to hit the fan.
I still think that the weight on driver’s licenses should say “zestimate”
March 27, 2008 at 5:54 PM #177742temeculaguyParticipantZillow is still too high in most situations, because it looks backwards. Even six month old data is out or date, the only real data is seven days old and that is why appraisers will never be put out of work.
I jut looked up the zestimate for a house I’m scoping, it’s zestimate is 450k, down 25k in 30 days. Guess what, it is listed for 329k, not sold, still listed, but there were sales six months ago for comps that were in the 400’s, problem is, the computer cant keep up, there are places losing 25k a month, every month for the last year. Some mope logs on and sees his place next door went down 25k and wants to complain, have at it buddy, ask an appraiser and you will probably cry.
I checked the zillow for ten houses that I or people that e-mail me are looking at that are listed and every one was ziollowed as being down 20-50k in the last month but still 100-200k over the list price, I wouldn’t want to be working the zillow complaint department in six months when it really starts to hit the fan.
I still think that the weight on driver’s licenses should say “zestimate”
March 27, 2008 at 7:44 PM #177308beanmaestroParticipantWell, for shits and giggles, the duplex we’re currently renting has a Zestimate of 1.47M, despite having a total rent of $4100/mo, and being in worse shape than duplexes that have rotted on the market around $1.1M. When they’re off by 50%, you just have to laugh.
March 27, 2008 at 7:44 PM #177661beanmaestroParticipantWell, for shits and giggles, the duplex we’re currently renting has a Zestimate of 1.47M, despite having a total rent of $4100/mo, and being in worse shape than duplexes that have rotted on the market around $1.1M. When they’re off by 50%, you just have to laugh.
March 27, 2008 at 7:44 PM #177669beanmaestroParticipantWell, for shits and giggles, the duplex we’re currently renting has a Zestimate of 1.47M, despite having a total rent of $4100/mo, and being in worse shape than duplexes that have rotted on the market around $1.1M. When they’re off by 50%, you just have to laugh.
March 27, 2008 at 7:44 PM #177675beanmaestroParticipantWell, for shits and giggles, the duplex we’re currently renting has a Zestimate of 1.47M, despite having a total rent of $4100/mo, and being in worse shape than duplexes that have rotted on the market around $1.1M. When they’re off by 50%, you just have to laugh.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.