- This topic has 360 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by drunkle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 8, 2008 at 12:48 PM #301985November 8, 2008 at 4:56 PM #301611vegasrenterParticipant
The phenomenon about flyover country is also somewhat recent. Something I found interesting is that the red state/blue state divide was almost opposite 30 years ago; check out the 1976 electoral map – NOTE: colors are different, blue=republican, red=democrat.
http://www.presidentelect.org/e1976.html
The West Coast and New England were Republican. Deep South and Midwest = Democrat. Only the Midwest didn’t flip from then to now.
November 8, 2008 at 4:56 PM #301971vegasrenterParticipantThe phenomenon about flyover country is also somewhat recent. Something I found interesting is that the red state/blue state divide was almost opposite 30 years ago; check out the 1976 electoral map – NOTE: colors are different, blue=republican, red=democrat.
http://www.presidentelect.org/e1976.html
The West Coast and New England were Republican. Deep South and Midwest = Democrat. Only the Midwest didn’t flip from then to now.
November 8, 2008 at 4:56 PM #301977vegasrenterParticipantThe phenomenon about flyover country is also somewhat recent. Something I found interesting is that the red state/blue state divide was almost opposite 30 years ago; check out the 1976 electoral map – NOTE: colors are different, blue=republican, red=democrat.
http://www.presidentelect.org/e1976.html
The West Coast and New England were Republican. Deep South and Midwest = Democrat. Only the Midwest didn’t flip from then to now.
November 8, 2008 at 4:56 PM #301994vegasrenterParticipantThe phenomenon about flyover country is also somewhat recent. Something I found interesting is that the red state/blue state divide was almost opposite 30 years ago; check out the 1976 electoral map – NOTE: colors are different, blue=republican, red=democrat.
http://www.presidentelect.org/e1976.html
The West Coast and New England were Republican. Deep South and Midwest = Democrat. Only the Midwest didn’t flip from then to now.
November 8, 2008 at 4:56 PM #302050vegasrenterParticipantThe phenomenon about flyover country is also somewhat recent. Something I found interesting is that the red state/blue state divide was almost opposite 30 years ago; check out the 1976 electoral map – NOTE: colors are different, blue=republican, red=democrat.
http://www.presidentelect.org/e1976.html
The West Coast and New England were Republican. Deep South and Midwest = Democrat. Only the Midwest didn’t flip from then to now.
November 8, 2008 at 6:54 PM #301632patientlywaitingParticipant[quote=lakehouse] Proposition 8 was the best thing that could have happened to the state of California. Homosexuality is perverted, indecent, unnatural and immoral. Those who engage in it, allow themselves to participate in and perpetrate a corruption of mind, body and soul of the highest order.
[/quote]
I think that, in this regard, we have agreement between a fervent Obama supporter and the fervent right wing of the Republican party.
Interesting events make interesting bedfellows.
November 8, 2008 at 6:54 PM #301991patientlywaitingParticipant[quote=lakehouse] Proposition 8 was the best thing that could have happened to the state of California. Homosexuality is perverted, indecent, unnatural and immoral. Those who engage in it, allow themselves to participate in and perpetrate a corruption of mind, body and soul of the highest order.
[/quote]
I think that, in this regard, we have agreement between a fervent Obama supporter and the fervent right wing of the Republican party.
Interesting events make interesting bedfellows.
November 8, 2008 at 6:54 PM #301997patientlywaitingParticipant[quote=lakehouse] Proposition 8 was the best thing that could have happened to the state of California. Homosexuality is perverted, indecent, unnatural and immoral. Those who engage in it, allow themselves to participate in and perpetrate a corruption of mind, body and soul of the highest order.
[/quote]
I think that, in this regard, we have agreement between a fervent Obama supporter and the fervent right wing of the Republican party.
Interesting events make interesting bedfellows.
November 8, 2008 at 6:54 PM #302014patientlywaitingParticipant[quote=lakehouse] Proposition 8 was the best thing that could have happened to the state of California. Homosexuality is perverted, indecent, unnatural and immoral. Those who engage in it, allow themselves to participate in and perpetrate a corruption of mind, body and soul of the highest order.
[/quote]
I think that, in this regard, we have agreement between a fervent Obama supporter and the fervent right wing of the Republican party.
Interesting events make interesting bedfellows.
November 8, 2008 at 6:54 PM #302070patientlywaitingParticipant[quote=lakehouse] Proposition 8 was the best thing that could have happened to the state of California. Homosexuality is perverted, indecent, unnatural and immoral. Those who engage in it, allow themselves to participate in and perpetrate a corruption of mind, body and soul of the highest order.
[/quote]
I think that, in this regard, we have agreement between a fervent Obama supporter and the fervent right wing of the Republican party.
Interesting events make interesting bedfellows.
November 8, 2008 at 6:58 PM #301637AnonymousGuestIt seems that lakehouse wants the government to FORCE its citizens to be their brothers keeper. That is slavery in my book, and no different than when the Christian churches of the middle ages “tended their flock of sheep.” Enslaving the rich to the poor and needy is no more moral than enslaving the poor to the rich. Besides, the rich contribute to charity, the poor merely soak it up, then make more babies to carry on the tradition.
Wouldn’t it be nice if poor people assumed the work ethic and selfish attitudes of the rich?
How about a society where people contribute to charity because they WANT to, not because uncle Sam has the IRS gun in their face? That is ROBBERY, but some simpletons believe in the legend of Robin Hood. Just so you simpletons know, there was no Robin Hood. Nor was there a Tinkerbell or Santa Claus.
Sleep tight.November 8, 2008 at 6:58 PM #301996AnonymousGuestIt seems that lakehouse wants the government to FORCE its citizens to be their brothers keeper. That is slavery in my book, and no different than when the Christian churches of the middle ages “tended their flock of sheep.” Enslaving the rich to the poor and needy is no more moral than enslaving the poor to the rich. Besides, the rich contribute to charity, the poor merely soak it up, then make more babies to carry on the tradition.
Wouldn’t it be nice if poor people assumed the work ethic and selfish attitudes of the rich?
How about a society where people contribute to charity because they WANT to, not because uncle Sam has the IRS gun in their face? That is ROBBERY, but some simpletons believe in the legend of Robin Hood. Just so you simpletons know, there was no Robin Hood. Nor was there a Tinkerbell or Santa Claus.
Sleep tight.November 8, 2008 at 6:58 PM #302002AnonymousGuestIt seems that lakehouse wants the government to FORCE its citizens to be their brothers keeper. That is slavery in my book, and no different than when the Christian churches of the middle ages “tended their flock of sheep.” Enslaving the rich to the poor and needy is no more moral than enslaving the poor to the rich. Besides, the rich contribute to charity, the poor merely soak it up, then make more babies to carry on the tradition.
Wouldn’t it be nice if poor people assumed the work ethic and selfish attitudes of the rich?
How about a society where people contribute to charity because they WANT to, not because uncle Sam has the IRS gun in their face? That is ROBBERY, but some simpletons believe in the legend of Robin Hood. Just so you simpletons know, there was no Robin Hood. Nor was there a Tinkerbell or Santa Claus.
Sleep tight.November 8, 2008 at 6:58 PM #302019AnonymousGuestIt seems that lakehouse wants the government to FORCE its citizens to be their brothers keeper. That is slavery in my book, and no different than when the Christian churches of the middle ages “tended their flock of sheep.” Enslaving the rich to the poor and needy is no more moral than enslaving the poor to the rich. Besides, the rich contribute to charity, the poor merely soak it up, then make more babies to carry on the tradition.
Wouldn’t it be nice if poor people assumed the work ethic and selfish attitudes of the rich?
How about a society where people contribute to charity because they WANT to, not because uncle Sam has the IRS gun in their face? That is ROBBERY, but some simpletons believe in the legend of Robin Hood. Just so you simpletons know, there was no Robin Hood. Nor was there a Tinkerbell or Santa Claus.
Sleep tight. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.