Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Thoughts on this neighborhood
- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by cabal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2010 at 8:16 PM #17117February 26, 2010 at 8:26 PM #518734PCinSDGuest
I had the same question about this property:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100011964-211_S_28th_St_San_Diego_CA_92113
I’m kidding, sort of. I just picked a crappy neighborhood and clicked on the cheapest house. But doesn’t that still seem pretty cheap for that house?
Cabal, you’re looking at some nice pads.
February 26, 2010 at 8:26 PM #519656PCinSDGuestI had the same question about this property:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100011964-211_S_28th_St_San_Diego_CA_92113
I’m kidding, sort of. I just picked a crappy neighborhood and clicked on the cheapest house. But doesn’t that still seem pretty cheap for that house?
Cabal, you’re looking at some nice pads.
February 26, 2010 at 8:26 PM #518876PCinSDGuestI had the same question about this property:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100011964-211_S_28th_St_San_Diego_CA_92113
I’m kidding, sort of. I just picked a crappy neighborhood and clicked on the cheapest house. But doesn’t that still seem pretty cheap for that house?
Cabal, you’re looking at some nice pads.
February 26, 2010 at 8:26 PM #519402PCinSDGuestI had the same question about this property:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100011964-211_S_28th_St_San_Diego_CA_92113
I’m kidding, sort of. I just picked a crappy neighborhood and clicked on the cheapest house. But doesn’t that still seem pretty cheap for that house?
Cabal, you’re looking at some nice pads.
February 26, 2010 at 8:26 PM #519308PCinSDGuestI had the same question about this property:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100011964-211_S_28th_St_San_Diego_CA_92113
I’m kidding, sort of. I just picked a crappy neighborhood and clicked on the cheapest house. But doesn’t that still seem pretty cheap for that house?
Cabal, you’re looking at some nice pads.
February 26, 2010 at 8:54 PM #518739ocrenterParticipantthis neighborhood was first featured on BMIT in ’06 and again in ’08. This is the history of this particular home:
6508 Mesa Norte Dr., Carmel Valley, CA 92130
–4 beds, 4.0 baths, 4,258 sqft on 1.4 acres
–11/2005: purchased for $1.978 million
–the first owner installed a vanishing pool plus other upgrades.
–11/2006: was entertaining offers from $2.490 to $2.690 million
–06/2007: aggressively dropped his wish price and sold for $1.975 millionso it looks like the second owner in ’07 got in trouble and is going for a short sale for $1.75 million.
assuming you got $250k of upgrade in this thing, you are looking at close to $500k off peak and improvements. but the main question is, how much is the bank willing to take, and will you have a better shot at this thing if it goes to auction.
February 26, 2010 at 8:54 PM #519661ocrenterParticipantthis neighborhood was first featured on BMIT in ’06 and again in ’08. This is the history of this particular home:
6508 Mesa Norte Dr., Carmel Valley, CA 92130
–4 beds, 4.0 baths, 4,258 sqft on 1.4 acres
–11/2005: purchased for $1.978 million
–the first owner installed a vanishing pool plus other upgrades.
–11/2006: was entertaining offers from $2.490 to $2.690 million
–06/2007: aggressively dropped his wish price and sold for $1.975 millionso it looks like the second owner in ’07 got in trouble and is going for a short sale for $1.75 million.
assuming you got $250k of upgrade in this thing, you are looking at close to $500k off peak and improvements. but the main question is, how much is the bank willing to take, and will you have a better shot at this thing if it goes to auction.
February 26, 2010 at 8:54 PM #518881ocrenterParticipantthis neighborhood was first featured on BMIT in ’06 and again in ’08. This is the history of this particular home:
6508 Mesa Norte Dr., Carmel Valley, CA 92130
–4 beds, 4.0 baths, 4,258 sqft on 1.4 acres
–11/2005: purchased for $1.978 million
–the first owner installed a vanishing pool plus other upgrades.
–11/2006: was entertaining offers from $2.490 to $2.690 million
–06/2007: aggressively dropped his wish price and sold for $1.975 millionso it looks like the second owner in ’07 got in trouble and is going for a short sale for $1.75 million.
assuming you got $250k of upgrade in this thing, you are looking at close to $500k off peak and improvements. but the main question is, how much is the bank willing to take, and will you have a better shot at this thing if it goes to auction.
February 26, 2010 at 8:54 PM #519407ocrenterParticipantthis neighborhood was first featured on BMIT in ’06 and again in ’08. This is the history of this particular home:
6508 Mesa Norte Dr., Carmel Valley, CA 92130
–4 beds, 4.0 baths, 4,258 sqft on 1.4 acres
–11/2005: purchased for $1.978 million
–the first owner installed a vanishing pool plus other upgrades.
–11/2006: was entertaining offers from $2.490 to $2.690 million
–06/2007: aggressively dropped his wish price and sold for $1.975 millionso it looks like the second owner in ’07 got in trouble and is going for a short sale for $1.75 million.
assuming you got $250k of upgrade in this thing, you are looking at close to $500k off peak and improvements. but the main question is, how much is the bank willing to take, and will you have a better shot at this thing if it goes to auction.
February 26, 2010 at 8:54 PM #519313ocrenterParticipantthis neighborhood was first featured on BMIT in ’06 and again in ’08. This is the history of this particular home:
6508 Mesa Norte Dr., Carmel Valley, CA 92130
–4 beds, 4.0 baths, 4,258 sqft on 1.4 acres
–11/2005: purchased for $1.978 million
–the first owner installed a vanishing pool plus other upgrades.
–11/2006: was entertaining offers from $2.490 to $2.690 million
–06/2007: aggressively dropped his wish price and sold for $1.975 millionso it looks like the second owner in ’07 got in trouble and is going for a short sale for $1.75 million.
assuming you got $250k of upgrade in this thing, you are looking at close to $500k off peak and improvements. but the main question is, how much is the bank willing to take, and will you have a better shot at this thing if it goes to auction.
February 26, 2010 at 9:13 PM #519318SD RealtorParticipantCabal we actually discussed this very neighborhood but it was back in 2008. I had a client who put an offer down on the home at 6473 Mesa Norte. That is the one with the super long driveway. My client ended up getting outbid by about 25k. That home went for 1.775 and is 1200 sf larger then 6508. Now 6508 is a bit further down the cul de sac then 6532 which is contingent at 1.695…
As for the neighborhood? Well yeah I think I could put up with it… Seriously though, yes nice neighborhood. I have not been out there since the Mesa Norte offer back in 08 and honestly I don’t recall if there was 56 noise up the canyon. On that side of Mesa Norte there would be less then the other side.
Really though they are nice places. I do think they will still depreciate because they are predominantly new money and that is the riskiest type.
February 26, 2010 at 9:13 PM #519666SD RealtorParticipantCabal we actually discussed this very neighborhood but it was back in 2008. I had a client who put an offer down on the home at 6473 Mesa Norte. That is the one with the super long driveway. My client ended up getting outbid by about 25k. That home went for 1.775 and is 1200 sf larger then 6508. Now 6508 is a bit further down the cul de sac then 6532 which is contingent at 1.695…
As for the neighborhood? Well yeah I think I could put up with it… Seriously though, yes nice neighborhood. I have not been out there since the Mesa Norte offer back in 08 and honestly I don’t recall if there was 56 noise up the canyon. On that side of Mesa Norte there would be less then the other side.
Really though they are nice places. I do think they will still depreciate because they are predominantly new money and that is the riskiest type.
February 26, 2010 at 9:13 PM #519412SD RealtorParticipantCabal we actually discussed this very neighborhood but it was back in 2008. I had a client who put an offer down on the home at 6473 Mesa Norte. That is the one with the super long driveway. My client ended up getting outbid by about 25k. That home went for 1.775 and is 1200 sf larger then 6508. Now 6508 is a bit further down the cul de sac then 6532 which is contingent at 1.695…
As for the neighborhood? Well yeah I think I could put up with it… Seriously though, yes nice neighborhood. I have not been out there since the Mesa Norte offer back in 08 and honestly I don’t recall if there was 56 noise up the canyon. On that side of Mesa Norte there would be less then the other side.
Really though they are nice places. I do think they will still depreciate because they are predominantly new money and that is the riskiest type.
February 26, 2010 at 9:13 PM #518886SD RealtorParticipantCabal we actually discussed this very neighborhood but it was back in 2008. I had a client who put an offer down on the home at 6473 Mesa Norte. That is the one with the super long driveway. My client ended up getting outbid by about 25k. That home went for 1.775 and is 1200 sf larger then 6508. Now 6508 is a bit further down the cul de sac then 6532 which is contingent at 1.695…
As for the neighborhood? Well yeah I think I could put up with it… Seriously though, yes nice neighborhood. I have not been out there since the Mesa Norte offer back in 08 and honestly I don’t recall if there was 56 noise up the canyon. On that side of Mesa Norte there would be less then the other side.
Really though they are nice places. I do think they will still depreciate because they are predominantly new money and that is the riskiest type.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.