- This topic has 65 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by TheBreeze.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 19, 2008 at 12:51 AM #242782July 19, 2008 at 7:22 AM #242843SD RealtorParticipant
There is not a doubt that CV has fallen a bit. Once more the axiom holds for attached falling quite a bit harder then detached, at least thus far. FLU has shown us alot of data in previous posts that backs this up. I am also disappointed by the rate of decline in CV and kind of agree with your thought FLU that how could anyone pay 848k for a place like this. Are you kidding me? However, let’s hold our thoughts until close of escrow and see what happens.
Also Landfair is in the heights which is old CV and is one of the few places with no MR and a reasonable HOA. Yes FLU you would have seen me in line for sure.
July 19, 2008 at 7:22 AM #242849SD RealtorParticipantThere is not a doubt that CV has fallen a bit. Once more the axiom holds for attached falling quite a bit harder then detached, at least thus far. FLU has shown us alot of data in previous posts that backs this up. I am also disappointed by the rate of decline in CV and kind of agree with your thought FLU that how could anyone pay 848k for a place like this. Are you kidding me? However, let’s hold our thoughts until close of escrow and see what happens.
Also Landfair is in the heights which is old CV and is one of the few places with no MR and a reasonable HOA. Yes FLU you would have seen me in line for sure.
July 19, 2008 at 7:22 AM #242778SD RealtorParticipantThere is not a doubt that CV has fallen a bit. Once more the axiom holds for attached falling quite a bit harder then detached, at least thus far. FLU has shown us alot of data in previous posts that backs this up. I am also disappointed by the rate of decline in CV and kind of agree with your thought FLU that how could anyone pay 848k for a place like this. Are you kidding me? However, let’s hold our thoughts until close of escrow and see what happens.
Also Landfair is in the heights which is old CV and is one of the few places with no MR and a reasonable HOA. Yes FLU you would have seen me in line for sure.
July 19, 2008 at 7:22 AM #242640SD RealtorParticipantThere is not a doubt that CV has fallen a bit. Once more the axiom holds for attached falling quite a bit harder then detached, at least thus far. FLU has shown us alot of data in previous posts that backs this up. I am also disappointed by the rate of decline in CV and kind of agree with your thought FLU that how could anyone pay 848k for a place like this. Are you kidding me? However, let’s hold our thoughts until close of escrow and see what happens.
Also Landfair is in the heights which is old CV and is one of the few places with no MR and a reasonable HOA. Yes FLU you would have seen me in line for sure.
July 19, 2008 at 7:22 AM #242786SD RealtorParticipantThere is not a doubt that CV has fallen a bit. Once more the axiom holds for attached falling quite a bit harder then detached, at least thus far. FLU has shown us alot of data in previous posts that backs this up. I am also disappointed by the rate of decline in CV and kind of agree with your thought FLU that how could anyone pay 848k for a place like this. Are you kidding me? However, let’s hold our thoughts until close of escrow and see what happens.
Also Landfair is in the heights which is old CV and is one of the few places with no MR and a reasonable HOA. Yes FLU you would have seen me in line for sure.
July 19, 2008 at 9:16 AM #242830bsrsharmaParticipantThe home is pending at 848k
Does that mean someone has obtained a mortgage for that? (assuming it is not a cash heavy transaction). Seems improbable with the way jumbo market is cautious now.
Why did the sellers let it slide into NOD/NOT, if they could sell at a higher price than $400K and walk away pocketing some money (and keeping their credit intact)? Since that did not happen, there is some mess somewhere: may be it is over HELOC’d or mortgages are difficult to get or the market might have buckled.
July 19, 2008 at 9:16 AM #242837bsrsharmaParticipantThe home is pending at 848k
Does that mean someone has obtained a mortgage for that? (assuming it is not a cash heavy transaction). Seems improbable with the way jumbo market is cautious now.
Why did the sellers let it slide into NOD/NOT, if they could sell at a higher price than $400K and walk away pocketing some money (and keeping their credit intact)? Since that did not happen, there is some mess somewhere: may be it is over HELOC’d or mortgages are difficult to get or the market might have buckled.
July 19, 2008 at 9:16 AM #242689bsrsharmaParticipantThe home is pending at 848k
Does that mean someone has obtained a mortgage for that? (assuming it is not a cash heavy transaction). Seems improbable with the way jumbo market is cautious now.
Why did the sellers let it slide into NOD/NOT, if they could sell at a higher price than $400K and walk away pocketing some money (and keeping their credit intact)? Since that did not happen, there is some mess somewhere: may be it is over HELOC’d or mortgages are difficult to get or the market might have buckled.
July 19, 2008 at 9:16 AM #242893bsrsharmaParticipantThe home is pending at 848k
Does that mean someone has obtained a mortgage for that? (assuming it is not a cash heavy transaction). Seems improbable with the way jumbo market is cautious now.
Why did the sellers let it slide into NOD/NOT, if they could sell at a higher price than $400K and walk away pocketing some money (and keeping their credit intact)? Since that did not happen, there is some mess somewhere: may be it is over HELOC’d or mortgages are difficult to get or the market might have buckled.
July 19, 2008 at 9:16 AM #242900bsrsharmaParticipantThe home is pending at 848k
Does that mean someone has obtained a mortgage for that? (assuming it is not a cash heavy transaction). Seems improbable with the way jumbo market is cautious now.
Why did the sellers let it slide into NOD/NOT, if they could sell at a higher price than $400K and walk away pocketing some money (and keeping their credit intact)? Since that did not happen, there is some mess somewhere: may be it is over HELOC’d or mortgages are difficult to get or the market might have buckled.
July 19, 2008 at 11:24 PM #242998SD RealtorParticipantAye caramba…come on now are you kidding me? Of course they played the atm card, that is why they are losing the home. However your insistence that the entire mortgage market is currently locked up is something with which I entirely disagree.
Tell you what… let’s see what it closes at and then we can waste more time on this thread.
July 19, 2008 at 11:24 PM #243145SD RealtorParticipantAye caramba…come on now are you kidding me? Of course they played the atm card, that is why they are losing the home. However your insistence that the entire mortgage market is currently locked up is something with which I entirely disagree.
Tell you what… let’s see what it closes at and then we can waste more time on this thread.
July 19, 2008 at 11:24 PM #243153SD RealtorParticipantAye caramba…come on now are you kidding me? Of course they played the atm card, that is why they are losing the home. However your insistence that the entire mortgage market is currently locked up is something with which I entirely disagree.
Tell you what… let’s see what it closes at and then we can waste more time on this thread.
July 19, 2008 at 11:24 PM #243216SD RealtorParticipantAye caramba…come on now are you kidding me? Of course they played the atm card, that is why they are losing the home. However your insistence that the entire mortgage market is currently locked up is something with which I entirely disagree.
Tell you what… let’s see what it closes at and then we can waste more time on this thread.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.