Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The Goldman Sachs future prediction machine
- This topic has 55 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by blahblahblah.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 2, 2010 at 4:51 PM #558863June 3, 2010 at 9:04 PM #560354jpinpbParticipant
From what I’m able to gather, that is a filing from March 31. It encompasses all trading from the entire quarter. It could have been sold on Jan 2 or March 30 (or 300,000 shares a day for weeks), the filing would LOOK the same.
I am not saying they didn’t have an underwater device set up in the Gulf to detect any seismic activity in order to warn them of impending disaster, but in all likelihood it has nothing to do with the explosion, which occurred in late April.
June 3, 2010 at 9:04 PM #559473jpinpbParticipantFrom what I’m able to gather, that is a filing from March 31. It encompasses all trading from the entire quarter. It could have been sold on Jan 2 or March 30 (or 300,000 shares a day for weeks), the filing would LOOK the same.
I am not saying they didn’t have an underwater device set up in the Gulf to detect any seismic activity in order to warn them of impending disaster, but in all likelihood it has nothing to do with the explosion, which occurred in late April.
June 3, 2010 at 9:04 PM #559370jpinpbParticipantFrom what I’m able to gather, that is a filing from March 31. It encompasses all trading from the entire quarter. It could have been sold on Jan 2 or March 30 (or 300,000 shares a day for weeks), the filing would LOOK the same.
I am not saying they didn’t have an underwater device set up in the Gulf to detect any seismic activity in order to warn them of impending disaster, but in all likelihood it has nothing to do with the explosion, which occurred in late April.
June 3, 2010 at 9:04 PM #560073jpinpbParticipantFrom what I’m able to gather, that is a filing from March 31. It encompasses all trading from the entire quarter. It could have been sold on Jan 2 or March 30 (or 300,000 shares a day for weeks), the filing would LOOK the same.
I am not saying they didn’t have an underwater device set up in the Gulf to detect any seismic activity in order to warn them of impending disaster, but in all likelihood it has nothing to do with the explosion, which occurred in late April.
June 3, 2010 at 9:04 PM #559970jpinpbParticipantFrom what I’m able to gather, that is a filing from March 31. It encompasses all trading from the entire quarter. It could have been sold on Jan 2 or March 30 (or 300,000 shares a day for weeks), the filing would LOOK the same.
I am not saying they didn’t have an underwater device set up in the Gulf to detect any seismic activity in order to warn them of impending disaster, but in all likelihood it has nothing to do with the explosion, which occurred in late April.
June 4, 2010 at 9:05 AM #560512blahblahblahParticipantThat is a huge move in a single quarter – 5M shares sold in only 60 days of trading. Of course they’re not going to dump it all in a single day, there wouldn’t be enough buyers. No other major holder has anything similar. Also check out XOM for the same period, there are no big moves out of the stock.
It is just a coincidence, but an interesting one. No need to look further, it will never be investigated.
June 4, 2010 at 9:05 AM #560232blahblahblahParticipantThat is a huge move in a single quarter – 5M shares sold in only 60 days of trading. Of course they’re not going to dump it all in a single day, there wouldn’t be enough buyers. No other major holder has anything similar. Also check out XOM for the same period, there are no big moves out of the stock.
It is just a coincidence, but an interesting one. No need to look further, it will never be investigated.
June 4, 2010 at 9:05 AM #560129blahblahblahParticipantThat is a huge move in a single quarter – 5M shares sold in only 60 days of trading. Of course they’re not going to dump it all in a single day, there wouldn’t be enough buyers. No other major holder has anything similar. Also check out XOM for the same period, there are no big moves out of the stock.
It is just a coincidence, but an interesting one. No need to look further, it will never be investigated.
June 4, 2010 at 9:05 AM #559633blahblahblahParticipantThat is a huge move in a single quarter – 5M shares sold in only 60 days of trading. Of course they’re not going to dump it all in a single day, there wouldn’t be enough buyers. No other major holder has anything similar. Also check out XOM for the same period, there are no big moves out of the stock.
It is just a coincidence, but an interesting one. No need to look further, it will never be investigated.
June 4, 2010 at 9:05 AM #559531blahblahblahParticipantThat is a huge move in a single quarter – 5M shares sold in only 60 days of trading. Of course they’re not going to dump it all in a single day, there wouldn’t be enough buyers. No other major holder has anything similar. Also check out XOM for the same period, there are no big moves out of the stock.
It is just a coincidence, but an interesting one. No need to look further, it will never be investigated.
June 4, 2010 at 12:03 PM #559658jpinpbParticipantI am curious/wondering if GS is doing any short selling of BP.
Edit: Doing some checking, right on the link that’s referenced, it shows that this sale represented 0.4% of their total portfolio .. that is less than one half percent.
From what I gather, 3 months would be a long time to move out of 4.5 million shares–there are blocks larger than that which change hands regularly in a single trade among large institutional investors, like GSAM.
Edit 2: Also, GS is a holding company – they buy & sell shares not only for their own accounts, but for customers too. So while they did sell, they may not have necessarily benefitted. It would be interesting to see which of their clients did. Definitely prescient to have sold at such an opportune time.
June 4, 2010 at 12:03 PM #560154jpinpbParticipantI am curious/wondering if GS is doing any short selling of BP.
Edit: Doing some checking, right on the link that’s referenced, it shows that this sale represented 0.4% of their total portfolio .. that is less than one half percent.
From what I gather, 3 months would be a long time to move out of 4.5 million shares–there are blocks larger than that which change hands regularly in a single trade among large institutional investors, like GSAM.
Edit 2: Also, GS is a holding company – they buy & sell shares not only for their own accounts, but for customers too. So while they did sell, they may not have necessarily benefitted. It would be interesting to see which of their clients did. Definitely prescient to have sold at such an opportune time.
June 4, 2010 at 12:03 PM #560257jpinpbParticipantI am curious/wondering if GS is doing any short selling of BP.
Edit: Doing some checking, right on the link that’s referenced, it shows that this sale represented 0.4% of their total portfolio .. that is less than one half percent.
From what I gather, 3 months would be a long time to move out of 4.5 million shares–there are blocks larger than that which change hands regularly in a single trade among large institutional investors, like GSAM.
Edit 2: Also, GS is a holding company – they buy & sell shares not only for their own accounts, but for customers too. So while they did sell, they may not have necessarily benefitted. It would be interesting to see which of their clients did. Definitely prescient to have sold at such an opportune time.
June 4, 2010 at 12:03 PM #560537jpinpbParticipantI am curious/wondering if GS is doing any short selling of BP.
Edit: Doing some checking, right on the link that’s referenced, it shows that this sale represented 0.4% of their total portfolio .. that is less than one half percent.
From what I gather, 3 months would be a long time to move out of 4.5 million shares–there are blocks larger than that which change hands regularly in a single trade among large institutional investors, like GSAM.
Edit 2: Also, GS is a holding company – they buy & sell shares not only for their own accounts, but for customers too. So while they did sell, they may not have necessarily benefitted. It would be interesting to see which of their clients did. Definitely prescient to have sold at such an opportune time.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.