Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › TAX TAX TAX and more TAX
- This topic has 765 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM #543311April 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM #542354
afx114
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]The gov must have some revenue stream other than taxes.[/quote]
Yeah, it’s called China.
April 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM #542469Participant[quote=sdduuuude]The gov must have some revenue stream other than taxes.[/quote]
Yeah, it’s called China.
April 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM #542946Participant[quote=sdduuuude]The gov must have some revenue stream other than taxes.[/quote]
Yeah, it’s called China.
April 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM #543040Participant[quote=sdduuuude]The gov must have some revenue stream other than taxes.[/quote]
Yeah, it’s called China.
April 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM #543316Participant[quote=sdduuuude]The gov must have some revenue stream other than taxes.[/quote]
Yeah, it’s called China.
April 22, 2010 at 2:55 PM #542334briansd1
Guest[quote=sdduuuude]
You are using a term with a specific meaning – i.e. “progressive tax” to mean something that you want it to mean. It has nothing to do with what you give or get from society.
[/quote]Progressive taxation takes into account income and/or wealth.
An income tax is different from a consumption tax.
I won’t debate with you. But you should talk to some economists.
*
To me, a fair tax is one where a group who makes 50% of the income and/or owns 50% of the wealth should pay 50% of the taxes (expenses) that make society operate.
That’s pretty much how Americans run their households.
If the wife makes 70% of the income and the husband makes 30% of the income, the wife would pay roughly 70% of the expenses of running the household. When money is pooled, it generally works out that way out of necessity.
April 22, 2010 at 2:55 PM #542449Guest[quote=sdduuuude]
You are using a term with a specific meaning – i.e. “progressive tax” to mean something that you want it to mean. It has nothing to do with what you give or get from society.
[/quote]Progressive taxation takes into account income and/or wealth.
An income tax is different from a consumption tax.
I won’t debate with you. But you should talk to some economists.
*
To me, a fair tax is one where a group who makes 50% of the income and/or owns 50% of the wealth should pay 50% of the taxes (expenses) that make society operate.
That’s pretty much how Americans run their households.
If the wife makes 70% of the income and the husband makes 30% of the income, the wife would pay roughly 70% of the expenses of running the household. When money is pooled, it generally works out that way out of necessity.
April 22, 2010 at 2:55 PM #542926Guest[quote=sdduuuude]
You are using a term with a specific meaning – i.e. “progressive tax” to mean something that you want it to mean. It has nothing to do with what you give or get from society.
[/quote]Progressive taxation takes into account income and/or wealth.
An income tax is different from a consumption tax.
I won’t debate with you. But you should talk to some economists.
*
To me, a fair tax is one where a group who makes 50% of the income and/or owns 50% of the wealth should pay 50% of the taxes (expenses) that make society operate.
That’s pretty much how Americans run their households.
If the wife makes 70% of the income and the husband makes 30% of the income, the wife would pay roughly 70% of the expenses of running the household. When money is pooled, it generally works out that way out of necessity.
April 22, 2010 at 2:55 PM #543019Guest[quote=sdduuuude]
You are using a term with a specific meaning – i.e. “progressive tax” to mean something that you want it to mean. It has nothing to do with what you give or get from society.
[/quote]Progressive taxation takes into account income and/or wealth.
An income tax is different from a consumption tax.
I won’t debate with you. But you should talk to some economists.
*
To me, a fair tax is one where a group who makes 50% of the income and/or owns 50% of the wealth should pay 50% of the taxes (expenses) that make society operate.
That’s pretty much how Americans run their households.
If the wife makes 70% of the income and the husband makes 30% of the income, the wife would pay roughly 70% of the expenses of running the household. When money is pooled, it generally works out that way out of necessity.
April 22, 2010 at 2:55 PM #543296Guest[quote=sdduuuude]
You are using a term with a specific meaning – i.e. “progressive tax” to mean something that you want it to mean. It has nothing to do with what you give or get from society.
[/quote]Progressive taxation takes into account income and/or wealth.
An income tax is different from a consumption tax.
I won’t debate with you. But you should talk to some economists.
*
To me, a fair tax is one where a group who makes 50% of the income and/or owns 50% of the wealth should pay 50% of the taxes (expenses) that make society operate.
That’s pretty much how Americans run their households.
If the wife makes 70% of the income and the husband makes 30% of the income, the wife would pay roughly 70% of the expenses of running the household. When money is pooled, it generally works out that way out of necessity.
April 22, 2010 at 2:59 PM #542359Hobie
Participant[quote=briansd1]
If the wife makes 70% of the income and the husband makes 30% of the income, the wife would pay roughly 70% of the expenses of running the household. When money is pooled, it generally works out that way out of necessity.[/quote]
Oh Brian, bet if you were married and tried this you would get 70% less sex 😉
April 22, 2010 at 2:59 PM #542474Participant[quote=briansd1]
If the wife makes 70% of the income and the husband makes 30% of the income, the wife would pay roughly 70% of the expenses of running the household. When money is pooled, it generally works out that way out of necessity.[/quote]
Oh Brian, bet if you were married and tried this you would get 70% less sex 😉
April 22, 2010 at 2:59 PM #542951Participant[quote=briansd1]
If the wife makes 70% of the income and the husband makes 30% of the income, the wife would pay roughly 70% of the expenses of running the household. When money is pooled, it generally works out that way out of necessity.[/quote]
Oh Brian, bet if you were married and tried this you would get 70% less sex 😉
April 22, 2010 at 2:59 PM #543045Participant[quote=briansd1]
If the wife makes 70% of the income and the husband makes 30% of the income, the wife would pay roughly 70% of the expenses of running the household. When money is pooled, it generally works out that way out of necessity.[/quote]
Oh Brian, bet if you were married and tried this you would get 70% less sex 😉
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.