- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 3, 2008 at 1:46 PM #13186July 3, 2008 at 3:08 PM #232717nooneParticipant
There’s really not enough information in that article.
Though there are some types of loans that would only go up about $70 per month if they reset now, those same loans would only have gone up about $70 if they reset in December. The type of loans that would have reset by $450 in December will still reset by about $450. The mortgage interest rates have hardly changed. They were down at the beginning of the year, but are back up now. Some mortgage rates are even higher than they were in December
http://mortgage-x.com/trends.htm
Even the next paragraph in that article says “others still face a rate shock because they had an artificially low introductory rate”
Those loans that are going up by several percentage points are doing so because they started out with the “teaser” rates that the article mentions. You are correct that the interest rate on ARMs continue to fluctuate even after the introductory period, generally this is annually. The interest rate changes after the introductory period will not be as great. Usually there is a cap on how much the difference can be from one year to the next regardless of what the prime rate does.
So basically if the borrower can survive the initial large jump, then it is likely that they can survive the smaller increases (or decreases) that come in the future.
July 3, 2008 at 3:08 PM #232843nooneParticipantThere’s really not enough information in that article.
Though there are some types of loans that would only go up about $70 per month if they reset now, those same loans would only have gone up about $70 if they reset in December. The type of loans that would have reset by $450 in December will still reset by about $450. The mortgage interest rates have hardly changed. They were down at the beginning of the year, but are back up now. Some mortgage rates are even higher than they were in December
http://mortgage-x.com/trends.htm
Even the next paragraph in that article says “others still face a rate shock because they had an artificially low introductory rate”
Those loans that are going up by several percentage points are doing so because they started out with the “teaser” rates that the article mentions. You are correct that the interest rate on ARMs continue to fluctuate even after the introductory period, generally this is annually. The interest rate changes after the introductory period will not be as great. Usually there is a cap on how much the difference can be from one year to the next regardless of what the prime rate does.
So basically if the borrower can survive the initial large jump, then it is likely that they can survive the smaller increases (or decreases) that come in the future.
July 3, 2008 at 3:08 PM #232854nooneParticipantThere’s really not enough information in that article.
Though there are some types of loans that would only go up about $70 per month if they reset now, those same loans would only have gone up about $70 if they reset in December. The type of loans that would have reset by $450 in December will still reset by about $450. The mortgage interest rates have hardly changed. They were down at the beginning of the year, but are back up now. Some mortgage rates are even higher than they were in December
http://mortgage-x.com/trends.htm
Even the next paragraph in that article says “others still face a rate shock because they had an artificially low introductory rate”
Those loans that are going up by several percentage points are doing so because they started out with the “teaser” rates that the article mentions. You are correct that the interest rate on ARMs continue to fluctuate even after the introductory period, generally this is annually. The interest rate changes after the introductory period will not be as great. Usually there is a cap on how much the difference can be from one year to the next regardless of what the prime rate does.
So basically if the borrower can survive the initial large jump, then it is likely that they can survive the smaller increases (or decreases) that come in the future.
July 3, 2008 at 3:08 PM #232894nooneParticipantThere’s really not enough information in that article.
Though there are some types of loans that would only go up about $70 per month if they reset now, those same loans would only have gone up about $70 if they reset in December. The type of loans that would have reset by $450 in December will still reset by about $450. The mortgage interest rates have hardly changed. They were down at the beginning of the year, but are back up now. Some mortgage rates are even higher than they were in December
http://mortgage-x.com/trends.htm
Even the next paragraph in that article says “others still face a rate shock because they had an artificially low introductory rate”
Those loans that are going up by several percentage points are doing so because they started out with the “teaser” rates that the article mentions. You are correct that the interest rate on ARMs continue to fluctuate even after the introductory period, generally this is annually. The interest rate changes after the introductory period will not be as great. Usually there is a cap on how much the difference can be from one year to the next regardless of what the prime rate does.
So basically if the borrower can survive the initial large jump, then it is likely that they can survive the smaller increases (or decreases) that come in the future.
July 3, 2008 at 3:08 PM #232905nooneParticipantThere’s really not enough information in that article.
Though there are some types of loans that would only go up about $70 per month if they reset now, those same loans would only have gone up about $70 if they reset in December. The type of loans that would have reset by $450 in December will still reset by about $450. The mortgage interest rates have hardly changed. They were down at the beginning of the year, but are back up now. Some mortgage rates are even higher than they were in December
http://mortgage-x.com/trends.htm
Even the next paragraph in that article says “others still face a rate shock because they had an artificially low introductory rate”
Those loans that are going up by several percentage points are doing so because they started out with the “teaser” rates that the article mentions. You are correct that the interest rate on ARMs continue to fluctuate even after the introductory period, generally this is annually. The interest rate changes after the introductory period will not be as great. Usually there is a cap on how much the difference can be from one year to the next regardless of what the prime rate does.
So basically if the borrower can survive the initial large jump, then it is likely that they can survive the smaller increases (or decreases) that come in the future.
July 3, 2008 at 8:44 PM #232799patbParticipantThis article was poorly written, because it failed to explain how
a subprime ARM works.What happens is that instead of getting 30 year money
an ARM uses short term money 12-24 month money so it
requires continous rolling resets.The hazard is bernanke has been forcing short term rates
into the sewer. Once those rates rise again, ARM holders will
find themselves screwed again.Bernanke is desperately trying to help wall street out,
for now.July 3, 2008 at 8:44 PM #232922patbParticipantThis article was poorly written, because it failed to explain how
a subprime ARM works.What happens is that instead of getting 30 year money
an ARM uses short term money 12-24 month money so it
requires continous rolling resets.The hazard is bernanke has been forcing short term rates
into the sewer. Once those rates rise again, ARM holders will
find themselves screwed again.Bernanke is desperately trying to help wall street out,
for now.July 3, 2008 at 8:44 PM #232934patbParticipantThis article was poorly written, because it failed to explain how
a subprime ARM works.What happens is that instead of getting 30 year money
an ARM uses short term money 12-24 month money so it
requires continous rolling resets.The hazard is bernanke has been forcing short term rates
into the sewer. Once those rates rise again, ARM holders will
find themselves screwed again.Bernanke is desperately trying to help wall street out,
for now.July 3, 2008 at 8:44 PM #232973patbParticipantThis article was poorly written, because it failed to explain how
a subprime ARM works.What happens is that instead of getting 30 year money
an ARM uses short term money 12-24 month money so it
requires continous rolling resets.The hazard is bernanke has been forcing short term rates
into the sewer. Once those rates rise again, ARM holders will
find themselves screwed again.Bernanke is desperately trying to help wall street out,
for now.July 3, 2008 at 8:44 PM #232985patbParticipantThis article was poorly written, because it failed to explain how
a subprime ARM works.What happens is that instead of getting 30 year money
an ARM uses short term money 12-24 month money so it
requires continous rolling resets.The hazard is bernanke has been forcing short term rates
into the sewer. Once those rates rise again, ARM holders will
find themselves screwed again.Bernanke is desperately trying to help wall street out,
for now. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.