Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Refinance?
- This topic has 15 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by HLS.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 3, 2009 at 12:37 PM #14744January 3, 2009 at 12:53 PM #323233HLSParticipant
If you cannot document your income to meet guidelines and qualify, you have no chance of refinancing to a FNMA loan.
Rates are around 5% today, but there are no stated income programs that I am aware of at this rate.
It can’t hurt to talk to your current lender…HLS
January 3, 2009 at 12:53 PM #323572HLSParticipantIf you cannot document your income to meet guidelines and qualify, you have no chance of refinancing to a FNMA loan.
Rates are around 5% today, but there are no stated income programs that I am aware of at this rate.
It can’t hurt to talk to your current lender…HLS
January 3, 2009 at 12:53 PM #323635HLSParticipantIf you cannot document your income to meet guidelines and qualify, you have no chance of refinancing to a FNMA loan.
Rates are around 5% today, but there are no stated income programs that I am aware of at this rate.
It can’t hurt to talk to your current lender…HLS
January 3, 2009 at 12:53 PM #323651HLSParticipantIf you cannot document your income to meet guidelines and qualify, you have no chance of refinancing to a FNMA loan.
Rates are around 5% today, but there are no stated income programs that I am aware of at this rate.
It can’t hurt to talk to your current lender…HLS
January 3, 2009 at 12:53 PM #323732HLSParticipantIf you cannot document your income to meet guidelines and qualify, you have no chance of refinancing to a FNMA loan.
Rates are around 5% today, but there are no stated income programs that I am aware of at this rate.
It can’t hurt to talk to your current lender…HLS
January 3, 2009 at 1:40 PM #323238economissedParticipantHLS:
Thanks for the reply. How much would I need to document assuming approx. 143,000 loan, with about $150/mo in other debt obligations? What would be sufficient documentation? (e.g. paystubs, tax returns, etc.)
Are there no programs that would put much more weight on LTV and FICO? At October’s numbers I had an estimated LTV of about 68%, I realize the market may have dropped a bit since then but with additional sweat equity and the small amount of principal put into the home, I think I’m still at least at about the same LTV currently.
January 3, 2009 at 1:40 PM #323577economissedParticipantHLS:
Thanks for the reply. How much would I need to document assuming approx. 143,000 loan, with about $150/mo in other debt obligations? What would be sufficient documentation? (e.g. paystubs, tax returns, etc.)
Are there no programs that would put much more weight on LTV and FICO? At October’s numbers I had an estimated LTV of about 68%, I realize the market may have dropped a bit since then but with additional sweat equity and the small amount of principal put into the home, I think I’m still at least at about the same LTV currently.
January 3, 2009 at 1:40 PM #323640economissedParticipantHLS:
Thanks for the reply. How much would I need to document assuming approx. 143,000 loan, with about $150/mo in other debt obligations? What would be sufficient documentation? (e.g. paystubs, tax returns, etc.)
Are there no programs that would put much more weight on LTV and FICO? At October’s numbers I had an estimated LTV of about 68%, I realize the market may have dropped a bit since then but with additional sweat equity and the small amount of principal put into the home, I think I’m still at least at about the same LTV currently.
January 3, 2009 at 1:40 PM #323656economissedParticipantHLS:
Thanks for the reply. How much would I need to document assuming approx. 143,000 loan, with about $150/mo in other debt obligations? What would be sufficient documentation? (e.g. paystubs, tax returns, etc.)
Are there no programs that would put much more weight on LTV and FICO? At October’s numbers I had an estimated LTV of about 68%, I realize the market may have dropped a bit since then but with additional sweat equity and the small amount of principal put into the home, I think I’m still at least at about the same LTV currently.
January 3, 2009 at 1:40 PM #323737economissedParticipantHLS:
Thanks for the reply. How much would I need to document assuming approx. 143,000 loan, with about $150/mo in other debt obligations? What would be sufficient documentation? (e.g. paystubs, tax returns, etc.)
Are there no programs that would put much more weight on LTV and FICO? At October’s numbers I had an estimated LTV of about 68%, I realize the market may have dropped a bit since then but with additional sweat equity and the small amount of principal put into the home, I think I’m still at least at about the same LTV currently.
January 3, 2009 at 2:04 PM #323253HLSParticipantYou may need to wait 6 months+ to use a value higher than purchase price,so you have 20%+ equity and avoid mortg ins..otherwise it’s a 90% loan,however you have done improvements.
Common sense is gone. They don’t lend on equity.It’s an automated underwriting system.
For self employed, you probably need 2 years tax returns of steady income. W-2 wage earner with pay stubs may get by with less.
For the numbers you are talking, you will probably need $2000-$2500 a month minimum income.
Are you in CA ?? you can contact me directly if you want for more info.. [email protected]
January 3, 2009 at 2:04 PM #323591HLSParticipantYou may need to wait 6 months+ to use a value higher than purchase price,so you have 20%+ equity and avoid mortg ins..otherwise it’s a 90% loan,however you have done improvements.
Common sense is gone. They don’t lend on equity.It’s an automated underwriting system.
For self employed, you probably need 2 years tax returns of steady income. W-2 wage earner with pay stubs may get by with less.
For the numbers you are talking, you will probably need $2000-$2500 a month minimum income.
Are you in CA ?? you can contact me directly if you want for more info.. [email protected]
January 3, 2009 at 2:04 PM #323655HLSParticipantYou may need to wait 6 months+ to use a value higher than purchase price,so you have 20%+ equity and avoid mortg ins..otherwise it’s a 90% loan,however you have done improvements.
Common sense is gone. They don’t lend on equity.It’s an automated underwriting system.
For self employed, you probably need 2 years tax returns of steady income. W-2 wage earner with pay stubs may get by with less.
For the numbers you are talking, you will probably need $2000-$2500 a month minimum income.
Are you in CA ?? you can contact me directly if you want for more info.. [email protected]
January 3, 2009 at 2:04 PM #323671HLSParticipantYou may need to wait 6 months+ to use a value higher than purchase price,so you have 20%+ equity and avoid mortg ins..otherwise it’s a 90% loan,however you have done improvements.
Common sense is gone. They don’t lend on equity.It’s an automated underwriting system.
For self employed, you probably need 2 years tax returns of steady income. W-2 wage earner with pay stubs may get by with less.
For the numbers you are talking, you will probably need $2000-$2500 a month minimum income.
Are you in CA ?? you can contact me directly if you want for more info.. [email protected]
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.