Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › “Strategic” Default Question
- This topic has 105 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 19, 2010 at 9:42 AM #580961July 19, 2010 at 9:48 AM #579932SD RealtorParticipant
Sure Brian, why don’t you join the poster who posted a few months ago about living like a rockstar while he defaulted. Sounds like a good idea. You may wanna get some credit cards and run them to the max and default on those as well.
Definitely a good estate planning tool.
July 19, 2010 at 9:48 AM #580026SD RealtorParticipantSure Brian, why don’t you join the poster who posted a few months ago about living like a rockstar while he defaulted. Sounds like a good idea. You may wanna get some credit cards and run them to the max and default on those as well.
Definitely a good estate planning tool.
July 19, 2010 at 9:48 AM #580558SD RealtorParticipantSure Brian, why don’t you join the poster who posted a few months ago about living like a rockstar while he defaulted. Sounds like a good idea. You may wanna get some credit cards and run them to the max and default on those as well.
Definitely a good estate planning tool.
July 19, 2010 at 9:48 AM #580662SD RealtorParticipantSure Brian, why don’t you join the poster who posted a few months ago about living like a rockstar while he defaulted. Sounds like a good idea. You may wanna get some credit cards and run them to the max and default on those as well.
Definitely a good estate planning tool.
July 19, 2010 at 9:48 AM #580966SD RealtorParticipantSure Brian, why don’t you join the poster who posted a few months ago about living like a rockstar while he defaulted. Sounds like a good idea. You may wanna get some credit cards and run them to the max and default on those as well.
Definitely a good estate planning tool.
July 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM #579961CoronitaParticipantThe reason why I’m asking this question is (more or less in theory)…
Is this a way to assets to a relative, skipping estate taxes. I understand it’s a naive question, but just curious. Typically, loan forgiveness is a taxable event. But currently, aren’t they more or less not taxable in the current climate? Or am I wrong about this.
Not suggesting to do this is a good thing, just trying to understand.
July 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM #580057CoronitaParticipantThe reason why I’m asking this question is (more or less in theory)…
Is this a way to assets to a relative, skipping estate taxes. I understand it’s a naive question, but just curious. Typically, loan forgiveness is a taxable event. But currently, aren’t they more or less not taxable in the current climate? Or am I wrong about this.
Not suggesting to do this is a good thing, just trying to understand.
July 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM #580588CoronitaParticipantThe reason why I’m asking this question is (more or less in theory)…
Is this a way to assets to a relative, skipping estate taxes. I understand it’s a naive question, but just curious. Typically, loan forgiveness is a taxable event. But currently, aren’t they more or less not taxable in the current climate? Or am I wrong about this.
Not suggesting to do this is a good thing, just trying to understand.
July 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM #580692CoronitaParticipantThe reason why I’m asking this question is (more or less in theory)…
Is this a way to assets to a relative, skipping estate taxes. I understand it’s a naive question, but just curious. Typically, loan forgiveness is a taxable event. But currently, aren’t they more or less not taxable in the current climate? Or am I wrong about this.
Not suggesting to do this is a good thing, just trying to understand.
July 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM #580996CoronitaParticipantThe reason why I’m asking this question is (more or less in theory)…
Is this a way to assets to a relative, skipping estate taxes. I understand it’s a naive question, but just curious. Typically, loan forgiveness is a taxable event. But currently, aren’t they more or less not taxable in the current climate? Or am I wrong about this.
Not suggesting to do this is a good thing, just trying to understand.
July 19, 2010 at 10:39 AM #579966CoronitaParticipant[quote=Cube]If the hypothetical goal here is to have person A effectively buy person X a house, why ever foreclose or forgive the loan? Why not just have person X be in default to person A indefinitely? In fact, why not have person X pay the interest-only amount to person A (while falling in arrears on the full payment) and write of the payments against taxable income? And person A can probably gift most / all of that money back to person X (assuming spouses for each are playing too).[/quote]
I’m more interested in what happens before a distribution of an estate which includes the loan. It would do no good if the beneficiary loan that also owes the debt.
July 19, 2010 at 10:39 AM #580061CoronitaParticipant[quote=Cube]If the hypothetical goal here is to have person A effectively buy person X a house, why ever foreclose or forgive the loan? Why not just have person X be in default to person A indefinitely? In fact, why not have person X pay the interest-only amount to person A (while falling in arrears on the full payment) and write of the payments against taxable income? And person A can probably gift most / all of that money back to person X (assuming spouses for each are playing too).[/quote]
I’m more interested in what happens before a distribution of an estate which includes the loan. It would do no good if the beneficiary loan that also owes the debt.
July 19, 2010 at 10:39 AM #580593CoronitaParticipant[quote=Cube]If the hypothetical goal here is to have person A effectively buy person X a house, why ever foreclose or forgive the loan? Why not just have person X be in default to person A indefinitely? In fact, why not have person X pay the interest-only amount to person A (while falling in arrears on the full payment) and write of the payments against taxable income? And person A can probably gift most / all of that money back to person X (assuming spouses for each are playing too).[/quote]
I’m more interested in what happens before a distribution of an estate which includes the loan. It would do no good if the beneficiary loan that also owes the debt.
July 19, 2010 at 10:39 AM #580697CoronitaParticipant[quote=Cube]If the hypothetical goal here is to have person A effectively buy person X a house, why ever foreclose or forgive the loan? Why not just have person X be in default to person A indefinitely? In fact, why not have person X pay the interest-only amount to person A (while falling in arrears on the full payment) and write of the payments against taxable income? And person A can probably gift most / all of that money back to person X (assuming spouses for each are playing too).[/quote]
I’m more interested in what happens before a distribution of an estate which includes the loan. It would do no good if the beneficiary loan that also owes the debt.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.