- This topic has 80 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 3, 2010 at 9:59 PM #17527June 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM #560000jpinpbParticipant
Looks like she has company. Lorie ZapfSan Diego City Council candidate, who is campaigning on fiscal responsibility, is more than six months behind in payments on a loan that could result in foreclosure on her house.
June 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM #560103jpinpbParticipantLooks like she has company. Lorie ZapfSan Diego City Council candidate, who is campaigning on fiscal responsibility, is more than six months behind in payments on a loan that could result in foreclosure on her house.
June 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM #559503jpinpbParticipantLooks like she has company. Lorie ZapfSan Diego City Council candidate, who is campaigning on fiscal responsibility, is more than six months behind in payments on a loan that could result in foreclosure on her house.
June 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM #560383jpinpbParticipantLooks like she has company. Lorie ZapfSan Diego City Council candidate, who is campaigning on fiscal responsibility, is more than six months behind in payments on a loan that could result in foreclosure on her house.
June 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM #559401jpinpbParticipantLooks like she has company. Lorie ZapfSan Diego City Council candidate, who is campaigning on fiscal responsibility, is more than six months behind in payments on a loan that could result in foreclosure on her house.
June 3, 2010 at 11:21 PM #560397bearishgurlParticipantExcerpts from the VOSD article:
“Jackson purchased the property for $255,000 in July 2002. She then refinanced the property four times over the next four years, the last for $467,500 in November 2006.
Jackson said she “did not have the finances to keep the property” after the state cut funding for her teaching and administrative position with a math program. She said she couldn’t find another local job to supplement her district stipend (the school board is a part-time job that pays $1,500 a month) and Navy pension.”
**************************************************
I don’t know what Jackson’s orig. loan amount was but mine was $244,300 (close to the amt. of her purchase price), which was $91,800 LESS than what I pd. for my property for in 2001. I don’t have a $3,300 – $3,800 mo. pension (Jackson was a Naval Officer) + a $1,500 School Board stipend for a total income of $4,800 – $5,300 month. My mo. income is $1,200 to $1,700 mo. LESS THAN HERS, yet I have managed to “hang-on” without turning my house into an ATM machine (still have orig. “purchase $$ loan” and no others). She also has Tricare for life as a mil. retiree where I pay for my own health ins. every month.
Sorry, it doesn’t seem like she can manage $$ properly to me. Everybody’s got the same problem. We’re all among the “landed poor.” Especially those who are trying to live on one income.
I’m highly familiar with Oak Park/Chollas Creek area. Used to own a duplex not far from there. IMO, it’s insane to borrow that much in that area. She took at least $212,500 cash out of that property in just over four years. Makes me wonder . . . what did she do with this $$??
Sorry if I sound judgmental. I could compare myself to Jackson as a single woman except for the fact that she’s far more highly educated than I. Doesn’t make sense to me why she’d do such a thing . . .
Guess I’m the “chump” here, as others have posted on another thread . . . and all I have to show for my “soul-crushing methodical money mgmt.” is my 804 FICO score . . . as a “consolation prize!” What am I going to do with it?? I probably can’t qualify for a home loan under the *NEW* criteria unless I put at least 50% down.
I just have a REAL PROBLEM feeling sorry for someone like that.
June 3, 2010 at 11:21 PM #559416bearishgurlParticipantExcerpts from the VOSD article:
“Jackson purchased the property for $255,000 in July 2002. She then refinanced the property four times over the next four years, the last for $467,500 in November 2006.
Jackson said she “did not have the finances to keep the property” after the state cut funding for her teaching and administrative position with a math program. She said she couldn’t find another local job to supplement her district stipend (the school board is a part-time job that pays $1,500 a month) and Navy pension.”
**************************************************
I don’t know what Jackson’s orig. loan amount was but mine was $244,300 (close to the amt. of her purchase price), which was $91,800 LESS than what I pd. for my property for in 2001. I don’t have a $3,300 – $3,800 mo. pension (Jackson was a Naval Officer) + a $1,500 School Board stipend for a total income of $4,800 – $5,300 month. My mo. income is $1,200 to $1,700 mo. LESS THAN HERS, yet I have managed to “hang-on” without turning my house into an ATM machine (still have orig. “purchase $$ loan” and no others). She also has Tricare for life as a mil. retiree where I pay for my own health ins. every month.
Sorry, it doesn’t seem like she can manage $$ properly to me. Everybody’s got the same problem. We’re all among the “landed poor.” Especially those who are trying to live on one income.
I’m highly familiar with Oak Park/Chollas Creek area. Used to own a duplex not far from there. IMO, it’s insane to borrow that much in that area. She took at least $212,500 cash out of that property in just over four years. Makes me wonder . . . what did she do with this $$??
Sorry if I sound judgmental. I could compare myself to Jackson as a single woman except for the fact that she’s far more highly educated than I. Doesn’t make sense to me why she’d do such a thing . . .
Guess I’m the “chump” here, as others have posted on another thread . . . and all I have to show for my “soul-crushing methodical money mgmt.” is my 804 FICO score . . . as a “consolation prize!” What am I going to do with it?? I probably can’t qualify for a home loan under the *NEW* criteria unless I put at least 50% down.
I just have a REAL PROBLEM feeling sorry for someone like that.
June 3, 2010 at 11:21 PM #559518bearishgurlParticipantExcerpts from the VOSD article:
“Jackson purchased the property for $255,000 in July 2002. She then refinanced the property four times over the next four years, the last for $467,500 in November 2006.
Jackson said she “did not have the finances to keep the property” after the state cut funding for her teaching and administrative position with a math program. She said she couldn’t find another local job to supplement her district stipend (the school board is a part-time job that pays $1,500 a month) and Navy pension.”
**************************************************
I don’t know what Jackson’s orig. loan amount was but mine was $244,300 (close to the amt. of her purchase price), which was $91,800 LESS than what I pd. for my property for in 2001. I don’t have a $3,300 – $3,800 mo. pension (Jackson was a Naval Officer) + a $1,500 School Board stipend for a total income of $4,800 – $5,300 month. My mo. income is $1,200 to $1,700 mo. LESS THAN HERS, yet I have managed to “hang-on” without turning my house into an ATM machine (still have orig. “purchase $$ loan” and no others). She also has Tricare for life as a mil. retiree where I pay for my own health ins. every month.
Sorry, it doesn’t seem like she can manage $$ properly to me. Everybody’s got the same problem. We’re all among the “landed poor.” Especially those who are trying to live on one income.
I’m highly familiar with Oak Park/Chollas Creek area. Used to own a duplex not far from there. IMO, it’s insane to borrow that much in that area. She took at least $212,500 cash out of that property in just over four years. Makes me wonder . . . what did she do with this $$??
Sorry if I sound judgmental. I could compare myself to Jackson as a single woman except for the fact that she’s far more highly educated than I. Doesn’t make sense to me why she’d do such a thing . . .
Guess I’m the “chump” here, as others have posted on another thread . . . and all I have to show for my “soul-crushing methodical money mgmt.” is my 804 FICO score . . . as a “consolation prize!” What am I going to do with it?? I probably can’t qualify for a home loan under the *NEW* criteria unless I put at least 50% down.
I just have a REAL PROBLEM feeling sorry for someone like that.
June 3, 2010 at 11:21 PM #560117bearishgurlParticipantExcerpts from the VOSD article:
“Jackson purchased the property for $255,000 in July 2002. She then refinanced the property four times over the next four years, the last for $467,500 in November 2006.
Jackson said she “did not have the finances to keep the property” after the state cut funding for her teaching and administrative position with a math program. She said she couldn’t find another local job to supplement her district stipend (the school board is a part-time job that pays $1,500 a month) and Navy pension.”
**************************************************
I don’t know what Jackson’s orig. loan amount was but mine was $244,300 (close to the amt. of her purchase price), which was $91,800 LESS than what I pd. for my property for in 2001. I don’t have a $3,300 – $3,800 mo. pension (Jackson was a Naval Officer) + a $1,500 School Board stipend for a total income of $4,800 – $5,300 month. My mo. income is $1,200 to $1,700 mo. LESS THAN HERS, yet I have managed to “hang-on” without turning my house into an ATM machine (still have orig. “purchase $$ loan” and no others). She also has Tricare for life as a mil. retiree where I pay for my own health ins. every month.
Sorry, it doesn’t seem like she can manage $$ properly to me. Everybody’s got the same problem. We’re all among the “landed poor.” Especially those who are trying to live on one income.
I’m highly familiar with Oak Park/Chollas Creek area. Used to own a duplex not far from there. IMO, it’s insane to borrow that much in that area. She took at least $212,500 cash out of that property in just over four years. Makes me wonder . . . what did she do with this $$??
Sorry if I sound judgmental. I could compare myself to Jackson as a single woman except for the fact that she’s far more highly educated than I. Doesn’t make sense to me why she’d do such a thing . . .
Guess I’m the “chump” here, as others have posted on another thread . . . and all I have to show for my “soul-crushing methodical money mgmt.” is my 804 FICO score . . . as a “consolation prize!” What am I going to do with it?? I probably can’t qualify for a home loan under the *NEW* criteria unless I put at least 50% down.
I just have a REAL PROBLEM feeling sorry for someone like that.
June 3, 2010 at 11:21 PM #560014bearishgurlParticipantExcerpts from the VOSD article:
“Jackson purchased the property for $255,000 in July 2002. She then refinanced the property four times over the next four years, the last for $467,500 in November 2006.
Jackson said she “did not have the finances to keep the property” after the state cut funding for her teaching and administrative position with a math program. She said she couldn’t find another local job to supplement her district stipend (the school board is a part-time job that pays $1,500 a month) and Navy pension.”
**************************************************
I don’t know what Jackson’s orig. loan amount was but mine was $244,300 (close to the amt. of her purchase price), which was $91,800 LESS than what I pd. for my property for in 2001. I don’t have a $3,300 – $3,800 mo. pension (Jackson was a Naval Officer) + a $1,500 School Board stipend for a total income of $4,800 – $5,300 month. My mo. income is $1,200 to $1,700 mo. LESS THAN HERS, yet I have managed to “hang-on” without turning my house into an ATM machine (still have orig. “purchase $$ loan” and no others). She also has Tricare for life as a mil. retiree where I pay for my own health ins. every month.
Sorry, it doesn’t seem like she can manage $$ properly to me. Everybody’s got the same problem. We’re all among the “landed poor.” Especially those who are trying to live on one income.
I’m highly familiar with Oak Park/Chollas Creek area. Used to own a duplex not far from there. IMO, it’s insane to borrow that much in that area. She took at least $212,500 cash out of that property in just over four years. Makes me wonder . . . what did she do with this $$??
Sorry if I sound judgmental. I could compare myself to Jackson as a single woman except for the fact that she’s far more highly educated than I. Doesn’t make sense to me why she’d do such a thing . . .
Guess I’m the “chump” here, as others have posted on another thread . . . and all I have to show for my “soul-crushing methodical money mgmt.” is my 804 FICO score . . . as a “consolation prize!” What am I going to do with it?? I probably can’t qualify for a home loan under the *NEW* criteria unless I put at least 50% down.
I just have a REAL PROBLEM feeling sorry for someone like that.
June 4, 2010 at 6:40 AM #560437jpinpbParticipant“There are several people in this economic climate who have gone through that process,” she said. “If no one who went through that process was qualified, then a lot of people couldn’t run.”
bearishgurl – you run. I’ll vote for you!!!
Any other Pigg who isn’t scamming = honest. Start running for office. I’ll vote for you!
She makes it sound like everybody is doing it. This can be a great campaign slogan for people who aren’t defaulting/foreclosing. “I’m not cheating the system. I’m REALLY honest.”
June 4, 2010 at 6:40 AM #559456jpinpbParticipant“There are several people in this economic climate who have gone through that process,” she said. “If no one who went through that process was qualified, then a lot of people couldn’t run.”
bearishgurl – you run. I’ll vote for you!!!
Any other Pigg who isn’t scamming = honest. Start running for office. I’ll vote for you!
She makes it sound like everybody is doing it. This can be a great campaign slogan for people who aren’t defaulting/foreclosing. “I’m not cheating the system. I’m REALLY honest.”
June 4, 2010 at 6:40 AM #559558jpinpbParticipant“There are several people in this economic climate who have gone through that process,” she said. “If no one who went through that process was qualified, then a lot of people couldn’t run.”
bearishgurl – you run. I’ll vote for you!!!
Any other Pigg who isn’t scamming = honest. Start running for office. I’ll vote for you!
She makes it sound like everybody is doing it. This can be a great campaign slogan for people who aren’t defaulting/foreclosing. “I’m not cheating the system. I’m REALLY honest.”
June 4, 2010 at 6:40 AM #560157jpinpbParticipant“There are several people in this economic climate who have gone through that process,” she said. “If no one who went through that process was qualified, then a lot of people couldn’t run.”
bearishgurl – you run. I’ll vote for you!!!
Any other Pigg who isn’t scamming = honest. Start running for office. I’ll vote for you!
She makes it sound like everybody is doing it. This can be a great campaign slogan for people who aren’t defaulting/foreclosing. “I’m not cheating the system. I’m REALLY honest.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.