Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Plunge Protection Team Question
- This topic has 25 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by Deal Hunter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 17, 2008 at 1:17 PM #171767March 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM #171822AnonymousGuest
This is most certainly a government bailout, just not for shareholders. Everybody holding BSC debt got their butts saved big time by Uncle Sam. But the bigger question is how long can the PPT keep plugging holes in the dam?
March 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM #172155AnonymousGuestThis is most certainly a government bailout, just not for shareholders. Everybody holding BSC debt got their butts saved big time by Uncle Sam. But the bigger question is how long can the PPT keep plugging holes in the dam?
March 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM #172160AnonymousGuestThis is most certainly a government bailout, just not for shareholders. Everybody holding BSC debt got their butts saved big time by Uncle Sam. But the bigger question is how long can the PPT keep plugging holes in the dam?
March 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM #172260AnonymousGuestThis is most certainly a government bailout, just not for shareholders. Everybody holding BSC debt got their butts saved big time by Uncle Sam. But the bigger question is how long can the PPT keep plugging holes in the dam?
March 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM #172181AnonymousGuestThis is most certainly a government bailout, just not for shareholders. Everybody holding BSC debt got their butts saved big time by Uncle Sam. But the bigger question is how long can the PPT keep plugging holes in the dam?
March 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #172275Deal HunterParticipant"1) Has the PPT team actually engaged in buying or selling in the markets in recent times? (Or ever)?"
The last "verified" intervention by the PPT was in 1998 with the bail out of LTCM (Long Term Capital Managment).
I think that since that time they have gone beyond black ops and have not outwardly made rescues or even publicly acknowledged any conversations with the markets directly. The most recent meeting (Monday morning) was acknowledged by Secretary Paulson as simply and "updating" of the President to bring him up to speed on what occured over the weekend with Bear Stearns.
I don't think they have any obligation to the public to report their movements, but since the team is made up of government officials and central bankers, it's pretty obvious that they are a powerful force in the markets.
March 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #172195Deal HunterParticipant"1) Has the PPT team actually engaged in buying or selling in the markets in recent times? (Or ever)?"
The last "verified" intervention by the PPT was in 1998 with the bail out of LTCM (Long Term Capital Managment).
I think that since that time they have gone beyond black ops and have not outwardly made rescues or even publicly acknowledged any conversations with the markets directly. The most recent meeting (Monday morning) was acknowledged by Secretary Paulson as simply and "updating" of the President to bring him up to speed on what occured over the weekend with Bear Stearns.
I don't think they have any obligation to the public to report their movements, but since the team is made up of government officials and central bankers, it's pretty obvious that they are a powerful force in the markets.
March 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #172176Deal HunterParticipant"1) Has the PPT team actually engaged in buying or selling in the markets in recent times? (Or ever)?"
The last "verified" intervention by the PPT was in 1998 with the bail out of LTCM (Long Term Capital Managment).
I think that since that time they have gone beyond black ops and have not outwardly made rescues or even publicly acknowledged any conversations with the markets directly. The most recent meeting (Monday morning) was acknowledged by Secretary Paulson as simply and "updating" of the President to bring him up to speed on what occured over the weekend with Bear Stearns.
I don't think they have any obligation to the public to report their movements, but since the team is made up of government officials and central bankers, it's pretty obvious that they are a powerful force in the markets.
March 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #172170Deal HunterParticipant"1) Has the PPT team actually engaged in buying or selling in the markets in recent times? (Or ever)?"
The last "verified" intervention by the PPT was in 1998 with the bail out of LTCM (Long Term Capital Managment).
I think that since that time they have gone beyond black ops and have not outwardly made rescues or even publicly acknowledged any conversations with the markets directly. The most recent meeting (Monday morning) was acknowledged by Secretary Paulson as simply and "updating" of the President to bring him up to speed on what occured over the weekend with Bear Stearns.
I don't think they have any obligation to the public to report their movements, but since the team is made up of government officials and central bankers, it's pretty obvious that they are a powerful force in the markets.
March 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #171837Deal HunterParticipant"1) Has the PPT team actually engaged in buying or selling in the markets in recent times? (Or ever)?"
The last "verified" intervention by the PPT was in 1998 with the bail out of LTCM (Long Term Capital Managment).
I think that since that time they have gone beyond black ops and have not outwardly made rescues or even publicly acknowledged any conversations with the markets directly. The most recent meeting (Monday morning) was acknowledged by Secretary Paulson as simply and "updating" of the President to bring him up to speed on what occured over the weekend with Bear Stearns.
I don't think they have any obligation to the public to report their movements, but since the team is made up of government officials and central bankers, it's pretty obvious that they are a powerful force in the markets.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.