- This topic has 35 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 4, 2008 at 10:34 PM #252696August 5, 2008 at 8:37 AM #252879(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
Typically 75% of the rental income counts towards your income. 100% of the PITI payments count towards debt, when computing debt ratios.
Also, for conforming there is now a rule that you need to have 30% equity in your existing property (be it a rental or primary residence) before yuo can qualify for the next property.Again, these are conforming rules. If you are getting a non-conforming loan some, none or all these may still apply.
August 5, 2008 at 8:37 AM #252875(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantTypically 75% of the rental income counts towards your income. 100% of the PITI payments count towards debt, when computing debt ratios.
Also, for conforming there is now a rule that you need to have 30% equity in your existing property (be it a rental or primary residence) before yuo can qualify for the next property.Again, these are conforming rules. If you are getting a non-conforming loan some, none or all these may still apply.
August 5, 2008 at 8:37 AM #252817(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantTypically 75% of the rental income counts towards your income. 100% of the PITI payments count towards debt, when computing debt ratios.
Also, for conforming there is now a rule that you need to have 30% equity in your existing property (be it a rental or primary residence) before yuo can qualify for the next property.Again, these are conforming rules. If you are getting a non-conforming loan some, none or all these may still apply.
August 5, 2008 at 8:37 AM #252808(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantTypically 75% of the rental income counts towards your income. 100% of the PITI payments count towards debt, when computing debt ratios.
Also, for conforming there is now a rule that you need to have 30% equity in your existing property (be it a rental or primary residence) before yuo can qualify for the next property.Again, these are conforming rules. If you are getting a non-conforming loan some, none or all these may still apply.
August 5, 2008 at 8:37 AM #252641(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantTypically 75% of the rental income counts towards your income. 100% of the PITI payments count towards debt, when computing debt ratios.
Also, for conforming there is now a rule that you need to have 30% equity in your existing property (be it a rental or primary residence) before yuo can qualify for the next property.Again, these are conforming rules. If you are getting a non-conforming loan some, none or all these may still apply.
August 5, 2008 at 3:13 PM #252836crParticipantIsn’t part of the new legislation that rental income can no longer be used as income to qualify for a loan.
In other words, you have to basically qualify for both loans you’re carrying w/o counting rental income…or was I misinformed?
August 5, 2008 at 3:13 PM #253002crParticipantIsn’t part of the new legislation that rental income can no longer be used as income to qualify for a loan.
In other words, you have to basically qualify for both loans you’re carrying w/o counting rental income…or was I misinformed?
August 5, 2008 at 3:13 PM #253011crParticipantIsn’t part of the new legislation that rental income can no longer be used as income to qualify for a loan.
In other words, you have to basically qualify for both loans you’re carrying w/o counting rental income…or was I misinformed?
August 5, 2008 at 3:13 PM #253069crParticipantIsn’t part of the new legislation that rental income can no longer be used as income to qualify for a loan.
In other words, you have to basically qualify for both loans you’re carrying w/o counting rental income…or was I misinformed?
August 5, 2008 at 3:13 PM #253073crParticipantIsn’t part of the new legislation that rental income can no longer be used as income to qualify for a loan.
In other words, you have to basically qualify for both loans you’re carrying w/o counting rental income…or was I misinformed?
August 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #252851RenParticipantThat wouldn’t make sense, because then no one could own more than a few rental properties without a massive income, or without being wealthy already and paying cash for them all. And leveraging is kind of the point – 20% down on multiple properties will get you a lot better return than paying cash for one.
August 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #253088RenParticipantThat wouldn’t make sense, because then no one could own more than a few rental properties without a massive income, or without being wealthy already and paying cash for them all. And leveraging is kind of the point – 20% down on multiple properties will get you a lot better return than paying cash for one.
August 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #253084RenParticipantThat wouldn’t make sense, because then no one could own more than a few rental properties without a massive income, or without being wealthy already and paying cash for them all. And leveraging is kind of the point – 20% down on multiple properties will get you a lot better return than paying cash for one.
August 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #253026RenParticipantThat wouldn’t make sense, because then no one could own more than a few rental properties without a massive income, or without being wealthy already and paying cash for them all. And leveraging is kind of the point – 20% down on multiple properties will get you a lot better return than paying cash for one.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.