- This topic has 455 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by
njtosd.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 10, 2011 at 10:16 AM #665399February 10, 2011 at 10:49 AM #664289
PCinSD
Guest[quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.
February 10, 2011 at 10:49 AM #664351Guest[quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.
February 10, 2011 at 10:49 AM #664955Guest[quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.
February 10, 2011 at 10:49 AM #665093Guest[quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.
February 10, 2011 at 10:49 AM #665429Guest[quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.
February 10, 2011 at 11:00 AM #664294
CoronitaParticipant[quote=pabloesqobar][quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.[/quote]
That’s easy… Just redefine what sex really is…Just what clinton did.
February 10, 2011 at 11:00 AM #664356CoronitaParticipant[quote=pabloesqobar][quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.[/quote]
That’s easy… Just redefine what sex really is…Just what clinton did.
February 10, 2011 at 11:00 AM #664960CoronitaParticipant[quote=pabloesqobar][quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.[/quote]
That’s easy… Just redefine what sex really is…Just what clinton did.
February 10, 2011 at 11:00 AM #665098CoronitaParticipant[quote=pabloesqobar][quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.[/quote]
That’s easy… Just redefine what sex really is…Just what clinton did.
February 10, 2011 at 11:00 AM #665434CoronitaParticipant[quote=pabloesqobar][quote=briansd1][quote=pabloesqobar]
Nice, way to keep thumping the conversatives vs. progressives mantra. Big surprise.[/quote]The point is that:
whereas liberals are permissive and forgiving of people’s weakenesses,
whereas conservatives are cut and dry about sins and morals,
it’s hyprocritical to preach something and do the exact opposite.
Christopher Lee was preaching consersatives moral ideals; and it’s plain obvious that he was trolling for sex with women (and maybe men) on Craiglist.
It’s likely he resigned abruptly because other chat/sex partners could come forward.
PS: Sex is not a sin in my book. Don’t call it a sin and then do it.[/quote]
Just because you think it and then type it here, does not make it true. The point is that men are flawed, particularly politicians. It doesn’t matter what party they are from. I’m sure you would agree that historically there is not much difference in the number of sex or harassment scandals from either side. The article you cited points out that a Democrat recently was forced to step down – but you failed to mention that.
Point to any article, anywhere, that would lead you to suggest that Lee may have been trolling craigslist for men. It’s not out there. You just suggest it to be a dick. No one ever said sex is a sin, but you put that out there like they have. However, many politicians on either side would agree that adultery is a sin. See the difference?
How about providing us with a list of all of the Democrats and Progressives that campaigned on an agenda of “Down with Traditional Family Morals”. “Elect me and I will openly cheat on my spouse because there’s nothing wrong with it”. “I am different than my conservative counterpart because I value infidelity and dishonesty”.
Your main reason on this blog is to mischaracterize conservatives, and then demonize them. That’s not the point of this site, despite your insistence on letting Rich know that his site and his rules can fuck off. You have your own real estate blog where you can do it all you like.
I’ll be waiting for that list of Democrat and Progressive politicians.[/quote]
That’s easy… Just redefine what sex really is…Just what clinton did.
February 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM #664299bearishgurl
Participant[quote=Djshakes] . . . You see, I guarantee Brian is a small unattractive waif of a man who barely holds any manly qualities which are desired by a woman deep down. He is probably a push over and it doesn’t take long for women to lose respect for him. They then cheat. In order to cope with their actions he justifies it by taking on a free love mantra. Picture the 45 year old, 120 lb guy wearing a beret and John Lennon type glasses with a pony tail driving a Prius 15 miles under the speed limit and you have Brian. Now tell me women are falling all over themselves to jump on that train. In order to deal with his shortcomings he has to alter reality to conform with his situation. I guess we all are the center of our own universe…so I can’t blame him completely.[/quote]
Djshakes, you do realize you’re “stereotyping” here, don’t you? While you’re at it, what do you “guarantee” I look like and drive and … how do you perceive my “love life” to be??
Just curious …. ;=)
February 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM #664361Participant[quote=Djshakes] . . . You see, I guarantee Brian is a small unattractive waif of a man who barely holds any manly qualities which are desired by a woman deep down. He is probably a push over and it doesn’t take long for women to lose respect for him. They then cheat. In order to cope with their actions he justifies it by taking on a free love mantra. Picture the 45 year old, 120 lb guy wearing a beret and John Lennon type glasses with a pony tail driving a Prius 15 miles under the speed limit and you have Brian. Now tell me women are falling all over themselves to jump on that train. In order to deal with his shortcomings he has to alter reality to conform with his situation. I guess we all are the center of our own universe…so I can’t blame him completely.[/quote]
Djshakes, you do realize you’re “stereotyping” here, don’t you? While you’re at it, what do you “guarantee” I look like and drive and … how do you perceive my “love life” to be??
Just curious …. ;=)
February 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM #664965Participant[quote=Djshakes] . . . You see, I guarantee Brian is a small unattractive waif of a man who barely holds any manly qualities which are desired by a woman deep down. He is probably a push over and it doesn’t take long for women to lose respect for him. They then cheat. In order to cope with their actions he justifies it by taking on a free love mantra. Picture the 45 year old, 120 lb guy wearing a beret and John Lennon type glasses with a pony tail driving a Prius 15 miles under the speed limit and you have Brian. Now tell me women are falling all over themselves to jump on that train. In order to deal with his shortcomings he has to alter reality to conform with his situation. I guess we all are the center of our own universe…so I can’t blame him completely.[/quote]
Djshakes, you do realize you’re “stereotyping” here, don’t you? While you’re at it, what do you “guarantee” I look like and drive and … how do you perceive my “love life” to be??
Just curious …. ;=)
February 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM #665103Participant[quote=Djshakes] . . . You see, I guarantee Brian is a small unattractive waif of a man who barely holds any manly qualities which are desired by a woman deep down. He is probably a push over and it doesn’t take long for women to lose respect for him. They then cheat. In order to cope with their actions he justifies it by taking on a free love mantra. Picture the 45 year old, 120 lb guy wearing a beret and John Lennon type glasses with a pony tail driving a Prius 15 miles under the speed limit and you have Brian. Now tell me women are falling all over themselves to jump on that train. In order to deal with his shortcomings he has to alter reality to conform with his situation. I guess we all are the center of our own universe…so I can’t blame him completely.[/quote]
Djshakes, you do realize you’re “stereotyping” here, don’t you? While you’re at it, what do you “guarantee” I look like and drive and … how do you perceive my “love life” to be??
Just curious …. ;=)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.