- This topic has 90 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 5, 2009 at 8:45 AM #478124November 5, 2009 at 8:49 AM #478577Mark HolmesParticipant
“My deductible went up from $500 to $2000. And they increased the amount taken out of every paycheck from $150 to $260.”
My changes are similar. This is why so many people, myself included, are screaming for a public option. I personally wish they would just open up Medicare to everyone, with premiums based on income, letting government subsidize costs. This would bring down premiums for private health care quickly.
But at this rate, I’ll be dropping my health care before long. It just isn’t affordable or sensible. The most I’ve ever seen the doctor for is a bi-annual checkup and heartburn. Told me to take Prilosec OTC.
It worked, by the way.
November 5, 2009 at 8:49 AM #478498Mark HolmesParticipant“My deductible went up from $500 to $2000. And they increased the amount taken out of every paycheck from $150 to $260.”
My changes are similar. This is why so many people, myself included, are screaming for a public option. I personally wish they would just open up Medicare to everyone, with premiums based on income, letting government subsidize costs. This would bring down premiums for private health care quickly.
But at this rate, I’ll be dropping my health care before long. It just isn’t affordable or sensible. The most I’ve ever seen the doctor for is a bi-annual checkup and heartburn. Told me to take Prilosec OTC.
It worked, by the way.
November 5, 2009 at 8:49 AM #477959Mark HolmesParticipant“My deductible went up from $500 to $2000. And they increased the amount taken out of every paycheck from $150 to $260.”
My changes are similar. This is why so many people, myself included, are screaming for a public option. I personally wish they would just open up Medicare to everyone, with premiums based on income, letting government subsidize costs. This would bring down premiums for private health care quickly.
But at this rate, I’ll be dropping my health care before long. It just isn’t affordable or sensible. The most I’ve ever seen the doctor for is a bi-annual checkup and heartburn. Told me to take Prilosec OTC.
It worked, by the way.
November 5, 2009 at 8:49 AM #478797Mark HolmesParticipant“My deductible went up from $500 to $2000. And they increased the amount taken out of every paycheck from $150 to $260.”
My changes are similar. This is why so many people, myself included, are screaming for a public option. I personally wish they would just open up Medicare to everyone, with premiums based on income, letting government subsidize costs. This would bring down premiums for private health care quickly.
But at this rate, I’ll be dropping my health care before long. It just isn’t affordable or sensible. The most I’ve ever seen the doctor for is a bi-annual checkup and heartburn. Told me to take Prilosec OTC.
It worked, by the way.
November 5, 2009 at 8:49 AM #478129Mark HolmesParticipant“My deductible went up from $500 to $2000. And they increased the amount taken out of every paycheck from $150 to $260.”
My changes are similar. This is why so many people, myself included, are screaming for a public option. I personally wish they would just open up Medicare to everyone, with premiums based on income, letting government subsidize costs. This would bring down premiums for private health care quickly.
But at this rate, I’ll be dropping my health care before long. It just isn’t affordable or sensible. The most I’ve ever seen the doctor for is a bi-annual checkup and heartburn. Told me to take Prilosec OTC.
It worked, by the way.
November 5, 2009 at 9:20 AM #478164DWCAPParticipantMy vision plan changed, we now can have frames only every 24 months instead of every 12. We can still get new lenses every 12 months, but will have to keep the frames.
BTW I dont wear glasses/contacts.
(moral of the story is not every employer is trying to stickit to the employee)
November 5, 2009 at 9:20 AM #478833DWCAPParticipantMy vision plan changed, we now can have frames only every 24 months instead of every 12. We can still get new lenses every 12 months, but will have to keep the frames.
BTW I dont wear glasses/contacts.
(moral of the story is not every employer is trying to stickit to the employee)
November 5, 2009 at 9:20 AM #478610DWCAPParticipantMy vision plan changed, we now can have frames only every 24 months instead of every 12. We can still get new lenses every 12 months, but will have to keep the frames.
BTW I dont wear glasses/contacts.
(moral of the story is not every employer is trying to stickit to the employee)
November 5, 2009 at 9:20 AM #478532DWCAPParticipantMy vision plan changed, we now can have frames only every 24 months instead of every 12. We can still get new lenses every 12 months, but will have to keep the frames.
BTW I dont wear glasses/contacts.
(moral of the story is not every employer is trying to stickit to the employee)
November 5, 2009 at 9:20 AM #477994DWCAPParticipantMy vision plan changed, we now can have frames only every 24 months instead of every 12. We can still get new lenses every 12 months, but will have to keep the frames.
BTW I dont wear glasses/contacts.
(moral of the story is not every employer is trying to stickit to the employee)
November 5, 2009 at 11:58 AM #478683AecetiaParticipantBrian,
Good thoughts, but even under Pelosi’s behemoth bill for corporate insurance lobbyists, not all will be insured. The whole matter is a boondoggle and needs to be scrapped. The Republicans supposedly have a proposal that would save money. The CBO says the R. plan would lower health care costs ($61 billion over 10 years). Mixed reviews on how many would be uninsured. Since many are uninsured by choice, (the young and the well) this number should not be a make or break. Put catastrophic coverage in for those people. Why can’t they combine the two and come up with a win win for all?November 5, 2009 at 11:58 AM #478604AecetiaParticipantBrian,
Good thoughts, but even under Pelosi’s behemoth bill for corporate insurance lobbyists, not all will be insured. The whole matter is a boondoggle and needs to be scrapped. The Republicans supposedly have a proposal that would save money. The CBO says the R. plan would lower health care costs ($61 billion over 10 years). Mixed reviews on how many would be uninsured. Since many are uninsured by choice, (the young and the well) this number should not be a make or break. Put catastrophic coverage in for those people. Why can’t they combine the two and come up with a win win for all?November 5, 2009 at 11:58 AM #478068AecetiaParticipantBrian,
Good thoughts, but even under Pelosi’s behemoth bill for corporate insurance lobbyists, not all will be insured. The whole matter is a boondoggle and needs to be scrapped. The Republicans supposedly have a proposal that would save money. The CBO says the R. plan would lower health care costs ($61 billion over 10 years). Mixed reviews on how many would be uninsured. Since many are uninsured by choice, (the young and the well) this number should not be a make or break. Put catastrophic coverage in for those people. Why can’t they combine the two and come up with a win win for all?November 5, 2009 at 11:58 AM #478238AecetiaParticipantBrian,
Good thoughts, but even under Pelosi’s behemoth bill for corporate insurance lobbyists, not all will be insured. The whole matter is a boondoggle and needs to be scrapped. The Republicans supposedly have a proposal that would save money. The CBO says the R. plan would lower health care costs ($61 billion over 10 years). Mixed reviews on how many would be uninsured. Since many are uninsured by choice, (the young and the well) this number should not be a make or break. Put catastrophic coverage in for those people. Why can’t they combine the two and come up with a win win for all? -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.