- This topic has 250 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 9, 2010 at 2:16 AM #523957March 9, 2010 at 6:34 AM #523043ocrenterParticipant
[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]cardiac bypass or multiple stent placement.[/quote]
I didn’t know that the emergency room would actually arrange to do all of that to stabilize the patient.
The patient would have to be in bad shape already to need that.[/quote]
The ER would not. But faced with someone who “says” they are actively having chest pain, they will admit. once admitted, a stress test will be done. since the patient really do have cardiac issues, the stress test will of course be positive.
so the doctors now have a patient who continue to report “ongoing pain” along with a positive stress test. they’ll do the angiogram and find the multiple blockage in the coronaries, and guess what, onward to the cardiac bypass the patient was hoping for.
March 9, 2010 at 6:34 AM #523186ocrenterParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]cardiac bypass or multiple stent placement.[/quote]
I didn’t know that the emergency room would actually arrange to do all of that to stabilize the patient.
The patient would have to be in bad shape already to need that.[/quote]
The ER would not. But faced with someone who “says” they are actively having chest pain, they will admit. once admitted, a stress test will be done. since the patient really do have cardiac issues, the stress test will of course be positive.
so the doctors now have a patient who continue to report “ongoing pain” along with a positive stress test. they’ll do the angiogram and find the multiple blockage in the coronaries, and guess what, onward to the cardiac bypass the patient was hoping for.
March 9, 2010 at 6:34 AM #523624ocrenterParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]cardiac bypass or multiple stent placement.[/quote]
I didn’t know that the emergency room would actually arrange to do all of that to stabilize the patient.
The patient would have to be in bad shape already to need that.[/quote]
The ER would not. But faced with someone who “says” they are actively having chest pain, they will admit. once admitted, a stress test will be done. since the patient really do have cardiac issues, the stress test will of course be positive.
so the doctors now have a patient who continue to report “ongoing pain” along with a positive stress test. they’ll do the angiogram and find the multiple blockage in the coronaries, and guess what, onward to the cardiac bypass the patient was hoping for.
March 9, 2010 at 6:34 AM #523719ocrenterParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]cardiac bypass or multiple stent placement.[/quote]
I didn’t know that the emergency room would actually arrange to do all of that to stabilize the patient.
The patient would have to be in bad shape already to need that.[/quote]
The ER would not. But faced with someone who “says” they are actively having chest pain, they will admit. once admitted, a stress test will be done. since the patient really do have cardiac issues, the stress test will of course be positive.
so the doctors now have a patient who continue to report “ongoing pain” along with a positive stress test. they’ll do the angiogram and find the multiple blockage in the coronaries, and guess what, onward to the cardiac bypass the patient was hoping for.
March 9, 2010 at 6:34 AM #523977ocrenterParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]cardiac bypass or multiple stent placement.[/quote]
I didn’t know that the emergency room would actually arrange to do all of that to stabilize the patient.
The patient would have to be in bad shape already to need that.[/quote]
The ER would not. But faced with someone who “says” they are actively having chest pain, they will admit. once admitted, a stress test will be done. since the patient really do have cardiac issues, the stress test will of course be positive.
so the doctors now have a patient who continue to report “ongoing pain” along with a positive stress test. they’ll do the angiogram and find the multiple blockage in the coronaries, and guess what, onward to the cardiac bypass the patient was hoping for.
March 9, 2010 at 6:44 AM #523060ocrenterParticipanta relative showed me a hospital bill from Taiwan recently. he just had ear related surgery, was in the hospital for 3 days. everything added up was $3000. he himself had a $300 co-pay.
US per capita gdp is $45k. Taiwan is $30k.
So adjusted for US per capita GDP, logically, the same surgery and 3 day stay should logically be $4500 here.
but it probably would run $15k to $20k here realistically.
not that I’m for government interference and I am a Republican, but the main difference here is Taiwan has a single payer system.
March 9, 2010 at 6:44 AM #523199ocrenterParticipanta relative showed me a hospital bill from Taiwan recently. he just had ear related surgery, was in the hospital for 3 days. everything added up was $3000. he himself had a $300 co-pay.
US per capita gdp is $45k. Taiwan is $30k.
So adjusted for US per capita GDP, logically, the same surgery and 3 day stay should logically be $4500 here.
but it probably would run $15k to $20k here realistically.
not that I’m for government interference and I am a Republican, but the main difference here is Taiwan has a single payer system.
March 9, 2010 at 6:44 AM #523639ocrenterParticipanta relative showed me a hospital bill from Taiwan recently. he just had ear related surgery, was in the hospital for 3 days. everything added up was $3000. he himself had a $300 co-pay.
US per capita gdp is $45k. Taiwan is $30k.
So adjusted for US per capita GDP, logically, the same surgery and 3 day stay should logically be $4500 here.
but it probably would run $15k to $20k here realistically.
not that I’m for government interference and I am a Republican, but the main difference here is Taiwan has a single payer system.
March 9, 2010 at 6:44 AM #523735ocrenterParticipanta relative showed me a hospital bill from Taiwan recently. he just had ear related surgery, was in the hospital for 3 days. everything added up was $3000. he himself had a $300 co-pay.
US per capita gdp is $45k. Taiwan is $30k.
So adjusted for US per capita GDP, logically, the same surgery and 3 day stay should logically be $4500 here.
but it probably would run $15k to $20k here realistically.
not that I’m for government interference and I am a Republican, but the main difference here is Taiwan has a single payer system.
March 9, 2010 at 6:44 AM #523992ocrenterParticipanta relative showed me a hospital bill from Taiwan recently. he just had ear related surgery, was in the hospital for 3 days. everything added up was $3000. he himself had a $300 co-pay.
US per capita gdp is $45k. Taiwan is $30k.
So adjusted for US per capita GDP, logically, the same surgery and 3 day stay should logically be $4500 here.
but it probably would run $15k to $20k here realistically.
not that I’m for government interference and I am a Republican, but the main difference here is Taiwan has a single payer system.
March 9, 2010 at 7:18 AM #523075danielwisParticipant[quote=ocrenter]a relative showed me a hospital bill from Taiwan recently. he just had ear related surgery, was in the hospital for 3 days. everything added up was $3000. he himself had a $300 co-pay.
US per capita gdp is $45k. Taiwan is $30k.
So adjusted for US per capita GDP, logically, the same surgery and 3 day stay should logically be $4500 here.
but it probably would run $15k to $20k here realistically.
not that I’m for government interference and I am a Republican, but the main difference here is Taiwan has a single payer system.[/quote]
No cognitive dissonance here whatsoever….
March 9, 2010 at 7:18 AM #523215danielwisParticipant[quote=ocrenter]a relative showed me a hospital bill from Taiwan recently. he just had ear related surgery, was in the hospital for 3 days. everything added up was $3000. he himself had a $300 co-pay.
US per capita gdp is $45k. Taiwan is $30k.
So adjusted for US per capita GDP, logically, the same surgery and 3 day stay should logically be $4500 here.
but it probably would run $15k to $20k here realistically.
not that I’m for government interference and I am a Republican, but the main difference here is Taiwan has a single payer system.[/quote]
No cognitive dissonance here whatsoever….
March 9, 2010 at 7:18 AM #523655danielwisParticipant[quote=ocrenter]a relative showed me a hospital bill from Taiwan recently. he just had ear related surgery, was in the hospital for 3 days. everything added up was $3000. he himself had a $300 co-pay.
US per capita gdp is $45k. Taiwan is $30k.
So adjusted for US per capita GDP, logically, the same surgery and 3 day stay should logically be $4500 here.
but it probably would run $15k to $20k here realistically.
not that I’m for government interference and I am a Republican, but the main difference here is Taiwan has a single payer system.[/quote]
No cognitive dissonance here whatsoever….
March 9, 2010 at 7:18 AM #523749danielwisParticipant[quote=ocrenter]a relative showed me a hospital bill from Taiwan recently. he just had ear related surgery, was in the hospital for 3 days. everything added up was $3000. he himself had a $300 co-pay.
US per capita gdp is $45k. Taiwan is $30k.
So adjusted for US per capita GDP, logically, the same surgery and 3 day stay should logically be $4500 here.
but it probably would run $15k to $20k here realistically.
not that I’m for government interference and I am a Republican, but the main difference here is Taiwan has a single payer system.[/quote]
No cognitive dissonance here whatsoever….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.