- This topic has 330 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM #171033March 16, 2008 at 1:26 AM #170603DukehornParticipant
Someone (we know who) is a moron trying to “idealize” Bush’s resume without analyzing a background.
His father was a WWII hero and CIA director. That’s how Bush got a slot in the National Guard as a jet fighter pilot instead of being slotted for Vietnam.
next issue:
Bush got to invest in the Rangers after he lost his dad’s money in the oil fields of Midland because of the Bush name. I lived in Dallas at the time and it was pretty evident that he ran the Rangers into the ground (but made money due to the Ballpark in Arlington)–which was funded before he joined the investment group
next issue:
Harvard. How many Harvard MBAs do you know that get in with C averages? I know quite a few and none of them had gentlemen Cs in undergrad nor are they professed alcoholics. Hint: that’s called a legacy admission.
Bush’s background is a perfect example of the kind of preferential treatment that wealthy donors get in (a) politics, (b) military, (c) academics and (d) government, etc. It’s the American way, I have no complaints. Money greases the wheel.
But it’s LAUGHABLE to attempt to attribute Bush’s career to “talent” when it’s a template for the advantages of wealth.
March 16, 2008 at 1:26 AM #170934DukehornParticipantSomeone (we know who) is a moron trying to “idealize” Bush’s resume without analyzing a background.
His father was a WWII hero and CIA director. That’s how Bush got a slot in the National Guard as a jet fighter pilot instead of being slotted for Vietnam.
next issue:
Bush got to invest in the Rangers after he lost his dad’s money in the oil fields of Midland because of the Bush name. I lived in Dallas at the time and it was pretty evident that he ran the Rangers into the ground (but made money due to the Ballpark in Arlington)–which was funded before he joined the investment group
next issue:
Harvard. How many Harvard MBAs do you know that get in with C averages? I know quite a few and none of them had gentlemen Cs in undergrad nor are they professed alcoholics. Hint: that’s called a legacy admission.
Bush’s background is a perfect example of the kind of preferential treatment that wealthy donors get in (a) politics, (b) military, (c) academics and (d) government, etc. It’s the American way, I have no complaints. Money greases the wheel.
But it’s LAUGHABLE to attempt to attribute Bush’s career to “talent” when it’s a template for the advantages of wealth.
March 16, 2008 at 1:26 AM #170941DukehornParticipantSomeone (we know who) is a moron trying to “idealize” Bush’s resume without analyzing a background.
His father was a WWII hero and CIA director. That’s how Bush got a slot in the National Guard as a jet fighter pilot instead of being slotted for Vietnam.
next issue:
Bush got to invest in the Rangers after he lost his dad’s money in the oil fields of Midland because of the Bush name. I lived in Dallas at the time and it was pretty evident that he ran the Rangers into the ground (but made money due to the Ballpark in Arlington)–which was funded before he joined the investment group
next issue:
Harvard. How many Harvard MBAs do you know that get in with C averages? I know quite a few and none of them had gentlemen Cs in undergrad nor are they professed alcoholics. Hint: that’s called a legacy admission.
Bush’s background is a perfect example of the kind of preferential treatment that wealthy donors get in (a) politics, (b) military, (c) academics and (d) government, etc. It’s the American way, I have no complaints. Money greases the wheel.
But it’s LAUGHABLE to attempt to attribute Bush’s career to “talent” when it’s a template for the advantages of wealth.
March 16, 2008 at 1:26 AM #170961DukehornParticipantSomeone (we know who) is a moron trying to “idealize” Bush’s resume without analyzing a background.
His father was a WWII hero and CIA director. That’s how Bush got a slot in the National Guard as a jet fighter pilot instead of being slotted for Vietnam.
next issue:
Bush got to invest in the Rangers after he lost his dad’s money in the oil fields of Midland because of the Bush name. I lived in Dallas at the time and it was pretty evident that he ran the Rangers into the ground (but made money due to the Ballpark in Arlington)–which was funded before he joined the investment group
next issue:
Harvard. How many Harvard MBAs do you know that get in with C averages? I know quite a few and none of them had gentlemen Cs in undergrad nor are they professed alcoholics. Hint: that’s called a legacy admission.
Bush’s background is a perfect example of the kind of preferential treatment that wealthy donors get in (a) politics, (b) military, (c) academics and (d) government, etc. It’s the American way, I have no complaints. Money greases the wheel.
But it’s LAUGHABLE to attempt to attribute Bush’s career to “talent” when it’s a template for the advantages of wealth.
March 16, 2008 at 1:26 AM #171038DukehornParticipantSomeone (we know who) is a moron trying to “idealize” Bush’s resume without analyzing a background.
His father was a WWII hero and CIA director. That’s how Bush got a slot in the National Guard as a jet fighter pilot instead of being slotted for Vietnam.
next issue:
Bush got to invest in the Rangers after he lost his dad’s money in the oil fields of Midland because of the Bush name. I lived in Dallas at the time and it was pretty evident that he ran the Rangers into the ground (but made money due to the Ballpark in Arlington)–which was funded before he joined the investment group
next issue:
Harvard. How many Harvard MBAs do you know that get in with C averages? I know quite a few and none of them had gentlemen Cs in undergrad nor are they professed alcoholics. Hint: that’s called a legacy admission.
Bush’s background is a perfect example of the kind of preferential treatment that wealthy donors get in (a) politics, (b) military, (c) academics and (d) government, etc. It’s the American way, I have no complaints. Money greases the wheel.
But it’s LAUGHABLE to attempt to attribute Bush’s career to “talent” when it’s a template for the advantages of wealth.
March 16, 2008 at 1:29 AM #170606DukehornParticipantAnd John,
I was an election monitor for the ’04 election in OC. If the illegal vote was such a problem in a Republican stronghold that included Santa Ana, we sure didn’t get any phone calls from the Republican Party asking us to investigate.
March 16, 2008 at 1:29 AM #170939DukehornParticipantAnd John,
I was an election monitor for the ’04 election in OC. If the illegal vote was such a problem in a Republican stronghold that included Santa Ana, we sure didn’t get any phone calls from the Republican Party asking us to investigate.
March 16, 2008 at 1:29 AM #170946DukehornParticipantAnd John,
I was an election monitor for the ’04 election in OC. If the illegal vote was such a problem in a Republican stronghold that included Santa Ana, we sure didn’t get any phone calls from the Republican Party asking us to investigate.
March 16, 2008 at 1:29 AM #170966DukehornParticipantAnd John,
I was an election monitor for the ’04 election in OC. If the illegal vote was such a problem in a Republican stronghold that included Santa Ana, we sure didn’t get any phone calls from the Republican Party asking us to investigate.
March 16, 2008 at 1:29 AM #171043DukehornParticipantAnd John,
I was an election monitor for the ’04 election in OC. If the illegal vote was such a problem in a Republican stronghold that included Santa Ana, we sure didn’t get any phone calls from the Republican Party asking us to investigate.
March 16, 2008 at 3:06 AM #170628ArrayaParticipantAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob.
You see, Democratize is just a nice way of saying ground into oblivion while we take their resources just so we can drive our SUVs just a little bit longer. The invasion of Iraq was part of our energy policy. They really do not care what they think or want and we sure is hell do not want them to have a thriving economy that would suck up our oil that is becoming ever so precious.
We are not leaving Iraq, Democrat or Republican in the White House. Iraq is a big gas station for our military and a permanent base to launch more resource wars when necessary. We are entering a new energy constricted world folks, the rules are changing…
March 16, 2008 at 3:06 AM #170959ArrayaParticipantAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob.
You see, Democratize is just a nice way of saying ground into oblivion while we take their resources just so we can drive our SUVs just a little bit longer. The invasion of Iraq was part of our energy policy. They really do not care what they think or want and we sure is hell do not want them to have a thriving economy that would suck up our oil that is becoming ever so precious.
We are not leaving Iraq, Democrat or Republican in the White House. Iraq is a big gas station for our military and a permanent base to launch more resource wars when necessary. We are entering a new energy constricted world folks, the rules are changing…
March 16, 2008 at 3:06 AM #170965ArrayaParticipantAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob.
You see, Democratize is just a nice way of saying ground into oblivion while we take their resources just so we can drive our SUVs just a little bit longer. The invasion of Iraq was part of our energy policy. They really do not care what they think or want and we sure is hell do not want them to have a thriving economy that would suck up our oil that is becoming ever so precious.
We are not leaving Iraq, Democrat or Republican in the White House. Iraq is a big gas station for our military and a permanent base to launch more resource wars when necessary. We are entering a new energy constricted world folks, the rules are changing…
March 16, 2008 at 3:06 AM #170986ArrayaParticipantAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob.
You see, Democratize is just a nice way of saying ground into oblivion while we take their resources just so we can drive our SUVs just a little bit longer. The invasion of Iraq was part of our energy policy. They really do not care what they think or want and we sure is hell do not want them to have a thriving economy that would suck up our oil that is becoming ever so precious.
We are not leaving Iraq, Democrat or Republican in the White House. Iraq is a big gas station for our military and a permanent base to launch more resource wars when necessary. We are entering a new energy constricted world folks, the rules are changing…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.