- This topic has 160 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 13, 2009 at 8:07 AM #346287February 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM #345737ralphfurleyParticipant
I had no clue what PPT was so I looked it up on wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Group_on_Financial_Markets
Interesting stuff. Doesn’t seem like a stretch by any means. If the government is going to throw tons of money at these financial institutions, why not manipulate the market a little bit to prevent things from melting down?
February 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM #346057ralphfurleyParticipantI had no clue what PPT was so I looked it up on wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Group_on_Financial_Markets
Interesting stuff. Doesn’t seem like a stretch by any means. If the government is going to throw tons of money at these financial institutions, why not manipulate the market a little bit to prevent things from melting down?
February 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM #346164ralphfurleyParticipantI had no clue what PPT was so I looked it up on wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Group_on_Financial_Markets
Interesting stuff. Doesn’t seem like a stretch by any means. If the government is going to throw tons of money at these financial institutions, why not manipulate the market a little bit to prevent things from melting down?
February 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM #346198ralphfurleyParticipantI had no clue what PPT was so I looked it up on wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Group_on_Financial_Markets
Interesting stuff. Doesn’t seem like a stretch by any means. If the government is going to throw tons of money at these financial institutions, why not manipulate the market a little bit to prevent things from melting down?
February 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM #346297ralphfurleyParticipantI had no clue what PPT was so I looked it up on wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Group_on_Financial_Markets
Interesting stuff. Doesn’t seem like a stretch by any means. If the government is going to throw tons of money at these financial institutions, why not manipulate the market a little bit to prevent things from melting down?
February 13, 2009 at 8:29 AM #345747ralphfurleyParticipant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
Much like the crotchety old man who “hates” kids and tells them to get off his lawn, you guys need Breeze around here. What would you do if school was not in session?
That being said, STDs? While having sex with Tommy Lee may be stimulating, it has no place on this bill. Maybe they should throw it in the healthcare bill that Pelosi wants to put together in the next year or two.
February 13, 2009 at 8:29 AM #346067ralphfurleyParticipant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
Much like the crotchety old man who “hates” kids and tells them to get off his lawn, you guys need Breeze around here. What would you do if school was not in session?
That being said, STDs? While having sex with Tommy Lee may be stimulating, it has no place on this bill. Maybe they should throw it in the healthcare bill that Pelosi wants to put together in the next year or two.
February 13, 2009 at 8:29 AM #346174ralphfurleyParticipant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
Much like the crotchety old man who “hates” kids and tells them to get off his lawn, you guys need Breeze around here. What would you do if school was not in session?
That being said, STDs? While having sex with Tommy Lee may be stimulating, it has no place on this bill. Maybe they should throw it in the healthcare bill that Pelosi wants to put together in the next year or two.
February 13, 2009 at 8:29 AM #346208ralphfurleyParticipant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
Much like the crotchety old man who “hates” kids and tells them to get off his lawn, you guys need Breeze around here. What would you do if school was not in session?
That being said, STDs? While having sex with Tommy Lee may be stimulating, it has no place on this bill. Maybe they should throw it in the healthcare bill that Pelosi wants to put together in the next year or two.
February 13, 2009 at 8:29 AM #346307ralphfurleyParticipant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
Much like the crotchety old man who “hates” kids and tells them to get off his lawn, you guys need Breeze around here. What would you do if school was not in session?
That being said, STDs? While having sex with Tommy Lee may be stimulating, it has no place on this bill. Maybe they should throw it in the healthcare bill that Pelosi wants to put together in the next year or two.
February 13, 2009 at 8:46 PM #346160AnonymousGuestYou know, STD cases on the rise and a friend of mine who works for STDslove.com told me that the new subscribers have increased 30% over 2007. Rising STD rate sparks online dating sites.
It time to take some measures to decrease STD rate!February 13, 2009 at 8:46 PM #346481AnonymousGuestYou know, STD cases on the rise and a friend of mine who works for STDslove.com told me that the new subscribers have increased 30% over 2007. Rising STD rate sparks online dating sites.
It time to take some measures to decrease STD rate!February 13, 2009 at 8:46 PM #346590AnonymousGuestYou know, STD cases on the rise and a friend of mine who works for STDslove.com told me that the new subscribers have increased 30% over 2007. Rising STD rate sparks online dating sites.
It time to take some measures to decrease STD rate!February 13, 2009 at 8:46 PM #346624AnonymousGuestYou know, STD cases on the rise and a friend of mine who works for STDslove.com told me that the new subscribers have increased 30% over 2007. Rising STD rate sparks online dating sites.
It time to take some measures to decrease STD rate! -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.