NACA – suggesting lowering rates

[5yearwaiter]

This is another big mistake that ZANDI thinking to do like Greespan did several years back with non stop lowering rates and allowing mortgages free fly. Now with ZANDI’s options several fake forclosures would come and they don’t get clues until next havoc shows after a couple of years. I belive we have several below normal knowledge folks are on our trend setters and it is our fata virtue now a days…

5yearswaiter

[Aecetia]

Here is some more interesting news from the government from Bloomberg.com:
“Bernanke Urges Banks to Forgive Portion of Mortgages (Update3)
By Scott Lanman and Steve Matthews

March 4 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, battling the worst housing recession in a quarter century, urged lenders to forgive portions of mortgages held by homeowners at risk of defaulting.

“Efforts by both government and private-sector entities to reduce unnecessary foreclosures are helping, but more can, and should, be done,” Bernanke said in a speech to bankers in Orlando, Florida, today. “Principal reductions that restore some equity for the homeowner may be a relatively more effective means of avoiding delinquency and foreclosure.”

Bernanke’s call goes beyond the stance of the Bush administration and previous Fed comments. By comparison, the central bank’s Feb. 27 report to Congress called for lenders to “pursue prudent loan workouts” through means such as modifying mortgage terms and deferring payments.

The Fed chief highlighted the threat posed by home values falling below mortgage balances, something Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson played down yesterday. Bernanke said the “recent surge” in delinquencies has been “closely linked” to the slide of home equity.

Paulson said in an interview with Bloomberg Television yesterday that “almost too much” has been made out of concerns about homeowners whose house prices have dropped below their mortgages. He also said the administration’s strategy of encouraging lenders to modify loans is “the right approach and we are making substantial progress.”

Won’t `Dictate’

“We’re not going to dictate” how lenders should alter mortgage contracts, Treasury spokeswoman Brookly Mclaughlin said in an e-mailed response to questions. “If lenders find that in some cases a principal writedown is less costly than foreclosure, then that is an option they have the incentive to consider.”

[Aecetia]

Here is some more interesting news from the government from Bloomberg.com:
“Bernanke Urges Banks to Forgive Portion of Mortgages (Update3)
By Scott Lanman and Steve Matthews

March 4 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, battling the worst housing recession in a quarter century, urged lenders to forgive portions of mortgages held by homeowners at risk of defaulting.

“Efforts by both government and private-sector entities to reduce unnecessary foreclosures are helping, but more can, and should, be done,” Bernanke said in a speech to bankers in Orlando, Florida, today. “Principal reductions that restore some equity for the homeowner may be a relatively more effective means of avoiding delinquency and foreclosure.”

Bernanke’s call goes beyond the stance of the Bush administration and previous Fed comments. By comparison, the central bank’s Feb. 27 report to Congress called for lenders to “pursue prudent loan workouts” through means such as modifying mortgage terms and deferring payments.

The Fed chief highlighted the threat posed by home values falling below mortgage balances, something Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson played down yesterday. Bernanke said the “recent surge” in delinquencies has been “closely linked” to the slide of home equity.

Paulson said in an interview with Bloomberg Television yesterday that “almost too much” has been made out of concerns about homeowners whose house prices have dropped below their mortgages. He also said the administration’s strategy of encouraging lenders to modify loans is “the right approach and we are making substantial progress.”

Won’t `Dictate’

“We’re not going to dictate” how lenders should alter mortgage contracts, Treasury spokeswoman Brookly Mclaughlin said in an e-mailed response to questions. “If lenders find that in some cases a principal writedown is less costly than foreclosure, then that is an option they have the incentive to consider.”

[Aecetia]

Here is some more interesting news from the government from Bloomberg.com:
“Bernanke Urges Banks to Forgive Portion of Mortgages (Update3)
By Scott Lanman and Steve Matthews

March 4 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, battling the worst housing recession in a quarter century, urged lenders to forgive portions of mortgages held by homeowners at risk of defaulting.

“Efforts by both government and private-sector entities to reduce unnecessary foreclosures are helping, but more can, and should, be done,” Bernanke said in a speech to bankers in Orlando, Florida, today. “Principal reductions that restore some equity for the homeowner may be a relatively more effective means of avoiding delinquency and foreclosure.”

Bernanke’s call goes beyond the stance of the Bush administration and previous Fed comments. By comparison, the central bank’s Feb. 27 report to Congress called for lenders to “pursue prudent loan workouts” through means such as modifying mortgage terms and deferring payments.

The Fed chief highlighted the threat posed by home values falling below mortgage balances, something Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson played down yesterday. Bernanke said the “recent surge” in delinquencies has been “closely linked” to the slide of home equity.

Paulson said in an interview with Bloomberg Television yesterday that “almost too much” has been made out of concerns about homeowners whose house prices have dropped below their mortgages. He also said the administration’s strategy of encouraging lenders to modify loans is “the right approach and we are making substantial progress.”

Won’t `Dictate’

“We’re not going to dictate” how lenders should alter mortgage contracts, Treasury spokeswoman Brookly Mclaughlin said in an e-mailed response to questions. “If lenders find that in some cases a principal writedown is less costly than foreclosure, then that is an option they have the incentive to consider.”

[Aecetia]

Here is some more interesting news from the government from Bloomberg.com:
“Bernanke Urges Banks to Forgive Portion of Mortgages (Update3)
By Scott Lanman and Steve Matthews

March 4 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, battling the worst housing recession in a quarter century, urged lenders to forgive portions of mortgages held by homeowners at risk of defaulting.

“Efforts by both government and private-sector entities to reduce unnecessary foreclosures are helping, but more can, and should, be done,” Bernanke said in a speech to bankers in Orlando, Florida, today. “Principal reductions that restore some equity for the homeowner may be a relatively more effective means of avoiding delinquency and foreclosure.”

Bernanke’s call goes beyond the stance of the Bush administration and previous Fed comments. By comparison, the central bank’s Feb. 27 report to Congress called for lenders to “pursue prudent loan workouts” through means such as modifying mortgage terms and deferring payments.

The Fed chief highlighted the threat posed by home values falling below mortgage balances, something Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson played down yesterday. Bernanke said the “recent surge” in delinquencies has been “closely linked” to the slide of home equity.

Paulson said in an interview with Bloomberg Television yesterday that “almost too much” has been made out of concerns about homeowners whose house prices have dropped below their mortgages. He also said the administration’s strategy of encouraging lenders to modify loans is “the right approach and we are making substantial progress.”

Won’t `Dictate’

“We’re not going to dictate” how lenders should alter mortgage contracts, Treasury spokeswoman Brookly Mclaughlin said in an e-mailed response to questions. “If lenders find that in some cases a principal writedown is less costly than foreclosure, then that is an option they have the incentive to consider.”

[Aecetia]

Here is some more interesting news from the government from Bloomberg.com:
“Bernanke Urges Banks to Forgive Portion of Mortgages (Update3)
By Scott Lanman and Steve Matthews

March 4 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, battling the worst housing recession in a quarter century, urged lenders to forgive portions of mortgages held by homeowners at risk of defaulting.

“Efforts by both government and private-sector entities to reduce unnecessary foreclosures are helping, but more can, and should, be done,” Bernanke said in a speech to bankers in Orlando, Florida, today. “Principal reductions that restore some equity for the homeowner may be a relatively more effective means of avoiding delinquency and foreclosure.”

Bernanke’s call goes beyond the stance of the Bush administration and previous Fed comments. By comparison, the central bank’s Feb. 27 report to Congress called for lenders to “pursue prudent loan workouts” through means such as modifying mortgage terms and deferring payments.

The Fed chief highlighted the threat posed by home values falling below mortgage balances, something Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson played down yesterday. Bernanke said the “recent surge” in delinquencies has been “closely linked” to the slide of home equity.

Paulson said in an interview with Bloomberg Television yesterday that “almost too much” has been made out of concerns about homeowners whose house prices have dropped below their mortgages. He also said the administration’s strategy of encouraging lenders to modify loans is “the right approach and we are making substantial progress.”

Won’t `Dictate’

“We’re not going to dictate” how lenders should alter mortgage contracts, Treasury spokeswoman Brookly Mclaughlin said in an e-mailed response to questions. “If lenders find that in some cases a principal writedown is less costly than foreclosure, then that is an option they have the incentive to consider.”

[jpinpb]

I read Bernanke’s entire speech on the forum I posted regarding the warning of foreclosure despite aid.

My questions are more toward what will the government do to remedy the collapse of the housing market to the detriment of taxpayers, how much will it actually help and how soon a recovery.

Seems like they’re all making suggestions, proposals, urges, etc, but we’re still looking at defaults and foreclosures and people not hesitating walking, yet others defiant on reducing prices.

[jpinpb]

I read Bernanke’s entire speech on the forum I posted regarding the warning of foreclosure despite aid.

My questions are more toward what will the government do to remedy the collapse of the housing market to the detriment of taxpayers, how much will it actually help and how soon a recovery.

Seems like they’re all making suggestions, proposals, urges, etc, but we’re still looking at defaults and foreclosures and people not hesitating walking, yet others defiant on reducing prices.

[jpinpb]

I read Bernanke’s entire speech on the forum I posted regarding the warning of foreclosure despite aid.

My questions are more toward what will the government do to remedy the collapse of the housing market to the detriment of taxpayers, how much will it actually help and how soon a recovery.

Seems like they’re all making suggestions, proposals, urges, etc, but we’re still looking at defaults and foreclosures and people not hesitating walking, yet others defiant on reducing prices.

[jpinpb]

I read Bernanke’s entire speech on the forum I posted regarding the warning of foreclosure despite aid.

My questions are more toward what will the government do to remedy the collapse of the housing market to the detriment of taxpayers, how much will it actually help and how soon a recovery.

Seems like they’re all making suggestions, proposals, urges, etc, but we’re still looking at defaults and foreclosures and people not hesitating walking, yet others defiant on reducing prices.

[jpinpb]

I read Bernanke’s entire speech on the forum I posted regarding the warning of foreclosure despite aid.

My questions are more toward what will the government do to remedy the collapse of the housing market to the detriment of taxpayers, how much will it actually help and how soon a recovery.

Seems like they’re all making suggestions, proposals, urges, etc, but we’re still looking at defaults and foreclosures and people not hesitating walking, yet others defiant on reducing prices.

[bsrsharma]

Actually, if the government pays 50% or less of the original value of mortgages, it may not be a big loss eventually, if you compute the systemic costs of alternative scenarios. It may become like Chrysler bailout, only much larger in size. They should reprice the asset to pre-bubble days (1999/2000) and pay about 80% of that.

[bsrsharma]

Actually, if the government pays 50% or less of the original value of mortgages, it may not be a big loss eventually, if you compute the systemic costs of alternative scenarios. It may become like Chrysler bailout, only much larger in size. They should reprice the asset to pre-bubble days (1999/2000) and pay about 80% of that.

[bsrsharma]

Actually, if the government pays 50% or less of the original value of mortgages, it may not be a big loss eventually, if you compute the systemic costs of alternative scenarios. It may become like Chrysler bailout, only much larger in size. They should reprice the asset to pre-bubble days (1999/2000) and pay about 80% of that.

[bsrsharma]

Actually, if the government pays 50% or less of the original value of mortgages, it may not be a big loss eventually, if you compute the systemic costs of alternative scenarios. It may become like Chrysler bailout, only much larger in size. They should reprice the asset to pre-bubble days (1999/2000) and pay about 80% of that.

[Author]

Posts