Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Leverage (still) Pays: An example from a recent bank failure
- This topic has 15 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by TheBreeze.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 11, 2009 at 6:28 PM #15281March 11, 2009 at 6:38 PM #364243patientrenterParticipant
This sort of thing happens a little all the time. What’s different now is that it is approved and supported by the govt, and is happening on a massive scale. I am really beginning to think all this “save the economy” crap is just a cover for massive looting by net borrowers, with pols and professional money men along for the ride.
March 11, 2009 at 6:38 PM #364530patientrenterParticipantThis sort of thing happens a little all the time. What’s different now is that it is approved and supported by the govt, and is happening on a massive scale. I am really beginning to think all this “save the economy” crap is just a cover for massive looting by net borrowers, with pols and professional money men along for the ride.
March 11, 2009 at 6:38 PM #364689patientrenterParticipantThis sort of thing happens a little all the time. What’s different now is that it is approved and supported by the govt, and is happening on a massive scale. I am really beginning to think all this “save the economy” crap is just a cover for massive looting by net borrowers, with pols and professional money men along for the ride.
March 11, 2009 at 6:38 PM #364723patientrenterParticipantThis sort of thing happens a little all the time. What’s different now is that it is approved and supported by the govt, and is happening on a massive scale. I am really beginning to think all this “save the economy” crap is just a cover for massive looting by net borrowers, with pols and professional money men along for the ride.
March 11, 2009 at 6:38 PM #364836patientrenterParticipantThis sort of thing happens a little all the time. What’s different now is that it is approved and supported by the govt, and is happening on a massive scale. I am really beginning to think all this “save the economy” crap is just a cover for massive looting by net borrowers, with pols and professional money men along for the ride.
March 11, 2009 at 7:26 PM #364263daveljParticipantI think there is (obviously) massive looting going on, but I think a lot of it is unintentional. That is, my friend’s brother and his partners didn’t set out to loot. I’m sure they would rather have had things work out as their original plan dictated (rents grow, property values grow, loan gets paid off, etc.). The problem is that the system is full of bad incentives. And people respond to incentives. If you incent folks to lever, they will.
I’m hopeful that in all the coming reform and re-regulation of the financial system that the issue of incentives will be addressed, because that will solve a lot of the underlying problems.
Interestingly, these guys actually got quite lucky. Had they defaulted over a year ago there’s a good chance the bank would have had time to foreclose on the properties and collect what they could on the personal guarantees, thus BK-ing the partners. The same would have happened had they defaulted when they did and had the bank not gone into receivership. Likewise, had they waited until after the bank went into receivership, the vultures would have probably overpaid for the loan (it would still appear to be performing, thus a smaller discount to face value would have been applied) and would have had to squeeze them for more money to get a return. So, really, they got very lucky.
March 11, 2009 at 7:26 PM #364551daveljParticipantI think there is (obviously) massive looting going on, but I think a lot of it is unintentional. That is, my friend’s brother and his partners didn’t set out to loot. I’m sure they would rather have had things work out as their original plan dictated (rents grow, property values grow, loan gets paid off, etc.). The problem is that the system is full of bad incentives. And people respond to incentives. If you incent folks to lever, they will.
I’m hopeful that in all the coming reform and re-regulation of the financial system that the issue of incentives will be addressed, because that will solve a lot of the underlying problems.
Interestingly, these guys actually got quite lucky. Had they defaulted over a year ago there’s a good chance the bank would have had time to foreclose on the properties and collect what they could on the personal guarantees, thus BK-ing the partners. The same would have happened had they defaulted when they did and had the bank not gone into receivership. Likewise, had they waited until after the bank went into receivership, the vultures would have probably overpaid for the loan (it would still appear to be performing, thus a smaller discount to face value would have been applied) and would have had to squeeze them for more money to get a return. So, really, they got very lucky.
March 11, 2009 at 7:26 PM #364709daveljParticipantI think there is (obviously) massive looting going on, but I think a lot of it is unintentional. That is, my friend’s brother and his partners didn’t set out to loot. I’m sure they would rather have had things work out as their original plan dictated (rents grow, property values grow, loan gets paid off, etc.). The problem is that the system is full of bad incentives. And people respond to incentives. If you incent folks to lever, they will.
I’m hopeful that in all the coming reform and re-regulation of the financial system that the issue of incentives will be addressed, because that will solve a lot of the underlying problems.
Interestingly, these guys actually got quite lucky. Had they defaulted over a year ago there’s a good chance the bank would have had time to foreclose on the properties and collect what they could on the personal guarantees, thus BK-ing the partners. The same would have happened had they defaulted when they did and had the bank not gone into receivership. Likewise, had they waited until after the bank went into receivership, the vultures would have probably overpaid for the loan (it would still appear to be performing, thus a smaller discount to face value would have been applied) and would have had to squeeze them for more money to get a return. So, really, they got very lucky.
March 11, 2009 at 7:26 PM #364742daveljParticipantI think there is (obviously) massive looting going on, but I think a lot of it is unintentional. That is, my friend’s brother and his partners didn’t set out to loot. I’m sure they would rather have had things work out as their original plan dictated (rents grow, property values grow, loan gets paid off, etc.). The problem is that the system is full of bad incentives. And people respond to incentives. If you incent folks to lever, they will.
I’m hopeful that in all the coming reform and re-regulation of the financial system that the issue of incentives will be addressed, because that will solve a lot of the underlying problems.
Interestingly, these guys actually got quite lucky. Had they defaulted over a year ago there’s a good chance the bank would have had time to foreclose on the properties and collect what they could on the personal guarantees, thus BK-ing the partners. The same would have happened had they defaulted when they did and had the bank not gone into receivership. Likewise, had they waited until after the bank went into receivership, the vultures would have probably overpaid for the loan (it would still appear to be performing, thus a smaller discount to face value would have been applied) and would have had to squeeze them for more money to get a return. So, really, they got very lucky.
March 11, 2009 at 7:26 PM #364855daveljParticipantI think there is (obviously) massive looting going on, but I think a lot of it is unintentional. That is, my friend’s brother and his partners didn’t set out to loot. I’m sure they would rather have had things work out as their original plan dictated (rents grow, property values grow, loan gets paid off, etc.). The problem is that the system is full of bad incentives. And people respond to incentives. If you incent folks to lever, they will.
I’m hopeful that in all the coming reform and re-regulation of the financial system that the issue of incentives will be addressed, because that will solve a lot of the underlying problems.
Interestingly, these guys actually got quite lucky. Had they defaulted over a year ago there’s a good chance the bank would have had time to foreclose on the properties and collect what they could on the personal guarantees, thus BK-ing the partners. The same would have happened had they defaulted when they did and had the bank not gone into receivership. Likewise, had they waited until after the bank went into receivership, the vultures would have probably overpaid for the loan (it would still appear to be performing, thus a smaller discount to face value would have been applied) and would have had to squeeze them for more money to get a return. So, really, they got very lucky.
March 12, 2009 at 8:10 AM #364504TheBreezeParticipantThis is pretty disgusting all around. What’s most disgusting is that these jokers probably think they’ve ‘earned’ that money, when in reality, all they have done is loot the public coffers.
Yep, this is what passes for ‘capitalism’ in this country. I’m surprised that FLU and AN, the Beavis and Butthead of socio-capitalism, aren’t in this thread defending these douches’ against any and all taxes.
March 12, 2009 at 8:10 AM #364791TheBreezeParticipantThis is pretty disgusting all around. What’s most disgusting is that these jokers probably think they’ve ‘earned’ that money, when in reality, all they have done is loot the public coffers.
Yep, this is what passes for ‘capitalism’ in this country. I’m surprised that FLU and AN, the Beavis and Butthead of socio-capitalism, aren’t in this thread defending these douches’ against any and all taxes.
March 12, 2009 at 8:10 AM #364948TheBreezeParticipantThis is pretty disgusting all around. What’s most disgusting is that these jokers probably think they’ve ‘earned’ that money, when in reality, all they have done is loot the public coffers.
Yep, this is what passes for ‘capitalism’ in this country. I’m surprised that FLU and AN, the Beavis and Butthead of socio-capitalism, aren’t in this thread defending these douches’ against any and all taxes.
March 12, 2009 at 8:10 AM #364984TheBreezeParticipantThis is pretty disgusting all around. What’s most disgusting is that these jokers probably think they’ve ‘earned’ that money, when in reality, all they have done is loot the public coffers.
Yep, this is what passes for ‘capitalism’ in this country. I’m surprised that FLU and AN, the Beavis and Butthead of socio-capitalism, aren’t in this thread defending these douches’ against any and all taxes.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.