jcfuquette must go

[34f3f3f]

I agree that off topic is essential to give people something to talk about when there’s nothing to report in real estate, but this is blatant electioneering, and in my view has no place here. It’s an attempt to use the internet to fight Obama on his home turf. There was a recent post that asked where everybody has gone? This kind of shallow political posturing may be one reason. It certainly has turned me off, and I’ve been spending more time on other blogs. One way to deal with them is just to ignore them completely, and they will pass down the active topics list quickly.

[surveyor]

partisan?

So, qw, the only objection you really have is that ONE topic contains anti-Obama material? Is that supposed to be objective? Because of that, you have problems with it?

I didn’t participate in the other Vote Obama topic and it was generally pro-Obama, but I never heard it generate this amount of complaining.

Honestly, the discussion would have probably gone well if it contained more dissection of the facts as opposed to the rampant name-calling.

Again, you are not forced to read forum topics if you do not want to. Right in the title, it’s already political. I mean, people in other countries DIE for the right for this kind of discussion, and we complain.

[surveyor]

partisan?

So, qw, the only objection you really have is that ONE topic contains anti-Obama material? Is that supposed to be objective? Because of that, you have problems with it?

I didn’t participate in the other Vote Obama topic and it was generally pro-Obama, but I never heard it generate this amount of complaining.

Honestly, the discussion would have probably gone well if it contained more dissection of the facts as opposed to the rampant name-calling.

Again, you are not forced to read forum topics if you do not want to. Right in the title, it’s already political. I mean, people in other countries DIE for the right for this kind of discussion, and we complain.

[surveyor]

partisan?

So, qw, the only objection you really have is that ONE topic contains anti-Obama material? Is that supposed to be objective? Because of that, you have problems with it?

I didn’t participate in the other Vote Obama topic and it was generally pro-Obama, but I never heard it generate this amount of complaining.

Honestly, the discussion would have probably gone well if it contained more dissection of the facts as opposed to the rampant name-calling.

Again, you are not forced to read forum topics if you do not want to. Right in the title, it’s already political. I mean, people in other countries DIE for the right for this kind of discussion, and we complain.

[surveyor]

partisan?

So, qw, the only objection you really have is that ONE topic contains anti-Obama material? Is that supposed to be objective? Because of that, you have problems with it?

I didn’t participate in the other Vote Obama topic and it was generally pro-Obama, but I never heard it generate this amount of complaining.

Honestly, the discussion would have probably gone well if it contained more dissection of the facts as opposed to the rampant name-calling.

Again, you are not forced to read forum topics if you do not want to. Right in the title, it’s already political. I mean, people in other countries DIE for the right for this kind of discussion, and we complain.

[surveyor]

partisan?

So, qw, the only objection you really have is that ONE topic contains anti-Obama material? Is that supposed to be objective? Because of that, you have problems with it?

I didn’t participate in the other Vote Obama topic and it was generally pro-Obama, but I never heard it generate this amount of complaining.

Honestly, the discussion would have probably gone well if it contained more dissection of the facts as opposed to the rampant name-calling.

Again, you are not forced to read forum topics if you do not want to. Right in the title, it’s already political. I mean, people in other countries DIE for the right for this kind of discussion, and we complain.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

surveyor: In fairness, I think denoting the thread with a big “OT” would help also. Yeah, the title should be a dead giveaway, but in case it isn’t…

The word “shallow” in qwerty’s post also caught my eye. With the exception of some ad hominen pisstivity, that thread was one of the best, most entertaining and informative posts that’s been here in a while.

As you pointed out, and much like TV, if you don’t like it, don’t watch. Exercise your right to not participate, but allow the rest of those who want to to do so.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

surveyor: In fairness, I think denoting the thread with a big “OT” would help also. Yeah, the title should be a dead giveaway, but in case it isn’t…

The word “shallow” in qwerty’s post also caught my eye. With the exception of some ad hominen pisstivity, that thread was one of the best, most entertaining and informative posts that’s been here in a while.

As you pointed out, and much like TV, if you don’t like it, don’t watch. Exercise your right to not participate, but allow the rest of those who want to to do so.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

surveyor: In fairness, I think denoting the thread with a big “OT” would help also. Yeah, the title should be a dead giveaway, but in case it isn’t…

The word “shallow” in qwerty’s post also caught my eye. With the exception of some ad hominen pisstivity, that thread was one of the best, most entertaining and informative posts that’s been here in a while.

As you pointed out, and much like TV, if you don’t like it, don’t watch. Exercise your right to not participate, but allow the rest of those who want to to do so.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

surveyor: In fairness, I think denoting the thread with a big “OT” would help also. Yeah, the title should be a dead giveaway, but in case it isn’t…

The word “shallow” in qwerty’s post also caught my eye. With the exception of some ad hominen pisstivity, that thread was one of the best, most entertaining and informative posts that’s been here in a while.

As you pointed out, and much like TV, if you don’t like it, don’t watch. Exercise your right to not participate, but allow the rest of those who want to to do so.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

surveyor: In fairness, I think denoting the thread with a big “OT” would help also. Yeah, the title should be a dead giveaway, but in case it isn’t…

The word “shallow” in qwerty’s post also caught my eye. With the exception of some ad hominen pisstivity, that thread was one of the best, most entertaining and informative posts that’s been here in a while.

As you pointed out, and much like TV, if you don’t like it, don’t watch. Exercise your right to not participate, but allow the rest of those who want to to do so.

[NotCranky]

There was a lot of good vocabulary used on the thread by the same person who brings us pissivity this morning. We found out who all the baby boomers are too.

[NotCranky]

There was a lot of good vocabulary used on the thread by the same person who brings us pissivity this morning. We found out who all the baby boomers are too.

[NotCranky]

There was a lot of good vocabulary used on the thread by the same person who brings us pissivity this morning. We found out who all the baby boomers are too.

[NotCranky]

There was a lot of good vocabulary used on the thread by the same person who brings us pissivity this morning. We found out who all the baby boomers are too.

[Author]

Posts