- This topic has 140 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 12 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 20, 2007 at 1:58 PM #101987November 20, 2007 at 2:00 PM #101847
andymajumder
ParticipantThanks jimmyle. Yes I have seen that house and we really liked it, but feel its overvalued right now.
Also we want strictly follow the rule:Buy a house which is less than 3.5 times annual gross income, specially since we don’t expect our home value to appreciate much for years to come.
November 20, 2007 at 2:00 PM #101931andymajumder
ParticipantThanks jimmyle. Yes I have seen that house and we really liked it, but feel its overvalued right now.
Also we want strictly follow the rule:Buy a house which is less than 3.5 times annual gross income, specially since we don’t expect our home value to appreciate much for years to come.
November 20, 2007 at 2:00 PM #101944andymajumder
ParticipantThanks jimmyle. Yes I have seen that house and we really liked it, but feel its overvalued right now.
Also we want strictly follow the rule:Buy a house which is less than 3.5 times annual gross income, specially since we don’t expect our home value to appreciate much for years to come.
November 20, 2007 at 2:00 PM #101964andymajumder
ParticipantThanks jimmyle. Yes I have seen that house and we really liked it, but feel its overvalued right now.
Also we want strictly follow the rule:Buy a house which is less than 3.5 times annual gross income, specially since we don’t expect our home value to appreciate much for years to come.
November 20, 2007 at 2:00 PM #101992andymajumder
ParticipantThanks jimmyle. Yes I have seen that house and we really liked it, but feel its overvalued right now.
Also we want strictly follow the rule:Buy a house which is less than 3.5 times annual gross income, specially since we don’t expect our home value to appreciate much for years to come.
November 20, 2007 at 2:12 PM #101852betting on fall
Participantyour rent/buy calculation is pretty compelling, but I say hold off.
Your probably going to want to have kids soon. When the kids come, your wife is going to start saying that 1300 sq.ft. is not enough. I’d say you have a pretty good chance your going to want to move in 5 years or so if you buy this place. And I think that you would have to agree that prices in 5 years will likely be close to what they are today. Then factor in transaction costs- between sales commissions, other closing costs, and loan fees, about 8-10% of the value of the house is lost in these costs when you buy/sell.
Buying today is only for those in it for the long haul. Your odds of staying in that place for the long term seem low. Rent, save, and wait for the market to come to you.November 20, 2007 at 2:12 PM #101936betting on fall
Participantyour rent/buy calculation is pretty compelling, but I say hold off.
Your probably going to want to have kids soon. When the kids come, your wife is going to start saying that 1300 sq.ft. is not enough. I’d say you have a pretty good chance your going to want to move in 5 years or so if you buy this place. And I think that you would have to agree that prices in 5 years will likely be close to what they are today. Then factor in transaction costs- between sales commissions, other closing costs, and loan fees, about 8-10% of the value of the house is lost in these costs when you buy/sell.
Buying today is only for those in it for the long haul. Your odds of staying in that place for the long term seem low. Rent, save, and wait for the market to come to you.November 20, 2007 at 2:12 PM #101948betting on fall
Participantyour rent/buy calculation is pretty compelling, but I say hold off.
Your probably going to want to have kids soon. When the kids come, your wife is going to start saying that 1300 sq.ft. is not enough. I’d say you have a pretty good chance your going to want to move in 5 years or so if you buy this place. And I think that you would have to agree that prices in 5 years will likely be close to what they are today. Then factor in transaction costs- between sales commissions, other closing costs, and loan fees, about 8-10% of the value of the house is lost in these costs when you buy/sell.
Buying today is only for those in it for the long haul. Your odds of staying in that place for the long term seem low. Rent, save, and wait for the market to come to you.November 20, 2007 at 2:12 PM #101969betting on fall
Participantyour rent/buy calculation is pretty compelling, but I say hold off.
Your probably going to want to have kids soon. When the kids come, your wife is going to start saying that 1300 sq.ft. is not enough. I’d say you have a pretty good chance your going to want to move in 5 years or so if you buy this place. And I think that you would have to agree that prices in 5 years will likely be close to what they are today. Then factor in transaction costs- between sales commissions, other closing costs, and loan fees, about 8-10% of the value of the house is lost in these costs when you buy/sell.
Buying today is only for those in it for the long haul. Your odds of staying in that place for the long term seem low. Rent, save, and wait for the market to come to you.November 20, 2007 at 2:12 PM #101997betting on fall
Participantyour rent/buy calculation is pretty compelling, but I say hold off.
Your probably going to want to have kids soon. When the kids come, your wife is going to start saying that 1300 sq.ft. is not enough. I’d say you have a pretty good chance your going to want to move in 5 years or so if you buy this place. And I think that you would have to agree that prices in 5 years will likely be close to what they are today. Then factor in transaction costs- between sales commissions, other closing costs, and loan fees, about 8-10% of the value of the house is lost in these costs when you buy/sell.
Buying today is only for those in it for the long haul. Your odds of staying in that place for the long term seem low. Rent, save, and wait for the market to come to you.November 20, 2007 at 2:25 PM #101857Raybyrnes
Participantandymajumder
Your making the assumption that rent is the floor and that there is no chance that mortgages would fall below rents.
I would generally use this as a baseline but what if we did go into a full our recession and people did not have the ability to come up with a down payment. In this case rent could potentially be higher than a mortgage or at the very minimum be higher than a mortgage with 20% down.
November 20, 2007 at 2:25 PM #101941Raybyrnes
Participantandymajumder
Your making the assumption that rent is the floor and that there is no chance that mortgages would fall below rents.
I would generally use this as a baseline but what if we did go into a full our recession and people did not have the ability to come up with a down payment. In this case rent could potentially be higher than a mortgage or at the very minimum be higher than a mortgage with 20% down.
November 20, 2007 at 2:25 PM #101953Raybyrnes
Participantandymajumder
Your making the assumption that rent is the floor and that there is no chance that mortgages would fall below rents.
I would generally use this as a baseline but what if we did go into a full our recession and people did not have the ability to come up with a down payment. In this case rent could potentially be higher than a mortgage or at the very minimum be higher than a mortgage with 20% down.
November 20, 2007 at 2:25 PM #101974Raybyrnes
Participantandymajumder
Your making the assumption that rent is the floor and that there is no chance that mortgages would fall below rents.
I would generally use this as a baseline but what if we did go into a full our recession and people did not have the ability to come up with a down payment. In this case rent could potentially be higher than a mortgage or at the very minimum be higher than a mortgage with 20% down.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
