- This topic has 170 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by CostaMesa.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 22, 2009 at 11:24 AM #419449June 22, 2009 at 11:44 AM #418744murf2222Participant
Speaking of helmets………
Spending a lot of money on a helmet does NOT guarantee that it’s safer. In fact, there is strong evidence that the most respected helmet certification (Snell) is too stringent and may very well contribute to injuries.
The Snell test requires the helmet to survive a severe strike to the outer shell twice, in the exact same impact spot. In order to pass this test the outer shell is made so strong that it defeats the basic premise of impact absorbtion.
I had a 100 mph get-off on turn 9 at Willow Springs raceway and suffered a stage 3 concussion….even though the outter shell of my Arai stayed intact. If the shell had a little more *give* my head injury may have never occurred.
Of course it’s a fine line between too hard and too soft, so there is a lot of debate on what is the best combination. Motorcyclist magazine had a huge article on this a few years ago and they concluded that sometimes the more expensive Snell rated lids performed WORSE than the lower DOT helmets.
Murf2222
June 22, 2009 at 11:44 AM #418974murf2222ParticipantSpeaking of helmets………
Spending a lot of money on a helmet does NOT guarantee that it’s safer. In fact, there is strong evidence that the most respected helmet certification (Snell) is too stringent and may very well contribute to injuries.
The Snell test requires the helmet to survive a severe strike to the outer shell twice, in the exact same impact spot. In order to pass this test the outer shell is made so strong that it defeats the basic premise of impact absorbtion.
I had a 100 mph get-off on turn 9 at Willow Springs raceway and suffered a stage 3 concussion….even though the outter shell of my Arai stayed intact. If the shell had a little more *give* my head injury may have never occurred.
Of course it’s a fine line between too hard and too soft, so there is a lot of debate on what is the best combination. Motorcyclist magazine had a huge article on this a few years ago and they concluded that sometimes the more expensive Snell rated lids performed WORSE than the lower DOT helmets.
Murf2222
June 22, 2009 at 11:44 AM #419241murf2222ParticipantSpeaking of helmets………
Spending a lot of money on a helmet does NOT guarantee that it’s safer. In fact, there is strong evidence that the most respected helmet certification (Snell) is too stringent and may very well contribute to injuries.
The Snell test requires the helmet to survive a severe strike to the outer shell twice, in the exact same impact spot. In order to pass this test the outer shell is made so strong that it defeats the basic premise of impact absorbtion.
I had a 100 mph get-off on turn 9 at Willow Springs raceway and suffered a stage 3 concussion….even though the outter shell of my Arai stayed intact. If the shell had a little more *give* my head injury may have never occurred.
Of course it’s a fine line between too hard and too soft, so there is a lot of debate on what is the best combination. Motorcyclist magazine had a huge article on this a few years ago and they concluded that sometimes the more expensive Snell rated lids performed WORSE than the lower DOT helmets.
Murf2222
June 22, 2009 at 11:44 AM #419308murf2222ParticipantSpeaking of helmets………
Spending a lot of money on a helmet does NOT guarantee that it’s safer. In fact, there is strong evidence that the most respected helmet certification (Snell) is too stringent and may very well contribute to injuries.
The Snell test requires the helmet to survive a severe strike to the outer shell twice, in the exact same impact spot. In order to pass this test the outer shell is made so strong that it defeats the basic premise of impact absorbtion.
I had a 100 mph get-off on turn 9 at Willow Springs raceway and suffered a stage 3 concussion….even though the outter shell of my Arai stayed intact. If the shell had a little more *give* my head injury may have never occurred.
Of course it’s a fine line between too hard and too soft, so there is a lot of debate on what is the best combination. Motorcyclist magazine had a huge article on this a few years ago and they concluded that sometimes the more expensive Snell rated lids performed WORSE than the lower DOT helmets.
Murf2222
June 22, 2009 at 11:44 AM #419470murf2222ParticipantSpeaking of helmets………
Spending a lot of money on a helmet does NOT guarantee that it’s safer. In fact, there is strong evidence that the most respected helmet certification (Snell) is too stringent and may very well contribute to injuries.
The Snell test requires the helmet to survive a severe strike to the outer shell twice, in the exact same impact spot. In order to pass this test the outer shell is made so strong that it defeats the basic premise of impact absorbtion.
I had a 100 mph get-off on turn 9 at Willow Springs raceway and suffered a stage 3 concussion….even though the outter shell of my Arai stayed intact. If the shell had a little more *give* my head injury may have never occurred.
Of course it’s a fine line between too hard and too soft, so there is a lot of debate on what is the best combination. Motorcyclist magazine had a huge article on this a few years ago and they concluded that sometimes the more expensive Snell rated lids performed WORSE than the lower DOT helmets.
Murf2222
June 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM #418797CascaParticipantAmen Murf, that’s why I don’t get too concerned. Anything that is going to whack my gourd hard enough to break the helmet is probably going to break the rest of me too.
We went through this microfracture business with kevlar helmets too. Believe me, kevlar helmets take an ass-whiping in the field. Worrying about their level of degradation is something best left to old women.
June 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM #419028CascaParticipantAmen Murf, that’s why I don’t get too concerned. Anything that is going to whack my gourd hard enough to break the helmet is probably going to break the rest of me too.
We went through this microfracture business with kevlar helmets too. Believe me, kevlar helmets take an ass-whiping in the field. Worrying about their level of degradation is something best left to old women.
June 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM #419295CascaParticipantAmen Murf, that’s why I don’t get too concerned. Anything that is going to whack my gourd hard enough to break the helmet is probably going to break the rest of me too.
We went through this microfracture business with kevlar helmets too. Believe me, kevlar helmets take an ass-whiping in the field. Worrying about their level of degradation is something best left to old women.
June 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM #419362CascaParticipantAmen Murf, that’s why I don’t get too concerned. Anything that is going to whack my gourd hard enough to break the helmet is probably going to break the rest of me too.
We went through this microfracture business with kevlar helmets too. Believe me, kevlar helmets take an ass-whiping in the field. Worrying about their level of degradation is something best left to old women.
June 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM #419524CascaParticipantAmen Murf, that’s why I don’t get too concerned. Anything that is going to whack my gourd hard enough to break the helmet is probably going to break the rest of me too.
We went through this microfracture business with kevlar helmets too. Believe me, kevlar helmets take an ass-whiping in the field. Worrying about their level of degradation is something best left to old women.
June 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM #418802scaredyclassicParticipantok, i could be wrong about the used helmet thing. i concede that. but not about starting on a smaller bike. i am unwilling to budge an inch on that issue.
June 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM #419033scaredyclassicParticipantok, i could be wrong about the used helmet thing. i concede that. but not about starting on a smaller bike. i am unwilling to budge an inch on that issue.
June 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM #419300scaredyclassicParticipantok, i could be wrong about the used helmet thing. i concede that. but not about starting on a smaller bike. i am unwilling to budge an inch on that issue.
June 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM #419367scaredyclassicParticipantok, i could be wrong about the used helmet thing. i concede that. but not about starting on a smaller bike. i am unwilling to budge an inch on that issue.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.