- This topic has 345 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
an.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 5, 2008 at 12:00 PM #266802September 5, 2008 at 12:53 PM #266503
an
ParticipantFLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.
September 5, 2008 at 12:53 PM #266721an
ParticipantFLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.
September 5, 2008 at 12:53 PM #266735an
ParticipantFLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.
September 5, 2008 at 12:53 PM #266779an
ParticipantFLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.
September 5, 2008 at 12:53 PM #266813an
ParticipantFLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.
September 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM #266573Anonymous
GuestIt is simply impossible to send all the kids to better schools. The solutions are:
(1) Make all schools equally good (or bad), AKA communism.
(2) Choice by merit.
(3) Choice by money.
(4) Choice by lottery.
(5) A mixture of the above.Back to the core point, if you can afford to send your kids to most desirable private schools, you will probably not live in MM anyway. That is my point. The school performance is an indicator of the neighborhood. Even if you have no kid and don’t plan to have kid, you are still likely to live in an area with people similar to you. If you income can support SFR in CV, you may decide to live in less expensive areas such as 4S. However, you are very unlikely to live in Escondido or San Marcos.
[quote=asianautica]FLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.[/quote]
September 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM #266791Anonymous
GuestIt is simply impossible to send all the kids to better schools. The solutions are:
(1) Make all schools equally good (or bad), AKA communism.
(2) Choice by merit.
(3) Choice by money.
(4) Choice by lottery.
(5) A mixture of the above.Back to the core point, if you can afford to send your kids to most desirable private schools, you will probably not live in MM anyway. That is my point. The school performance is an indicator of the neighborhood. Even if you have no kid and don’t plan to have kid, you are still likely to live in an area with people similar to you. If you income can support SFR in CV, you may decide to live in less expensive areas such as 4S. However, you are very unlikely to live in Escondido or San Marcos.
[quote=asianautica]FLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.[/quote]
September 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM #266804Anonymous
GuestIt is simply impossible to send all the kids to better schools. The solutions are:
(1) Make all schools equally good (or bad), AKA communism.
(2) Choice by merit.
(3) Choice by money.
(4) Choice by lottery.
(5) A mixture of the above.Back to the core point, if you can afford to send your kids to most desirable private schools, you will probably not live in MM anyway. That is my point. The school performance is an indicator of the neighborhood. Even if you have no kid and don’t plan to have kid, you are still likely to live in an area with people similar to you. If you income can support SFR in CV, you may decide to live in less expensive areas such as 4S. However, you are very unlikely to live in Escondido or San Marcos.
[quote=asianautica]FLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.[/quote]
September 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM #266849Anonymous
GuestIt is simply impossible to send all the kids to better schools. The solutions are:
(1) Make all schools equally good (or bad), AKA communism.
(2) Choice by merit.
(3) Choice by money.
(4) Choice by lottery.
(5) A mixture of the above.Back to the core point, if you can afford to send your kids to most desirable private schools, you will probably not live in MM anyway. That is my point. The school performance is an indicator of the neighborhood. Even if you have no kid and don’t plan to have kid, you are still likely to live in an area with people similar to you. If you income can support SFR in CV, you may decide to live in less expensive areas such as 4S. However, you are very unlikely to live in Escondido or San Marcos.
[quote=asianautica]FLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.[/quote]
September 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM #266883Anonymous
GuestIt is simply impossible to send all the kids to better schools. The solutions are:
(1) Make all schools equally good (or bad), AKA communism.
(2) Choice by merit.
(3) Choice by money.
(4) Choice by lottery.
(5) A mixture of the above.Back to the core point, if you can afford to send your kids to most desirable private schools, you will probably not live in MM anyway. That is my point. The school performance is an indicator of the neighborhood. Even if you have no kid and don’t plan to have kid, you are still likely to live in an area with people similar to you. If you income can support SFR in CV, you may decide to live in less expensive areas such as 4S. However, you are very unlikely to live in Escondido or San Marcos.
[quote=asianautica]FLU, I think there will be more parents in MM who would want this than parents in CV who don’t want this. Do you see my point? Also, if this comes true, I wouldn’t want to send my kids to CV schools anyways, I rather send them to private schools, where class sizes will be 1/2 – 1/3 of the class size of CV schools. So, CV parents can have their CV schools, I’ll go straight for the best. The majority rules in this country and it seems like the majority are sending their kids to school worse than CV and want to send their kids to schools in the same as or better than CV schools.[/quote]
September 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #266588an
Participant[quote=goldfish]It is simply impossible to send all the kids to better schools. The solutions are:
(1) Make all schools equally good (or bad), AKA communism.
(2) Choice by merit.
(3) Choice by money.
(4) Choice by lottery.
(5) A mixture of the above.Back to the core point, if you can afford to send your kids to most desirable private schools, you will probably not live in MM anyway. That is my point. The school performance is an indicator of the neighborhood. Even if you have no kid and don’t plan to have kid, you are still likely to live in an area with people similar to you. If you income can support SFR in CV, you may decide to live in less expensive areas such as 4S. However, you are very unlikely to live in Escondido or San Marcos.
[/quote]
Just because it’s impossible to make all the schools better, doesn’t mean people have to be stuck in their social-economic wrung without an easier way to advance through education. Through choice, you’ll have competition. Competition is what spawn all the new advancements and improvements. US has one of the best University systems, why not apply that to our K-12.I have to dispute your assumption. I’m one of those parents who would live in MM and send my kids to private school.
September 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #266806an
Participant[quote=goldfish]It is simply impossible to send all the kids to better schools. The solutions are:
(1) Make all schools equally good (or bad), AKA communism.
(2) Choice by merit.
(3) Choice by money.
(4) Choice by lottery.
(5) A mixture of the above.Back to the core point, if you can afford to send your kids to most desirable private schools, you will probably not live in MM anyway. That is my point. The school performance is an indicator of the neighborhood. Even if you have no kid and don’t plan to have kid, you are still likely to live in an area with people similar to you. If you income can support SFR in CV, you may decide to live in less expensive areas such as 4S. However, you are very unlikely to live in Escondido or San Marcos.
[/quote]
Just because it’s impossible to make all the schools better, doesn’t mean people have to be stuck in their social-economic wrung without an easier way to advance through education. Through choice, you’ll have competition. Competition is what spawn all the new advancements and improvements. US has one of the best University systems, why not apply that to our K-12.I have to dispute your assumption. I’m one of those parents who would live in MM and send my kids to private school.
September 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #266820an
Participant[quote=goldfish]It is simply impossible to send all the kids to better schools. The solutions are:
(1) Make all schools equally good (or bad), AKA communism.
(2) Choice by merit.
(3) Choice by money.
(4) Choice by lottery.
(5) A mixture of the above.Back to the core point, if you can afford to send your kids to most desirable private schools, you will probably not live in MM anyway. That is my point. The school performance is an indicator of the neighborhood. Even if you have no kid and don’t plan to have kid, you are still likely to live in an area with people similar to you. If you income can support SFR in CV, you may decide to live in less expensive areas such as 4S. However, you are very unlikely to live in Escondido or San Marcos.
[/quote]
Just because it’s impossible to make all the schools better, doesn’t mean people have to be stuck in their social-economic wrung without an easier way to advance through education. Through choice, you’ll have competition. Competition is what spawn all the new advancements and improvements. US has one of the best University systems, why not apply that to our K-12.I have to dispute your assumption. I’m one of those parents who would live in MM and send my kids to private school.
September 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #266865an
Participant[quote=goldfish]It is simply impossible to send all the kids to better schools. The solutions are:
(1) Make all schools equally good (or bad), AKA communism.
(2) Choice by merit.
(3) Choice by money.
(4) Choice by lottery.
(5) A mixture of the above.Back to the core point, if you can afford to send your kids to most desirable private schools, you will probably not live in MM anyway. That is my point. The school performance is an indicator of the neighborhood. Even if you have no kid and don’t plan to have kid, you are still likely to live in an area with people similar to you. If you income can support SFR in CV, you may decide to live in less expensive areas such as 4S. However, you are very unlikely to live in Escondido or San Marcos.
[/quote]
Just because it’s impossible to make all the schools better, doesn’t mean people have to be stuck in their social-economic wrung without an easier way to advance through education. Through choice, you’ll have competition. Competition is what spawn all the new advancements and improvements. US has one of the best University systems, why not apply that to our K-12.I have to dispute your assumption. I’m one of those parents who would live in MM and send my kids to private school.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.