- This topic has 140 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
Cube.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 7, 2010 at 8:17 AM #523017March 7, 2010 at 2:03 PM #522198
sdduuuude
ParticipantAlso, your solar “cost per kwH” goes down as you purchase more panels because you need some conditioning equipment (inverters, rectifiers, etc.) that convert the DC power from the panels to AC that can be put back on the grid. That stuff is fairly pricey, and you need one for every X panels.
Also, notice the “tiered” cost this creates. i.e. if you buy X+1 panels, your cost per kwh goes up.
March 7, 2010 at 2:03 PM #522337sdduuuude
ParticipantAlso, your solar “cost per kwH” goes down as you purchase more panels because you need some conditioning equipment (inverters, rectifiers, etc.) that convert the DC power from the panels to AC that can be put back on the grid. That stuff is fairly pricey, and you need one for every X panels.
Also, notice the “tiered” cost this creates. i.e. if you buy X+1 panels, your cost per kwh goes up.
March 7, 2010 at 2:03 PM #522774sdduuuude
ParticipantAlso, your solar “cost per kwH” goes down as you purchase more panels because you need some conditioning equipment (inverters, rectifiers, etc.) that convert the DC power from the panels to AC that can be put back on the grid. That stuff is fairly pricey, and you need one for every X panels.
Also, notice the “tiered” cost this creates. i.e. if you buy X+1 panels, your cost per kwh goes up.
March 7, 2010 at 2:03 PM #522868sdduuuude
ParticipantAlso, your solar “cost per kwH” goes down as you purchase more panels because you need some conditioning equipment (inverters, rectifiers, etc.) that convert the DC power from the panels to AC that can be put back on the grid. That stuff is fairly pricey, and you need one for every X panels.
Also, notice the “tiered” cost this creates. i.e. if you buy X+1 panels, your cost per kwh goes up.
March 7, 2010 at 2:03 PM #523127sdduuuude
ParticipantAlso, your solar “cost per kwH” goes down as you purchase more panels because you need some conditioning equipment (inverters, rectifiers, etc.) that convert the DC power from the panels to AC that can be put back on the grid. That stuff is fairly pricey, and you need one for every X panels.
Also, notice the “tiered” cost this creates. i.e. if you buy X+1 panels, your cost per kwh goes up.
March 7, 2010 at 8:57 PM #522365sd_matt
ParticipantThere’s a new idea every day it seems. Surely one of these will pan out without govt help. I say hang tight.
March 7, 2010 at 8:57 PM #522507sd_matt
ParticipantThere’s a new idea every day it seems. Surely one of these will pan out without govt help. I say hang tight.
March 7, 2010 at 8:57 PM #522944sd_matt
ParticipantThere’s a new idea every day it seems. Surely one of these will pan out without govt help. I say hang tight.
March 7, 2010 at 8:57 PM #523038sd_matt
ParticipantThere’s a new idea every day it seems. Surely one of these will pan out without govt help. I say hang tight.
March 7, 2010 at 8:57 PM #523297sd_matt
ParticipantThere’s a new idea every day it seems. Surely one of these will pan out without govt help. I say hang tight.
March 7, 2010 at 10:38 PM #522400Cube
Participant“Virtual” Mello-Roos Districts for financing solar:
I don’t think I’ve seen this mentioned yet on this thread. From what I understand, AB 1709 allows for the creation of virtual Mello-Roos districts for financing solar. The idea is to use the preferred financing rates that cities and counties can command (perhaps used to command?) to finance solar installations on participating homes and then have a 20 year assessment against that home until paid in full. In theory, this provides lower rates and also automatically transfers the financing of the solar to a future owner should the current owner sell before the installation is paid off.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1701-1750/ab_1709_cfa_20080619_142720_sen_comm.html
I’m very interested in solar on my house some day, and I do find this idea interesting.
Here’s a North County Times article on the subject from last January. Not sure if anything has come of this in San Diego or not…
http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sdcounty/article_0a38ee02-8cf6-55d5-aeaa-9202d4469c3d.html
March 7, 2010 at 10:38 PM #522542Cube
Participant“Virtual” Mello-Roos Districts for financing solar:
I don’t think I’ve seen this mentioned yet on this thread. From what I understand, AB 1709 allows for the creation of virtual Mello-Roos districts for financing solar. The idea is to use the preferred financing rates that cities and counties can command (perhaps used to command?) to finance solar installations on participating homes and then have a 20 year assessment against that home until paid in full. In theory, this provides lower rates and also automatically transfers the financing of the solar to a future owner should the current owner sell before the installation is paid off.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1701-1750/ab_1709_cfa_20080619_142720_sen_comm.html
I’m very interested in solar on my house some day, and I do find this idea interesting.
Here’s a North County Times article on the subject from last January. Not sure if anything has come of this in San Diego or not…
http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sdcounty/article_0a38ee02-8cf6-55d5-aeaa-9202d4469c3d.html
March 7, 2010 at 10:38 PM #522980Cube
Participant“Virtual” Mello-Roos Districts for financing solar:
I don’t think I’ve seen this mentioned yet on this thread. From what I understand, AB 1709 allows for the creation of virtual Mello-Roos districts for financing solar. The idea is to use the preferred financing rates that cities and counties can command (perhaps used to command?) to finance solar installations on participating homes and then have a 20 year assessment against that home until paid in full. In theory, this provides lower rates and also automatically transfers the financing of the solar to a future owner should the current owner sell before the installation is paid off.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1701-1750/ab_1709_cfa_20080619_142720_sen_comm.html
I’m very interested in solar on my house some day, and I do find this idea interesting.
Here’s a North County Times article on the subject from last January. Not sure if anything has come of this in San Diego or not…
http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sdcounty/article_0a38ee02-8cf6-55d5-aeaa-9202d4469c3d.html
March 7, 2010 at 10:38 PM #523073Cube
Participant“Virtual” Mello-Roos Districts for financing solar:
I don’t think I’ve seen this mentioned yet on this thread. From what I understand, AB 1709 allows for the creation of virtual Mello-Roos districts for financing solar. The idea is to use the preferred financing rates that cities and counties can command (perhaps used to command?) to finance solar installations on participating homes and then have a 20 year assessment against that home until paid in full. In theory, this provides lower rates and also automatically transfers the financing of the solar to a future owner should the current owner sell before the installation is paid off.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1701-1750/ab_1709_cfa_20080619_142720_sen_comm.html
I’m very interested in solar on my house some day, and I do find this idea interesting.
Here’s a North County Times article on the subject from last January. Not sure if anything has come of this in San Diego or not…
http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sdcounty/article_0a38ee02-8cf6-55d5-aeaa-9202d4469c3d.html
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
