- This topic has 276 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
PCinSD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 23, 2008 at 2:34 PM #260977August 23, 2008 at 2:34 PM #261019
Aecetia
ParticipantInvestment rental.
January 15, 2009 at 7:18 PM #329606garysears
ParticipantI felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.
January 15, 2009 at 7:18 PM #329946garysears
ParticipantI felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.
January 15, 2009 at 7:18 PM #330019garysears
ParticipantI felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.
January 15, 2009 at 7:18 PM #330047garysears
ParticipantI felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.
January 15, 2009 at 7:18 PM #330130garysears
ParticipantI felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.
January 15, 2009 at 7:27 PM #329617thebazman
Participant[quote=garysears]I felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.[/quote]
That graph really illustrates the price avalanche!
As an example, those light blue condos on Pierce St. next to I-8 were selling at 240-250K in the summer of 2006. SD Lookup showed, after the properties moved into REO status, closing prices around 90-100K. That’s over a 50% reduction in sales price!
January 15, 2009 at 7:27 PM #329956thebazman
Participant[quote=garysears]I felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.[/quote]
That graph really illustrates the price avalanche!
As an example, those light blue condos on Pierce St. next to I-8 were selling at 240-250K in the summer of 2006. SD Lookup showed, after the properties moved into REO status, closing prices around 90-100K. That’s over a 50% reduction in sales price!
January 15, 2009 at 7:27 PM #330029thebazman
Participant[quote=garysears]I felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.[/quote]
That graph really illustrates the price avalanche!
As an example, those light blue condos on Pierce St. next to I-8 were selling at 240-250K in the summer of 2006. SD Lookup showed, after the properties moved into REO status, closing prices around 90-100K. That’s over a 50% reduction in sales price!
January 15, 2009 at 7:27 PM #330057thebazman
Participant[quote=garysears]I felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.[/quote]
That graph really illustrates the price avalanche!
As an example, those light blue condos on Pierce St. next to I-8 were selling at 240-250K in the summer of 2006. SD Lookup showed, after the properties moved into REO status, closing prices around 90-100K. That’s over a 50% reduction in sales price!
January 15, 2009 at 7:27 PM #330140thebazman
Participant[quote=garysears]I felt the need to close out my comments on El Cajon condo complexes. The floor seems to be in on prices at 745 Bradley at late 2000 values. More than 75% off the 2005 peak! That’s right. People were paying 3-4x what they could have if only they would have been patient.
A few knife catchers that bought at 50% off peak, thinking they were getting a good deal, saw multiple units sell for less than half within a few months. Here is the graph.
Watching the declines these past two years has been nothing short of spectacular. Tracking these listings and sales has been a rewarding pursuit but I’m looking at SFRs now that owning makes sense in some areas. For the 2bd condo conversions not yet under 100K in El Cajon I would assume prices will continue to fall.
And to think we were once debating whether 120K was even possible for these units.
Nothing to see here…move along.[/quote]
That graph really illustrates the price avalanche!
As an example, those light blue condos on Pierce St. next to I-8 were selling at 240-250K in the summer of 2006. SD Lookup showed, after the properties moved into REO status, closing prices around 90-100K. That’s over a 50% reduction in sales price!
January 15, 2009 at 7:32 PM #329622PCinSD
GuestMy friend paid $275k for one on Pierce Street. It was with the help of a silent second with the City of El Cajon, or something. The unit next to him is on the market for $100k. He’s currently looking to rent it out. He can easily afford the payment but it sucks to see a friend take that kind of “loss”.
January 15, 2009 at 7:32 PM #329961PCinSD
GuestMy friend paid $275k for one on Pierce Street. It was with the help of a silent second with the City of El Cajon, or something. The unit next to him is on the market for $100k. He’s currently looking to rent it out. He can easily afford the payment but it sucks to see a friend take that kind of “loss”.
January 15, 2009 at 7:32 PM #330034PCinSD
GuestMy friend paid $275k for one on Pierce Street. It was with the help of a silent second with the City of El Cajon, or something. The unit next to him is on the market for $100k. He’s currently looking to rent it out. He can easily afford the payment but it sucks to see a friend take that kind of “loss”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

