- This topic has 70 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 2, 2009 at 7:19 PM #322863January 2, 2009 at 7:32 PM #323287HLSParticipant
Rust,
I have multiple sources to check. There are huge spreads every day between lenders.
Rates change constantly. If you want to check my rates then contact me. If you aren’t comparing rates at the same moment, then you may not be comparing apples to apples.
I have had online rates change while on the phone with borrowers.
Different lenders have different rates all day long.It also depends on the rest of the closing costs that you are charged.
My wholesale + 1 point could easily be less than Wells + 1/2 point.
January 2, 2009 at 7:32 PM #323209HLSParticipantRust,
I have multiple sources to check. There are huge spreads every day between lenders.
Rates change constantly. If you want to check my rates then contact me. If you aren’t comparing rates at the same moment, then you may not be comparing apples to apples.
I have had online rates change while on the phone with borrowers.
Different lenders have different rates all day long.It also depends on the rest of the closing costs that you are charged.
My wholesale + 1 point could easily be less than Wells + 1/2 point.
January 2, 2009 at 7:32 PM #322868HLSParticipantRust,
I have multiple sources to check. There are huge spreads every day between lenders.
Rates change constantly. If you want to check my rates then contact me. If you aren’t comparing rates at the same moment, then you may not be comparing apples to apples.
I have had online rates change while on the phone with borrowers.
Different lenders have different rates all day long.It also depends on the rest of the closing costs that you are charged.
My wholesale + 1 point could easily be less than Wells + 1/2 point.
January 2, 2009 at 7:32 PM #323270HLSParticipantRust,
I have multiple sources to check. There are huge spreads every day between lenders.
Rates change constantly. If you want to check my rates then contact me. If you aren’t comparing rates at the same moment, then you may not be comparing apples to apples.
I have had online rates change while on the phone with borrowers.
Different lenders have different rates all day long.It also depends on the rest of the closing costs that you are charged.
My wholesale + 1 point could easily be less than Wells + 1/2 point.
January 2, 2009 at 7:32 PM #323366HLSParticipantRust,
I have multiple sources to check. There are huge spreads every day between lenders.
Rates change constantly. If you want to check my rates then contact me. If you aren’t comparing rates at the same moment, then you may not be comparing apples to apples.
I have had online rates change while on the phone with borrowers.
Different lenders have different rates all day long.It also depends on the rest of the closing costs that you are charged.
My wholesale + 1 point could easily be less than Wells + 1/2 point.
January 2, 2009 at 7:35 PM #323302HLSParticipantDP
January 2, 2009 at 7:35 PM #322883HLSParticipantDP
January 2, 2009 at 7:35 PM #323285HLSParticipantDP
January 2, 2009 at 7:35 PM #323381HLSParticipantDP
January 2, 2009 at 7:35 PM #323224HLSParticipantDP
January 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM #323275HLSParticipantUrban,,,
I understood your original comment.My understanding of the disclosure bit was that a few years back, mortgage brokers were cutting into banks mortgage lending business. Banks were overcharging and getting away with it, kinda like AT&T overcharging for phone service until they had competition.
The johns in govt (called lobbyists) for the banking industry paid the whores (known as congress people) to “protect” consumers via influence.
It was decided that mortgage brokerage industry would have to disclose their backdoor compensation through escrow on the closing statement marked “poc” BUT banks didn’t have to disclose their internal manipulation, thus protecting consumers.
It gave the illusion that banks didn’t charge fees, but brokers did. It was a lie.Nobody wanted to admit that bank rates were higher because of this.
In reality it was the johns paying the whores to get their way and protect profits, it had nothing to do with consumer protection, it had to do with bank profits.
The mortgage broker industry was designed to offer consumers an alternate from being overcharged by banks and it worked for awhile. Then many mortgage brokers got carried away charging ridiculous fees to cluless, uneducated consumers and they got away with it.
Retail banks didn’t do subprime loans, but brokers did. It became a multi ring circus and a free for all without any govt intervention.
Brokers made banks become more competitive, and then brokers got greedy.
It is still possible to get better loans from a reasonable broker. From an average broker you will get overcharged. (Banks aren’t losing money by doing loans)
Many people are on the edge of getting a great loan, but don’t get help from a bank employee OR most brokers. They just get shoved into an FHA loan because it’s easy, not because it’s the best thing for the borrower.
I don’t care if banks show a higher rate with no fees and I disclose a lower rate with a fee.
So much more can be said….. HLS
January 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM #323371HLSParticipantUrban,,,
I understood your original comment.My understanding of the disclosure bit was that a few years back, mortgage brokers were cutting into banks mortgage lending business. Banks were overcharging and getting away with it, kinda like AT&T overcharging for phone service until they had competition.
The johns in govt (called lobbyists) for the banking industry paid the whores (known as congress people) to “protect” consumers via influence.
It was decided that mortgage brokerage industry would have to disclose their backdoor compensation through escrow on the closing statement marked “poc” BUT banks didn’t have to disclose their internal manipulation, thus protecting consumers.
It gave the illusion that banks didn’t charge fees, but brokers did. It was a lie.Nobody wanted to admit that bank rates were higher because of this.
In reality it was the johns paying the whores to get their way and protect profits, it had nothing to do with consumer protection, it had to do with bank profits.
The mortgage broker industry was designed to offer consumers an alternate from being overcharged by banks and it worked for awhile. Then many mortgage brokers got carried away charging ridiculous fees to cluless, uneducated consumers and they got away with it.
Retail banks didn’t do subprime loans, but brokers did. It became a multi ring circus and a free for all without any govt intervention.
Brokers made banks become more competitive, and then brokers got greedy.
It is still possible to get better loans from a reasonable broker. From an average broker you will get overcharged. (Banks aren’t losing money by doing loans)
Many people are on the edge of getting a great loan, but don’t get help from a bank employee OR most brokers. They just get shoved into an FHA loan because it’s easy, not because it’s the best thing for the borrower.
I don’t care if banks show a higher rate with no fees and I disclose a lower rate with a fee.
So much more can be said….. HLS
January 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM #323214HLSParticipantUrban,,,
I understood your original comment.My understanding of the disclosure bit was that a few years back, mortgage brokers were cutting into banks mortgage lending business. Banks were overcharging and getting away with it, kinda like AT&T overcharging for phone service until they had competition.
The johns in govt (called lobbyists) for the banking industry paid the whores (known as congress people) to “protect” consumers via influence.
It was decided that mortgage brokerage industry would have to disclose their backdoor compensation through escrow on the closing statement marked “poc” BUT banks didn’t have to disclose their internal manipulation, thus protecting consumers.
It gave the illusion that banks didn’t charge fees, but brokers did. It was a lie.Nobody wanted to admit that bank rates were higher because of this.
In reality it was the johns paying the whores to get their way and protect profits, it had nothing to do with consumer protection, it had to do with bank profits.
The mortgage broker industry was designed to offer consumers an alternate from being overcharged by banks and it worked for awhile. Then many mortgage brokers got carried away charging ridiculous fees to cluless, uneducated consumers and they got away with it.
Retail banks didn’t do subprime loans, but brokers did. It became a multi ring circus and a free for all without any govt intervention.
Brokers made banks become more competitive, and then brokers got greedy.
It is still possible to get better loans from a reasonable broker. From an average broker you will get overcharged. (Banks aren’t losing money by doing loans)
Many people are on the edge of getting a great loan, but don’t get help from a bank employee OR most brokers. They just get shoved into an FHA loan because it’s easy, not because it’s the best thing for the borrower.
I don’t care if banks show a higher rate with no fees and I disclose a lower rate with a fee.
So much more can be said….. HLS
January 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM #323292HLSParticipantUrban,,,
I understood your original comment.My understanding of the disclosure bit was that a few years back, mortgage brokers were cutting into banks mortgage lending business. Banks were overcharging and getting away with it, kinda like AT&T overcharging for phone service until they had competition.
The johns in govt (called lobbyists) for the banking industry paid the whores (known as congress people) to “protect” consumers via influence.
It was decided that mortgage brokerage industry would have to disclose their backdoor compensation through escrow on the closing statement marked “poc” BUT banks didn’t have to disclose their internal manipulation, thus protecting consumers.
It gave the illusion that banks didn’t charge fees, but brokers did. It was a lie.Nobody wanted to admit that bank rates were higher because of this.
In reality it was the johns paying the whores to get their way and protect profits, it had nothing to do with consumer protection, it had to do with bank profits.
The mortgage broker industry was designed to offer consumers an alternate from being overcharged by banks and it worked for awhile. Then many mortgage brokers got carried away charging ridiculous fees to cluless, uneducated consumers and they got away with it.
Retail banks didn’t do subprime loans, but brokers did. It became a multi ring circus and a free for all without any govt intervention.
Brokers made banks become more competitive, and then brokers got greedy.
It is still possible to get better loans from a reasonable broker. From an average broker you will get overcharged. (Banks aren’t losing money by doing loans)
Many people are on the edge of getting a great loan, but don’t get help from a bank employee OR most brokers. They just get shoved into an FHA loan because it’s easy, not because it’s the best thing for the borrower.
I don’t care if banks show a higher rate with no fees and I disclose a lower rate with a fee.
So much more can be said….. HLS
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.