- This topic has 195 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM #320277December 24, 2008 at 9:20 AM #319822CoronitaParticipant
[quote=esmith]I found a curious fact in the internet.
Apparently, a third of all students in Torrey Pines High School are Jewish. The school even had to make Yom Kippur an official holiday because they were consistently having large numbers of absentees on that day. That’s in addition to a quarter of Asians and 10% of Latino students.
Not that there’s anything wrong with it![/quote]
I thought a good portion of San Diego was pretty much owned by the Jacob family π
December 24, 2008 at 9:20 AM #320171CoronitaParticipant[quote=esmith]I found a curious fact in the internet.
Apparently, a third of all students in Torrey Pines High School are Jewish. The school even had to make Yom Kippur an official holiday because they were consistently having large numbers of absentees on that day. That’s in addition to a quarter of Asians and 10% of Latino students.
Not that there’s anything wrong with it![/quote]
I thought a good portion of San Diego was pretty much owned by the Jacob family π
December 24, 2008 at 9:20 AM #320221CoronitaParticipant[quote=esmith]I found a curious fact in the internet.
Apparently, a third of all students in Torrey Pines High School are Jewish. The school even had to make Yom Kippur an official holiday because they were consistently having large numbers of absentees on that day. That’s in addition to a quarter of Asians and 10% of Latino students.
Not that there’s anything wrong with it![/quote]
I thought a good portion of San Diego was pretty much owned by the Jacob family π
December 24, 2008 at 9:20 AM #320239CoronitaParticipant[quote=esmith]I found a curious fact in the internet.
Apparently, a third of all students in Torrey Pines High School are Jewish. The school even had to make Yom Kippur an official holiday because they were consistently having large numbers of absentees on that day. That’s in addition to a quarter of Asians and 10% of Latino students.
Not that there’s anything wrong with it![/quote]
I thought a good portion of San Diego was pretty much owned by the Jacob family π
December 24, 2008 at 9:20 AM #320321CoronitaParticipant[quote=esmith]I found a curious fact in the internet.
Apparently, a third of all students in Torrey Pines High School are Jewish. The school even had to make Yom Kippur an official holiday because they were consistently having large numbers of absentees on that day. That’s in addition to a quarter of Asians and 10% of Latino students.
Not that there’s anything wrong with it![/quote]
I thought a good portion of San Diego was pretty much owned by the Jacob family π
December 26, 2008 at 9:44 PM #320348cabalParticipantMy son attended La Jolla Country Day School for a few years. As a CV area resident, he currently attends CV schools. Sometimes I regret pulling him out of LJCDS.
With regards to parental involvement, I give CV schools a slight edge. Many LJCDS parents are busy and have nannies drop/pick up kids. There is little casual encounters among parents except at organized school events. For class size, LJCDS is smaller. I remember my sons K class had about 10 kids and 2 full time degreed teachers. For curriculum and overall enrichment, LJCDS wins hands down.
December 26, 2008 at 9:44 PM #320694cabalParticipantMy son attended La Jolla Country Day School for a few years. As a CV area resident, he currently attends CV schools. Sometimes I regret pulling him out of LJCDS.
With regards to parental involvement, I give CV schools a slight edge. Many LJCDS parents are busy and have nannies drop/pick up kids. There is little casual encounters among parents except at organized school events. For class size, LJCDS is smaller. I remember my sons K class had about 10 kids and 2 full time degreed teachers. For curriculum and overall enrichment, LJCDS wins hands down.
December 26, 2008 at 9:44 PM #320748cabalParticipantMy son attended La Jolla Country Day School for a few years. As a CV area resident, he currently attends CV schools. Sometimes I regret pulling him out of LJCDS.
With regards to parental involvement, I give CV schools a slight edge. Many LJCDS parents are busy and have nannies drop/pick up kids. There is little casual encounters among parents except at organized school events. For class size, LJCDS is smaller. I remember my sons K class had about 10 kids and 2 full time degreed teachers. For curriculum and overall enrichment, LJCDS wins hands down.
December 26, 2008 at 9:44 PM #320765cabalParticipantMy son attended La Jolla Country Day School for a few years. As a CV area resident, he currently attends CV schools. Sometimes I regret pulling him out of LJCDS.
With regards to parental involvement, I give CV schools a slight edge. Many LJCDS parents are busy and have nannies drop/pick up kids. There is little casual encounters among parents except at organized school events. For class size, LJCDS is smaller. I remember my sons K class had about 10 kids and 2 full time degreed teachers. For curriculum and overall enrichment, LJCDS wins hands down.
December 26, 2008 at 9:44 PM #320846cabalParticipantMy son attended La Jolla Country Day School for a few years. As a CV area resident, he currently attends CV schools. Sometimes I regret pulling him out of LJCDS.
With regards to parental involvement, I give CV schools a slight edge. Many LJCDS parents are busy and have nannies drop/pick up kids. There is little casual encounters among parents except at organized school events. For class size, LJCDS is smaller. I remember my sons K class had about 10 kids and 2 full time degreed teachers. For curriculum and overall enrichment, LJCDS wins hands down.
December 27, 2008 at 4:48 PM #320602CA renterParticipant[quote=afx114]I think we also need to challenge the idea that higher income schools equal better quality teachers. Some of the smartest people I know are teachers, and they chose to take a lower salary to teach in lower-income and less “prestigious” schools because of their desire to make a difference and help out those who are less fortunate. I know a lot of teachers, and all of them have chosen this route. I wonder if this is just my personal little anecdote, or whether it has legs beyond my circle of teacher friends.[/quote]
I’ve worked in both low-income and high-income schools and concur with your findings.
Higher scores usually have very little to do with the talent or drive of the individual teachers, and in my experience, the teachers in low-income schools have to work five times harder to get the same results as their counterparts at the high-income schools (if they are lucky).
For those of you who have never worked in a variety of schools, you would not believe the disparity in student abilities upon entering kindergarten. From that point, teachers are working like mad to make up the difference, and very few of these students will ever truly catch up, let alone excel. It is sad, and this is the reason you see an emphasis on “0-3” education. Hate to say it, but a child’s foundation (early years — nurturing and exposure to “academic” and general knowledge) is critical.
December 27, 2008 at 4:48 PM #320949CA renterParticipant[quote=afx114]I think we also need to challenge the idea that higher income schools equal better quality teachers. Some of the smartest people I know are teachers, and they chose to take a lower salary to teach in lower-income and less “prestigious” schools because of their desire to make a difference and help out those who are less fortunate. I know a lot of teachers, and all of them have chosen this route. I wonder if this is just my personal little anecdote, or whether it has legs beyond my circle of teacher friends.[/quote]
I’ve worked in both low-income and high-income schools and concur with your findings.
Higher scores usually have very little to do with the talent or drive of the individual teachers, and in my experience, the teachers in low-income schools have to work five times harder to get the same results as their counterparts at the high-income schools (if they are lucky).
For those of you who have never worked in a variety of schools, you would not believe the disparity in student abilities upon entering kindergarten. From that point, teachers are working like mad to make up the difference, and very few of these students will ever truly catch up, let alone excel. It is sad, and this is the reason you see an emphasis on “0-3” education. Hate to say it, but a child’s foundation (early years — nurturing and exposure to “academic” and general knowledge) is critical.
December 27, 2008 at 4:48 PM #321003CA renterParticipant[quote=afx114]I think we also need to challenge the idea that higher income schools equal better quality teachers. Some of the smartest people I know are teachers, and they chose to take a lower salary to teach in lower-income and less “prestigious” schools because of their desire to make a difference and help out those who are less fortunate. I know a lot of teachers, and all of them have chosen this route. I wonder if this is just my personal little anecdote, or whether it has legs beyond my circle of teacher friends.[/quote]
I’ve worked in both low-income and high-income schools and concur with your findings.
Higher scores usually have very little to do with the talent or drive of the individual teachers, and in my experience, the teachers in low-income schools have to work five times harder to get the same results as their counterparts at the high-income schools (if they are lucky).
For those of you who have never worked in a variety of schools, you would not believe the disparity in student abilities upon entering kindergarten. From that point, teachers are working like mad to make up the difference, and very few of these students will ever truly catch up, let alone excel. It is sad, and this is the reason you see an emphasis on “0-3” education. Hate to say it, but a child’s foundation (early years — nurturing and exposure to “academic” and general knowledge) is critical.
December 27, 2008 at 4:48 PM #321020CA renterParticipant[quote=afx114]I think we also need to challenge the idea that higher income schools equal better quality teachers. Some of the smartest people I know are teachers, and they chose to take a lower salary to teach in lower-income and less “prestigious” schools because of their desire to make a difference and help out those who are less fortunate. I know a lot of teachers, and all of them have chosen this route. I wonder if this is just my personal little anecdote, or whether it has legs beyond my circle of teacher friends.[/quote]
I’ve worked in both low-income and high-income schools and concur with your findings.
Higher scores usually have very little to do with the talent or drive of the individual teachers, and in my experience, the teachers in low-income schools have to work five times harder to get the same results as their counterparts at the high-income schools (if they are lucky).
For those of you who have never worked in a variety of schools, you would not believe the disparity in student abilities upon entering kindergarten. From that point, teachers are working like mad to make up the difference, and very few of these students will ever truly catch up, let alone excel. It is sad, and this is the reason you see an emphasis on “0-3” education. Hate to say it, but a child’s foundation (early years — nurturing and exposure to “academic” and general knowledge) is critical.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.