- This topic has 45 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 10, 2008 at 9:46 PM #302942November 11, 2008 at 2:07 PM #303232aldanteParticipant
Sd Realtor,
Thanks for the response and putting this in perspective. I guess what I meant by this post is not that the original leanders were bailed out. What I meant was the the new buyer obviously purchased this home with the sole purpose of flipping it for 12% in a one month period. Would they be willing to do that if this bailout had not materialized?? I doubt it. I was under the impression that if it did not work out they would be asking the bank for a bailout. I did not know that they put down that much. That makes it a pretty ballsy move or just a minor move for a really weathly person.
Thank you.November 11, 2008 at 2:07 PM #302785aldanteParticipantSd Realtor,
Thanks for the response and putting this in perspective. I guess what I meant by this post is not that the original leanders were bailed out. What I meant was the the new buyer obviously purchased this home with the sole purpose of flipping it for 12% in a one month period. Would they be willing to do that if this bailout had not materialized?? I doubt it. I was under the impression that if it did not work out they would be asking the bank for a bailout. I did not know that they put down that much. That makes it a pretty ballsy move or just a minor move for a really weathly person.
Thank you.November 11, 2008 at 2:07 PM #303149aldanteParticipantSd Realtor,
Thanks for the response and putting this in perspective. I guess what I meant by this post is not that the original leanders were bailed out. What I meant was the the new buyer obviously purchased this home with the sole purpose of flipping it for 12% in a one month period. Would they be willing to do that if this bailout had not materialized?? I doubt it. I was under the impression that if it did not work out they would be asking the bank for a bailout. I did not know that they put down that much. That makes it a pretty ballsy move or just a minor move for a really weathly person.
Thank you.November 11, 2008 at 2:07 PM #303158aldanteParticipantSd Realtor,
Thanks for the response and putting this in perspective. I guess what I meant by this post is not that the original leanders were bailed out. What I meant was the the new buyer obviously purchased this home with the sole purpose of flipping it for 12% in a one month period. Would they be willing to do that if this bailout had not materialized?? I doubt it. I was under the impression that if it did not work out they would be asking the bank for a bailout. I did not know that they put down that much. That makes it a pretty ballsy move or just a minor move for a really weathly person.
Thank you.November 11, 2008 at 2:07 PM #303175aldanteParticipantSd Realtor,
Thanks for the response and putting this in perspective. I guess what I meant by this post is not that the original leanders were bailed out. What I meant was the the new buyer obviously purchased this home with the sole purpose of flipping it for 12% in a one month period. Would they be willing to do that if this bailout had not materialized?? I doubt it. I was under the impression that if it did not work out they would be asking the bank for a bailout. I did not know that they put down that much. That makes it a pretty ballsy move or just a minor move for a really weathly person.
Thank you.November 11, 2008 at 2:28 PM #303252aldanteParticipantSD Realtor,
I do not understand why it is such a stretch. The banks are working on loan modifications based on this bailout….part of the package is to reduce the principle amount.The program’s goal is to reduce monthly payments – including taxes and association fees – to 38% of homeowners’ gross income via a combination of:
Lower mortgage rates.
Reduced principal amount.
Extended term (or duration) of loans
Some combination of the above.So you pay 535k for a property try to sell for 598k 1 month later and if some sucker does not buy your property uncle sam will. I guess that is what I mean.
Thanks
November 11, 2008 at 2:28 PM #303195aldanteParticipantSD Realtor,
I do not understand why it is such a stretch. The banks are working on loan modifications based on this bailout….part of the package is to reduce the principle amount.The program’s goal is to reduce monthly payments – including taxes and association fees – to 38% of homeowners’ gross income via a combination of:
Lower mortgage rates.
Reduced principal amount.
Extended term (or duration) of loans
Some combination of the above.So you pay 535k for a property try to sell for 598k 1 month later and if some sucker does not buy your property uncle sam will. I guess that is what I mean.
Thanks
November 11, 2008 at 2:28 PM #303178aldanteParticipantSD Realtor,
I do not understand why it is such a stretch. The banks are working on loan modifications based on this bailout….part of the package is to reduce the principle amount.The program’s goal is to reduce monthly payments – including taxes and association fees – to 38% of homeowners’ gross income via a combination of:
Lower mortgage rates.
Reduced principal amount.
Extended term (or duration) of loans
Some combination of the above.So you pay 535k for a property try to sell for 598k 1 month later and if some sucker does not buy your property uncle sam will. I guess that is what I mean.
Thanks
November 11, 2008 at 2:28 PM #303169aldanteParticipantSD Realtor,
I do not understand why it is such a stretch. The banks are working on loan modifications based on this bailout….part of the package is to reduce the principle amount.The program’s goal is to reduce monthly payments – including taxes and association fees – to 38% of homeowners’ gross income via a combination of:
Lower mortgage rates.
Reduced principal amount.
Extended term (or duration) of loans
Some combination of the above.So you pay 535k for a property try to sell for 598k 1 month later and if some sucker does not buy your property uncle sam will. I guess that is what I mean.
Thanks
November 11, 2008 at 2:28 PM #302805aldanteParticipantSD Realtor,
I do not understand why it is such a stretch. The banks are working on loan modifications based on this bailout….part of the package is to reduce the principle amount.The program’s goal is to reduce monthly payments – including taxes and association fees – to 38% of homeowners’ gross income via a combination of:
Lower mortgage rates.
Reduced principal amount.
Extended term (or duration) of loans
Some combination of the above.So you pay 535k for a property try to sell for 598k 1 month later and if some sucker does not buy your property uncle sam will. I guess that is what I mean.
Thanks
November 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM #303203boomerParticipantGetting mad or jealous that someone might make 12% in one month is just a waste of time. If they bought at the TS, they paid all cash. People buying at the TS provide a valuable service. They are more likely to fix anything wrong with the house and put it back on the market at a reasonable price. This aids in getting the market down to the levels most of would like to see. Buying this at 535K and trying to sell at 598K is not however a spread I would feel comfortable with. Remember you have closing costs in there.
It cracks me up how pissed off people get when they think someone else might make a quick buck. It was not the “flippers” that caused this bubble. There is risk in every one of these deals. Lets see how this one plays out… I’ll bet not well.
November 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM #303220boomerParticipantGetting mad or jealous that someone might make 12% in one month is just a waste of time. If they bought at the TS, they paid all cash. People buying at the TS provide a valuable service. They are more likely to fix anything wrong with the house and put it back on the market at a reasonable price. This aids in getting the market down to the levels most of would like to see. Buying this at 535K and trying to sell at 598K is not however a spread I would feel comfortable with. Remember you have closing costs in there.
It cracks me up how pissed off people get when they think someone else might make a quick buck. It was not the “flippers” that caused this bubble. There is risk in every one of these deals. Lets see how this one plays out… I’ll bet not well.
November 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM #302830boomerParticipantGetting mad or jealous that someone might make 12% in one month is just a waste of time. If they bought at the TS, they paid all cash. People buying at the TS provide a valuable service. They are more likely to fix anything wrong with the house and put it back on the market at a reasonable price. This aids in getting the market down to the levels most of would like to see. Buying this at 535K and trying to sell at 598K is not however a spread I would feel comfortable with. Remember you have closing costs in there.
It cracks me up how pissed off people get when they think someone else might make a quick buck. It was not the “flippers” that caused this bubble. There is risk in every one of these deals. Lets see how this one plays out… I’ll bet not well.
November 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM #303277boomerParticipantGetting mad or jealous that someone might make 12% in one month is just a waste of time. If they bought at the TS, they paid all cash. People buying at the TS provide a valuable service. They are more likely to fix anything wrong with the house and put it back on the market at a reasonable price. This aids in getting the market down to the levels most of would like to see. Buying this at 535K and trying to sell at 598K is not however a spread I would feel comfortable with. Remember you have closing costs in there.
It cracks me up how pissed off people get when they think someone else might make a quick buck. It was not the “flippers” that caused this bubble. There is risk in every one of these deals. Lets see how this one plays out… I’ll bet not well.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.