- This topic has 332 replies, 37 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by Veritas.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 4, 2008 at 1:29 PM #216819June 4, 2008 at 1:29 PM #216846AnonymousGuest
zk, ditto. I sure would like to know how Obama could be considered a Marxist and Racist. What a ridiculous accusation.
June 4, 2008 at 1:29 PM #216871AnonymousGuestzk, ditto. I sure would like to know how Obama could be considered a Marxist and Racist. What a ridiculous accusation.
June 4, 2008 at 1:42 PM #216719zkParticipantObama went on to say that if he became our President he planned to have a civil rights police force policing the streets. This isn’t a joke, I just happened to be running through my channels a few months ago and saw this interview.
That’s just plain made up.
I will be honest I still think we have a long way to go in that country, but I do believe we are moving in the right direction.
So you think that the Iraqis are taking responsibility for their country and making significant progress in the process of running and securing it by themselves? Or do you have some other “right direction” in mind?
We need to get off the Iraq wagon and start focusing on what directly affects our country like North Korea and Iran and of course this global economic meltdown that we face. I haven’t heard much about either country as of late because it seems as though Obama and Hilary want to focus on the past and not the future.
I wouldn’t call focusing on Iraq focusing on the past. I’d call it focusing on the present and the future. Americans are dying in Iraq and a lot of attention should therefore be paid to Iraq.
Don’t vote for Obama because you think he is a great speaker or he is going to change the country because it won’t happen. Vote for Obama if you really feel like he motives are there. I believe Obama is a talented speaker and extremely savy salesman, but he doesn’t belong in the Oval Office IMHO.
Well, except for the part about whehter he belongs in the Oval Office and whether he’s going to change things, I agree with you.
June 4, 2008 at 1:42 PM #216803zkParticipantObama went on to say that if he became our President he planned to have a civil rights police force policing the streets. This isn’t a joke, I just happened to be running through my channels a few months ago and saw this interview.
That’s just plain made up.
I will be honest I still think we have a long way to go in that country, but I do believe we are moving in the right direction.
So you think that the Iraqis are taking responsibility for their country and making significant progress in the process of running and securing it by themselves? Or do you have some other “right direction” in mind?
We need to get off the Iraq wagon and start focusing on what directly affects our country like North Korea and Iran and of course this global economic meltdown that we face. I haven’t heard much about either country as of late because it seems as though Obama and Hilary want to focus on the past and not the future.
I wouldn’t call focusing on Iraq focusing on the past. I’d call it focusing on the present and the future. Americans are dying in Iraq and a lot of attention should therefore be paid to Iraq.
Don’t vote for Obama because you think he is a great speaker or he is going to change the country because it won’t happen. Vote for Obama if you really feel like he motives are there. I believe Obama is a talented speaker and extremely savy salesman, but he doesn’t belong in the Oval Office IMHO.
Well, except for the part about whehter he belongs in the Oval Office and whether he’s going to change things, I agree with you.
June 4, 2008 at 1:42 PM #216829zkParticipantObama went on to say that if he became our President he planned to have a civil rights police force policing the streets. This isn’t a joke, I just happened to be running through my channels a few months ago and saw this interview.
That’s just plain made up.
I will be honest I still think we have a long way to go in that country, but I do believe we are moving in the right direction.
So you think that the Iraqis are taking responsibility for their country and making significant progress in the process of running and securing it by themselves? Or do you have some other “right direction” in mind?
We need to get off the Iraq wagon and start focusing on what directly affects our country like North Korea and Iran and of course this global economic meltdown that we face. I haven’t heard much about either country as of late because it seems as though Obama and Hilary want to focus on the past and not the future.
I wouldn’t call focusing on Iraq focusing on the past. I’d call it focusing on the present and the future. Americans are dying in Iraq and a lot of attention should therefore be paid to Iraq.
Don’t vote for Obama because you think he is a great speaker or he is going to change the country because it won’t happen. Vote for Obama if you really feel like he motives are there. I believe Obama is a talented speaker and extremely savy salesman, but he doesn’t belong in the Oval Office IMHO.
Well, except for the part about whehter he belongs in the Oval Office and whether he’s going to change things, I agree with you.
June 4, 2008 at 1:42 PM #216856zkParticipantObama went on to say that if he became our President he planned to have a civil rights police force policing the streets. This isn’t a joke, I just happened to be running through my channels a few months ago and saw this interview.
That’s just plain made up.
I will be honest I still think we have a long way to go in that country, but I do believe we are moving in the right direction.
So you think that the Iraqis are taking responsibility for their country and making significant progress in the process of running and securing it by themselves? Or do you have some other “right direction” in mind?
We need to get off the Iraq wagon and start focusing on what directly affects our country like North Korea and Iran and of course this global economic meltdown that we face. I haven’t heard much about either country as of late because it seems as though Obama and Hilary want to focus on the past and not the future.
I wouldn’t call focusing on Iraq focusing on the past. I’d call it focusing on the present and the future. Americans are dying in Iraq and a lot of attention should therefore be paid to Iraq.
Don’t vote for Obama because you think he is a great speaker or he is going to change the country because it won’t happen. Vote for Obama if you really feel like he motives are there. I believe Obama is a talented speaker and extremely savy salesman, but he doesn’t belong in the Oval Office IMHO.
Well, except for the part about whehter he belongs in the Oval Office and whether he’s going to change things, I agree with you.
June 4, 2008 at 1:42 PM #216881zkParticipantObama went on to say that if he became our President he planned to have a civil rights police force policing the streets. This isn’t a joke, I just happened to be running through my channels a few months ago and saw this interview.
That’s just plain made up.
I will be honest I still think we have a long way to go in that country, but I do believe we are moving in the right direction.
So you think that the Iraqis are taking responsibility for their country and making significant progress in the process of running and securing it by themselves? Or do you have some other “right direction” in mind?
We need to get off the Iraq wagon and start focusing on what directly affects our country like North Korea and Iran and of course this global economic meltdown that we face. I haven’t heard much about either country as of late because it seems as though Obama and Hilary want to focus on the past and not the future.
I wouldn’t call focusing on Iraq focusing on the past. I’d call it focusing on the present and the future. Americans are dying in Iraq and a lot of attention should therefore be paid to Iraq.
Don’t vote for Obama because you think he is a great speaker or he is going to change the country because it won’t happen. Vote for Obama if you really feel like he motives are there. I believe Obama is a talented speaker and extremely savy salesman, but he doesn’t belong in the Oval Office IMHO.
Well, except for the part about whehter he belongs in the Oval Office and whether he’s going to change things, I agree with you.
June 4, 2008 at 2:01 PM #216748CascaParticipantFor all of you who have more sense, than to roll in the mud with the witless harridan, I will shoulder the task.
Marion, since almost everything you have to say on this site has at least a passing relationship with the ridiculous, one must suspect an inability on your part to recognize it in any form. Perhaps the story of the “Che flag” in Obama’s Houston headquarters escaped your notice? Should you require more evidence of Obama, Marxism, and his whackdoodle nutjob supporters, you might try googling “Obama Marxist”, and give a read to a bit of the torrent that appears.
Of course, you’ll feel at home and justified by what you find. They all feel that someone else should pick up the tab for their idiotic wandering in this life, just as you feel glee each time you cash one of your ex’s support checks. At least he has the satisfaction of having rid himself of you. The taxpayer is saddled with the government tit-suckers of this society without such compensation.
June 4, 2008 at 2:01 PM #216833CascaParticipantFor all of you who have more sense, than to roll in the mud with the witless harridan, I will shoulder the task.
Marion, since almost everything you have to say on this site has at least a passing relationship with the ridiculous, one must suspect an inability on your part to recognize it in any form. Perhaps the story of the “Che flag” in Obama’s Houston headquarters escaped your notice? Should you require more evidence of Obama, Marxism, and his whackdoodle nutjob supporters, you might try googling “Obama Marxist”, and give a read to a bit of the torrent that appears.
Of course, you’ll feel at home and justified by what you find. They all feel that someone else should pick up the tab for their idiotic wandering in this life, just as you feel glee each time you cash one of your ex’s support checks. At least he has the satisfaction of having rid himself of you. The taxpayer is saddled with the government tit-suckers of this society without such compensation.
June 4, 2008 at 2:01 PM #216859CascaParticipantFor all of you who have more sense, than to roll in the mud with the witless harridan, I will shoulder the task.
Marion, since almost everything you have to say on this site has at least a passing relationship with the ridiculous, one must suspect an inability on your part to recognize it in any form. Perhaps the story of the “Che flag” in Obama’s Houston headquarters escaped your notice? Should you require more evidence of Obama, Marxism, and his whackdoodle nutjob supporters, you might try googling “Obama Marxist”, and give a read to a bit of the torrent that appears.
Of course, you’ll feel at home and justified by what you find. They all feel that someone else should pick up the tab for their idiotic wandering in this life, just as you feel glee each time you cash one of your ex’s support checks. At least he has the satisfaction of having rid himself of you. The taxpayer is saddled with the government tit-suckers of this society without such compensation.
June 4, 2008 at 2:01 PM #216887CascaParticipantFor all of you who have more sense, than to roll in the mud with the witless harridan, I will shoulder the task.
Marion, since almost everything you have to say on this site has at least a passing relationship with the ridiculous, one must suspect an inability on your part to recognize it in any form. Perhaps the story of the “Che flag” in Obama’s Houston headquarters escaped your notice? Should you require more evidence of Obama, Marxism, and his whackdoodle nutjob supporters, you might try googling “Obama Marxist”, and give a read to a bit of the torrent that appears.
Of course, you’ll feel at home and justified by what you find. They all feel that someone else should pick up the tab for their idiotic wandering in this life, just as you feel glee each time you cash one of your ex’s support checks. At least he has the satisfaction of having rid himself of you. The taxpayer is saddled with the government tit-suckers of this society without such compensation.
June 4, 2008 at 2:01 PM #216910CascaParticipantFor all of you who have more sense, than to roll in the mud with the witless harridan, I will shoulder the task.
Marion, since almost everything you have to say on this site has at least a passing relationship with the ridiculous, one must suspect an inability on your part to recognize it in any form. Perhaps the story of the “Che flag” in Obama’s Houston headquarters escaped your notice? Should you require more evidence of Obama, Marxism, and his whackdoodle nutjob supporters, you might try googling “Obama Marxist”, and give a read to a bit of the torrent that appears.
Of course, you’ll feel at home and justified by what you find. They all feel that someone else should pick up the tab for their idiotic wandering in this life, just as you feel glee each time you cash one of your ex’s support checks. At least he has the satisfaction of having rid himself of you. The taxpayer is saddled with the government tit-suckers of this society without such compensation.
June 4, 2008 at 2:14 PM #216753DukehornParticipantSo Casca,
Are these “tit-suckers” all these high tech 6 figure types with graduate degrees that keep our economy barely above water ,or are they the defense industry contractors that get paid out for low-bid contracts that they never fulfill.
Don’t let logic cloud your bigot speech.
I’d rather be a whackdoodle than an obese white bigot who’s notion of fine dining is Applebee’s and who believes that dinosaurs frolicked with the humans a few hundred years ago.
Dang, doesn’t steroetyping suck, but go ahead, your ancestors probably sucked off the teat of a T-Rex in your mind.
June 4, 2008 at 2:14 PM #216838DukehornParticipantSo Casca,
Are these “tit-suckers” all these high tech 6 figure types with graduate degrees that keep our economy barely above water ,or are they the defense industry contractors that get paid out for low-bid contracts that they never fulfill.
Don’t let logic cloud your bigot speech.
I’d rather be a whackdoodle than an obese white bigot who’s notion of fine dining is Applebee’s and who believes that dinosaurs frolicked with the humans a few hundred years ago.
Dang, doesn’t steroetyping suck, but go ahead, your ancestors probably sucked off the teat of a T-Rex in your mind.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.