- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by jficquette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 11, 2008 at 11:56 AM #256005August 11, 2008 at 3:11 PM #255791EconProfParticipant
DWCAP, your last sentence really said it all. Prices are really just the result of supply and demand. Rich foreigners could scoop up a bundle of CA houses, but then they either have to rent them or sell them, to……Californians! They either supply them to the rental market, thus lowering rents, or supply them to the for sale market, thus not changing supply in the long run.
Neither move looks financially feasible, so the rumor of big foreign money moving in is probably a new urban myth.August 11, 2008 at 3:11 PM #255969EconProfParticipantDWCAP, your last sentence really said it all. Prices are really just the result of supply and demand. Rich foreigners could scoop up a bundle of CA houses, but then they either have to rent them or sell them, to……Californians! They either supply them to the rental market, thus lowering rents, or supply them to the for sale market, thus not changing supply in the long run.
Neither move looks financially feasible, so the rumor of big foreign money moving in is probably a new urban myth.August 11, 2008 at 3:11 PM #255973EconProfParticipantDWCAP, your last sentence really said it all. Prices are really just the result of supply and demand. Rich foreigners could scoop up a bundle of CA houses, but then they either have to rent them or sell them, to……Californians! They either supply them to the rental market, thus lowering rents, or supply them to the for sale market, thus not changing supply in the long run.
Neither move looks financially feasible, so the rumor of big foreign money moving in is probably a new urban myth.August 11, 2008 at 3:11 PM #256081EconProfParticipantDWCAP, your last sentence really said it all. Prices are really just the result of supply and demand. Rich foreigners could scoop up a bundle of CA houses, but then they either have to rent them or sell them, to……Californians! They either supply them to the rental market, thus lowering rents, or supply them to the for sale market, thus not changing supply in the long run.
Neither move looks financially feasible, so the rumor of big foreign money moving in is probably a new urban myth.August 11, 2008 at 3:11 PM #256033EconProfParticipantDWCAP, your last sentence really said it all. Prices are really just the result of supply and demand. Rich foreigners could scoop up a bundle of CA houses, but then they either have to rent them or sell them, to……Californians! They either supply them to the rental market, thus lowering rents, or supply them to the for sale market, thus not changing supply in the long run.
Neither move looks financially feasible, so the rumor of big foreign money moving in is probably a new urban myth.August 11, 2008 at 3:20 PM #255796peterbParticipantA famous japanese business tycoon bought a huge number of SFR’s in Santa Rosa, CA in early 1990’s. It didnt make a difference in the market. He rented them until about 2001 and then started to sell them off. But this was after the market had recovered on its own. He had intentionally kept the rents way below market price. So when he went to sell them, the tenants flipped out and got the local govt involved to stop him. Pathetic.
August 11, 2008 at 3:20 PM #256086peterbParticipantA famous japanese business tycoon bought a huge number of SFR’s in Santa Rosa, CA in early 1990’s. It didnt make a difference in the market. He rented them until about 2001 and then started to sell them off. But this was after the market had recovered on its own. He had intentionally kept the rents way below market price. So when he went to sell them, the tenants flipped out and got the local govt involved to stop him. Pathetic.
August 11, 2008 at 3:20 PM #256038peterbParticipantA famous japanese business tycoon bought a huge number of SFR’s in Santa Rosa, CA in early 1990’s. It didnt make a difference in the market. He rented them until about 2001 and then started to sell them off. But this was after the market had recovered on its own. He had intentionally kept the rents way below market price. So when he went to sell them, the tenants flipped out and got the local govt involved to stop him. Pathetic.
August 11, 2008 at 3:20 PM #255978peterbParticipantA famous japanese business tycoon bought a huge number of SFR’s in Santa Rosa, CA in early 1990’s. It didnt make a difference in the market. He rented them until about 2001 and then started to sell them off. But this was after the market had recovered on its own. He had intentionally kept the rents way below market price. So when he went to sell them, the tenants flipped out and got the local govt involved to stop him. Pathetic.
August 11, 2008 at 3:20 PM #255974peterbParticipantA famous japanese business tycoon bought a huge number of SFR’s in Santa Rosa, CA in early 1990’s. It didnt make a difference in the market. He rented them until about 2001 and then started to sell them off. But this was after the market had recovered on its own. He had intentionally kept the rents way below market price. So when he went to sell them, the tenants flipped out and got the local govt involved to stop him. Pathetic.
August 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM #255983jficquetteParticipantIf they can buy median priced houses at 30 cents on the dollar they could rent those and be cash flow positive.
Perhaps the angle is to buy a bunch of cheap houses rent them and in 10 years have the houses double in value.
This would means setting up a huge property managment organziation but no barriers to that.
John
August 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM #255979jficquetteParticipantIf they can buy median priced houses at 30 cents on the dollar they could rent those and be cash flow positive.
Perhaps the angle is to buy a bunch of cheap houses rent them and in 10 years have the houses double in value.
This would means setting up a huge property managment organziation but no barriers to that.
John
August 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM #256043jficquetteParticipantIf they can buy median priced houses at 30 cents on the dollar they could rent those and be cash flow positive.
Perhaps the angle is to buy a bunch of cheap houses rent them and in 10 years have the houses double in value.
This would means setting up a huge property managment organziation but no barriers to that.
John
August 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM #255801jficquetteParticipantIf they can buy median priced houses at 30 cents on the dollar they could rent those and be cash flow positive.
Perhaps the angle is to buy a bunch of cheap houses rent them and in 10 years have the houses double in value.
This would means setting up a huge property managment organziation but no barriers to that.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.