Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › $7 gasoline in the near future???
- This topic has 475 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by donaldduckmoore.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 5, 2008 at 10:13 AM #233525July 5, 2008 at 12:16 PM #233400xironmanParticipant
Geology will regulate carbon emissions just fine.
Not entirely true. One mitigating technology we will use will probably be CTL, as mentioned in Hirsh, probably without CO2 sequestration. Though the coal supply itself is both geologically and logistically limited, this does not mean that we won’t make every effort to pull as much of it as possible, liquefy it and dump the emissions into the air. Far higher impact than the remaining oil.
July 5, 2008 at 12:16 PM #233529xironmanParticipantGeology will regulate carbon emissions just fine.
Not entirely true. One mitigating technology we will use will probably be CTL, as mentioned in Hirsh, probably without CO2 sequestration. Though the coal supply itself is both geologically and logistically limited, this does not mean that we won’t make every effort to pull as much of it as possible, liquefy it and dump the emissions into the air. Far higher impact than the remaining oil.
July 5, 2008 at 12:16 PM #233537xironmanParticipantGeology will regulate carbon emissions just fine.
Not entirely true. One mitigating technology we will use will probably be CTL, as mentioned in Hirsh, probably without CO2 sequestration. Though the coal supply itself is both geologically and logistically limited, this does not mean that we won’t make every effort to pull as much of it as possible, liquefy it and dump the emissions into the air. Far higher impact than the remaining oil.
July 5, 2008 at 12:16 PM #233579xironmanParticipantGeology will regulate carbon emissions just fine.
Not entirely true. One mitigating technology we will use will probably be CTL, as mentioned in Hirsh, probably without CO2 sequestration. Though the coal supply itself is both geologically and logistically limited, this does not mean that we won’t make every effort to pull as much of it as possible, liquefy it and dump the emissions into the air. Far higher impact than the remaining oil.
July 5, 2008 at 12:16 PM #233591xironmanParticipantGeology will regulate carbon emissions just fine.
Not entirely true. One mitigating technology we will use will probably be CTL, as mentioned in Hirsh, probably without CO2 sequestration. Though the coal supply itself is both geologically and logistically limited, this does not mean that we won’t make every effort to pull as much of it as possible, liquefy it and dump the emissions into the air. Far higher impact than the remaining oil.
July 5, 2008 at 3:29 PM #233453no_such_realityParticipant“I’ve got a groundbreaking, earthshattering tip to save on fuel costs. Drive less. ”
FLU, it’s even easier than that. Don’t stomp the gas and slam the breaks. Actually, you already said that when you said ‘drive like a pansey’.
Simply paying attention to the traffic ahead and easing off the gas instead of braking and accelerating moderately will give you 20-30% improvement compared to typical CA drving. And BTW, we’re probably on the same side here.
With high fuel prices, there are no winners. High fuel drives costs for lots of things and even if one piddles around in a smug cloud producing Prius, at $7/gal, the fuel prices are going to bust them in the rest of the economy.
My complaint wasn’t directed at you but was instead directed at the specious claims of a need to change. High fuel costs because of global consumption will drive change, but I call baloney on the change being needed for some overall good whether it’s the poser’s concept of egalatarianism, global warming or other junk.
Now if you all will excuse me, I have a strip mining venture to attend to that is making bank from the spike in battery component metals. Okay, I don’t, but face it, elsewhere in the world, they are going balls out, screw the environment, to get the metals and other stuff, our new ‘green’ selves want.
July 5, 2008 at 3:29 PM #233580no_such_realityParticipant“I’ve got a groundbreaking, earthshattering tip to save on fuel costs. Drive less. ”
FLU, it’s even easier than that. Don’t stomp the gas and slam the breaks. Actually, you already said that when you said ‘drive like a pansey’.
Simply paying attention to the traffic ahead and easing off the gas instead of braking and accelerating moderately will give you 20-30% improvement compared to typical CA drving. And BTW, we’re probably on the same side here.
With high fuel prices, there are no winners. High fuel drives costs for lots of things and even if one piddles around in a smug cloud producing Prius, at $7/gal, the fuel prices are going to bust them in the rest of the economy.
My complaint wasn’t directed at you but was instead directed at the specious claims of a need to change. High fuel costs because of global consumption will drive change, but I call baloney on the change being needed for some overall good whether it’s the poser’s concept of egalatarianism, global warming or other junk.
Now if you all will excuse me, I have a strip mining venture to attend to that is making bank from the spike in battery component metals. Okay, I don’t, but face it, elsewhere in the world, they are going balls out, screw the environment, to get the metals and other stuff, our new ‘green’ selves want.
July 5, 2008 at 3:29 PM #233587no_such_realityParticipant“I’ve got a groundbreaking, earthshattering tip to save on fuel costs. Drive less. ”
FLU, it’s even easier than that. Don’t stomp the gas and slam the breaks. Actually, you already said that when you said ‘drive like a pansey’.
Simply paying attention to the traffic ahead and easing off the gas instead of braking and accelerating moderately will give you 20-30% improvement compared to typical CA drving. And BTW, we’re probably on the same side here.
With high fuel prices, there are no winners. High fuel drives costs for lots of things and even if one piddles around in a smug cloud producing Prius, at $7/gal, the fuel prices are going to bust them in the rest of the economy.
My complaint wasn’t directed at you but was instead directed at the specious claims of a need to change. High fuel costs because of global consumption will drive change, but I call baloney on the change being needed for some overall good whether it’s the poser’s concept of egalatarianism, global warming or other junk.
Now if you all will excuse me, I have a strip mining venture to attend to that is making bank from the spike in battery component metals. Okay, I don’t, but face it, elsewhere in the world, they are going balls out, screw the environment, to get the metals and other stuff, our new ‘green’ selves want.
July 5, 2008 at 3:29 PM #233630no_such_realityParticipant“I’ve got a groundbreaking, earthshattering tip to save on fuel costs. Drive less. ”
FLU, it’s even easier than that. Don’t stomp the gas and slam the breaks. Actually, you already said that when you said ‘drive like a pansey’.
Simply paying attention to the traffic ahead and easing off the gas instead of braking and accelerating moderately will give you 20-30% improvement compared to typical CA drving. And BTW, we’re probably on the same side here.
With high fuel prices, there are no winners. High fuel drives costs for lots of things and even if one piddles around in a smug cloud producing Prius, at $7/gal, the fuel prices are going to bust them in the rest of the economy.
My complaint wasn’t directed at you but was instead directed at the specious claims of a need to change. High fuel costs because of global consumption will drive change, but I call baloney on the change being needed for some overall good whether it’s the poser’s concept of egalatarianism, global warming or other junk.
Now if you all will excuse me, I have a strip mining venture to attend to that is making bank from the spike in battery component metals. Okay, I don’t, but face it, elsewhere in the world, they are going balls out, screw the environment, to get the metals and other stuff, our new ‘green’ selves want.
July 5, 2008 at 3:29 PM #233641no_such_realityParticipant“I’ve got a groundbreaking, earthshattering tip to save on fuel costs. Drive less. ”
FLU, it’s even easier than that. Don’t stomp the gas and slam the breaks. Actually, you already said that when you said ‘drive like a pansey’.
Simply paying attention to the traffic ahead and easing off the gas instead of braking and accelerating moderately will give you 20-30% improvement compared to typical CA drving. And BTW, we’re probably on the same side here.
With high fuel prices, there are no winners. High fuel drives costs for lots of things and even if one piddles around in a smug cloud producing Prius, at $7/gal, the fuel prices are going to bust them in the rest of the economy.
My complaint wasn’t directed at you but was instead directed at the specious claims of a need to change. High fuel costs because of global consumption will drive change, but I call baloney on the change being needed for some overall good whether it’s the poser’s concept of egalatarianism, global warming or other junk.
Now if you all will excuse me, I have a strip mining venture to attend to that is making bank from the spike in battery component metals. Okay, I don’t, but face it, elsewhere in the world, they are going balls out, screw the environment, to get the metals and other stuff, our new ‘green’ selves want.
July 5, 2008 at 4:58 PM #233488TheBreezeParticipant[quote=no_such_reality]
My complaint wasn’t directed at you but was instead directed at the specious claims of a need to change. High fuel costs because of global consumption will drive change, but I call baloney on the change being needed for some overall good whether it’s the poser’s concept of egalatarianism, global warming or other junk.
[/quote]
You’re right. There is an infinite supply of oil. No need to change.
By the way, I hear that Beijing doesn’t have any environmental regulations. Look like a nice place to live, no?
[img_assist|nid=8131|title=A nice day in Beijing|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=450|height=315]
July 5, 2008 at 4:58 PM #233615TheBreezeParticipant[quote=no_such_reality]
My complaint wasn’t directed at you but was instead directed at the specious claims of a need to change. High fuel costs because of global consumption will drive change, but I call baloney on the change being needed for some overall good whether it’s the poser’s concept of egalatarianism, global warming or other junk.
[/quote]
You’re right. There is an infinite supply of oil. No need to change.
By the way, I hear that Beijing doesn’t have any environmental regulations. Look like a nice place to live, no?
[img_assist|nid=8131|title=A nice day in Beijing|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=450|height=315]
July 5, 2008 at 4:58 PM #233623TheBreezeParticipant[quote=no_such_reality]
My complaint wasn’t directed at you but was instead directed at the specious claims of a need to change. High fuel costs because of global consumption will drive change, but I call baloney on the change being needed for some overall good whether it’s the poser’s concept of egalatarianism, global warming or other junk.
[/quote]
You’re right. There is an infinite supply of oil. No need to change.
By the way, I hear that Beijing doesn’t have any environmental regulations. Look like a nice place to live, no?
[img_assist|nid=8131|title=A nice day in Beijing|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=450|height=315]
July 5, 2008 at 4:58 PM #233665TheBreezeParticipant[quote=no_such_reality]
My complaint wasn’t directed at you but was instead directed at the specious claims of a need to change. High fuel costs because of global consumption will drive change, but I call baloney on the change being needed for some overall good whether it’s the poser’s concept of egalatarianism, global warming or other junk.
[/quote]
You’re right. There is an infinite supply of oil. No need to change.
By the way, I hear that Beijing doesn’t have any environmental regulations. Look like a nice place to live, no?
[img_assist|nid=8131|title=A nice day in Beijing|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=450|height=315]
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.