- This topic has 12 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 8 months ago by synchro.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2007 at 1:29 PM #8480February 27, 2007 at 1:48 PM #46392AnonymousGuest
On Zillow, the property tax is listed as being only $425/yr. Whoever owns this has owned it for a loooooooong time.
February 27, 2007 at 1:57 PM #46395WickedheartParticipant“So why, the $640,000 asking price?”
Beats me, California Dreamin’, magical thinking or maybe too many long hits on the bong. Looks like they are a long time owner too judging by the whoppping $425 dollars they paid in property taxes last year.
February 27, 2007 at 2:00 PM #46397SD AttorneyParticipantWhat do you think a fair offer would be?
February 27, 2007 at 2:31 PM #46404SD RealtorParticipantFair is in the eye of the beholder….
The facts are it started at 700k. It is now at 600-640k. The mortgage recording history is a 220k mortgage in 1990 and another 64k in 2004. I guess you could run a comp analysis to see where it falls in the solds comps.
Personally I wouldn’t touch it unless I could get it to pencil out as a rental regardless of what the comps were.
One could SD Realtor
February 27, 2007 at 2:49 PM #46405SD AttorneyParticipantThanks SD Realtor,
Your comments are always insightful.
I haven’t done any type of mathematical analysis on this property, but I could sleep at night if I bought this property for $350,000.
That seems reasonable to me considering the neighborhood, condition/age of the house, and the way the market is heading.
If that house was in Minnesota, I would make an offer of $130,000 to $150,000. Based on that logic, is the premium to live in San Diego $500,000 (since the listed price is $640,000)??
From a lay person’s prospective, it seems like a big deal to me that the house is currently empty, and has been for some time. Obviously, someone is carrying the property, but they don’t have the luxury to take it off the market and continue to live in it while they wait for better times.
February 27, 2007 at 3:45 PM #46413drunkleParticipant$400/year in property tax? the owner can afford to sit on it. return to rental use. use it as a dog house, whatever.
modification to prop 13: only applies to primary residence. would that shake things up…
February 27, 2007 at 5:32 PM #46428DCRogersParticipantIt’s a big house for the neighborhood… almost 2000SF, where the typical house has about half that. That drives up the $/SF calculations in this area.
However, I think this person got over-inspired. North of Adams, perhaps, where larger homes are at a premium, but this neighborhood is best described as “transitional”… OK if people think the transition is going their way, but in these troubled times, they may think it’s as likely to stay the same quality or even devolve, so I think they’ll have to wait for someone willing to pay for the extra space.
February 28, 2007 at 8:07 PM #46583sdcellarParticipant500 of those square feet appear to be in a craptastic add-on family room… It was still a good size before this was added, but the net effect actually lowers value in my (and I would think most people’s) opinion.
March 1, 2007 at 5:01 AM #46595synchroParticipantI think the house is worth $38,585. Add another $38 for San Diego location premium. Subtract $5 for collective delusion.
Start with a stink bid of $800.
March 1, 2007 at 5:02 AM #46596synchroParticipantI think the house is worth $38,585. Add another $38 for San Diego location premium. Subtract $5 for collective delusion.
Start with a stink bid of $800.
March 1, 2007 at 5:02 AM #46597synchroParticipantI think the house is worth $38,585. Add another $38 for San Diego location premium. Subtract $5 for collective delusion.
Start with a stink bid of $800.
March 1, 2007 at 5:03 AM #46598synchroParticipantI think the house is worth $38,585. Add another $38 for San Diego location premium. Subtract $5 for collective delusion.
Start with a stink bid of $800.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.