What makes you believe that Obama hasn’t furnished his Hawaii birth certificate? And what makes you believe that the guy on that website you cite has painstakingly researched the matter (and is telling you the truth)? It seems to me that the only way you could believe either of those things is if you take what is being said at face value without doing any research of your own. That’s pretty much the definition of unskeptical.
And that all-too-common lack of skepticism is what I mean to illustrate. So many Americans (so many humans, really) lack the skepticism necessary to deal with the flood of “information” that the internet brings.
Every time I say that you believe everything you read on the internet, you counter with something untrue (and easily disprovable) that you read on the internet. So this discussion is really bearing no further fruit. You’ve pretty much admitted that you’re unskeptical, but you don’t see it as a problem. I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree on that. [/quote]
He has not furnished an original birth certificate. The one he posted on his web site was proven to be a forgey.
That is what my point has been all along. If you want to believe that he has provided an original or certified original birth certificate then we can’t agree on the facts of the matter so we will never agree in conversation.
