- This topic has 4 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 13, 2007 at 9:23 PM #8838April 15, 2007 at 8:43 AM #50142CAwiremanParticipant
wantobuy,
If working people can’t affort payments (esp after ARM resets) then having a job doesn’t do enough good.
But the point you bring up is a good one. Its just that adjustable rates play a much bigger role this time around than last. And, the adjustments can easily shift someone out of being able to pay the monthly mortgage, whether employed or not.
From the article:
“Unlike people who purchased a home several years ago, those who bought in 2006 have little equity, if any, and may even be saddled with negative equity if the value of their home has fallen below the purchase price. Those homeowners won’t be able to refinance as teaser rates rise over the next couple of years.”
“The nonprofit Center for Responsible Lending predicts the subprime failure rate for loans written in 2006 will reach 22.8% in Santa Ana, Anaheim and Irvine; 22% in Los Angeles, Long Beach and Glendale; and 24.2% in Bakersfield.”
“February foreclosure data from RealtyTrac shows California filings soaring. Former boom states Nevada and Florida are No. 1 and No. 3 for foreclosure rates.”
“I fully anticipate that we’ll see a higher delinquency and foreclosure rate in California this year and into next,” Zandi said. “If the job market started to weaken (in California) it would be a complete mess.”
Even for the working, ARM adjustments may be brutal.
(Formerly known as cawireman)
April 15, 2007 at 12:04 PM #50149greekfireParticipantI don’t necessarily agree with the article, either. I think the article pointed to increased foreclosures in places like Ohio due to their higher unemployment rate…which was a whopping 0.2% higher than California’s 4.8%. Like HiggyBaby said, what good does it do to have a job if you still can’t afford to make the payments?
Employment (more so the psychology of high employment) IMHO, is going to be the straw that breaks the camel’s back in this inflated market. I predict that there will be an inevitable hiccup with employment at some point in the next 12-18 months and it will expedite the housing crash. Who knows.
April 15, 2007 at 10:32 PM #50180forsale_2007ParticipantImho….I think there’s some truth to that article.
But here’s my take. So far SoCal has been doing well because jobs are plenty there. But one thing I think will happen…SoCal (specifically LA) will probably have a nasty downturn once defense spending decreases…a good portion of the SoCal’s economy depends on the defense industry still. I remember the 80’s downturn there all too well (I remember being in 7th grade and my MechDrawing teacher complaining that he got wiped out because he “invested” too much in real estate at the peak…At that time, everyone was buying real estate, just like in 2002…Even school grade teachers who were otherwise clueless about investing were “in the market”.)
San Diego use to be the same way from my understanding, although i believe over the past 10 years it’s sort of more diversified now. There’s still some defense exposure, but not quite the same level as i believe in the 80’s.
April 15, 2007 at 10:51 PM #50183AnonymousGuestThese foreclosure numbers on sdlookup.com are fascinating. I sorted by foreclosures and as of today the highest number of foreclosures in the county are in north Oceanside. Chula Vista zip codes hold 4 of the top 7 slots. Others at the top include Spring valley, Encanto and El Cajon. All these locations have a reputation of serving a lower income bracket. It’s no surprise the subprime mortgage market’s getting hammered.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.