- This topic has 27 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 6 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 14, 2017 at 5:25 AM #22342May 15, 2017 at 1:33 PM #806518sdsurferParticipant
I’ve often thought the same thing. I think it’s just more proof that people are lazy. I feel the same way about home staging. Sooo this furniture is here just to show me what the place will look like with furniture even through this is not my furniture?
May 15, 2017 at 1:38 PM #806519bewilderingParticipant“Property shall be purchased in its present As-Is condition with architectural plans & approvals.”
That is shocking. 700,000 added value in getting architectural plans & approvals?
If you check the old listing you can see how this property is right on top of 3 other neighbors.
http://skyvillagerealty.com/real-estate/idx/mls-160048914-781_e_solana_circle_solana_beach_ca_92075May 15, 2017 at 5:03 PM #806521AnonymousGuest[quote=profhoff]How are plans and approvals worth this much profit?[/quote]
Maybe the sellers have purchased a friend in the permitting office?
May 16, 2017 at 6:33 AM #806525profhoffParticipantHere’s another one. Paid $1.2m less than a year ago. Pay these guys around $600k more for the privilege of getting plans that aren’t approved yet!
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-170024645-1265_Rubenstein_Cardiff_CA_92007May 16, 2017 at 9:21 AM #806526FlyerInHiGuest[quote=harvey][quote=profhoff]How are plans and approvals worth this much profit?[/quote]
Maybe the sellers have purchased a friend in the permitting office?[/quote]
That’s a very good statement, Harvey. So incredibly corrupt, those offices.
The market is hot. I sold a place that needed permits and work. So whatever the market will bear.
May 16, 2017 at 11:42 AM #806529gzzParticipantIf there are variances granted and it is a coastal area needing CCC approval too, a single family home approval, plans and construction permit could be worth $300,000. There are thousands in city fees to get this far.
Of course usually it is just some blueprints and city staff inital approval for these dumb listings. I have never seen one sell. It might be like a renovation that the seller has an emotional need to recoup the cost of.
May 16, 2017 at 12:20 PM #806530sdsurferParticipantHere’s one that looks like it sold:
https://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/178-Range-St-92024/home/4059853
May 16, 2017 at 4:18 PM #806531gzzParticipantLooks like it sold for 1.0 and then 1.3 with about half of that increase due to increase in market prices over a little under 2 years.
May 19, 2017 at 3:04 AM #806566CA renterParticipant[quote=sdsurfer]Here’s one that looks like it sold:
https://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/178-Range-St-92024/home/4059853%5B/quote%5D
Nope, no bubble here!
[People are crazy!]
May 24, 2017 at 12:58 AM #806625profhoffParticipantThey are getting more brazen. This one was bought last spring. Buyer did nothing. Now they want hundreds of thousands more for the opportunity. No plans, no permits, n o nothing.
May 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM #806631gzzParticipantProfhoff, that is a flat 14000sf lot W of the 5. It is overpriced now but the sale price in 2016 was below market.
May 24, 2017 at 2:38 PM #806633AnonymousGuestIt’s an odd phenomenon but certainly not a clear indication of a general San Diego real-estate bubble.
May 24, 2017 at 5:39 PM #806634Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=harvey]It’s an odd phenomenon but certainly not a clear indication of a general San Diego real-estate bubble.[/quote]
Agreed. A “hot market” is not the same as a “bubble.” It depends on your definition of bubble, I guess… but via the definition I use and that I think is most commonplace, bubbles are pretty rare events.
The way I think of it is that bubbles have two defining features:
– Extreme overvaluation
– Widespread euphoria and overconfidence (and conversely, a complete lack of concern/dismissiveness towards risk)In this sense, the mid-2000s was a classic bubble. Valuation reached 3.5 standard deviations above historical median — just massive overvaluation. And we all remember how frothing-at-the-mouth bullish everyone was. Everyone knew you were a total idiot if you didn’t buy a house, dooming all your descendants to a lifetime of penury and servitude to the enlightened home owning class. (The more circumspect acknowledged that housing might just stop going up double digits every year, and might flatten out for a few years… that was about the closest you got to risk awareness).
Totally different now. Valuations are high for sure — but not at bubble levels. More coming on this soon, but they’d have to rise another 18% in excess of rents/incomes to hit the 2 standard deviation threshold that I’ve often referenced (with credit to Grantham/GMO). And 40% to hit the bubble peak. And that’s without accounting for the mitigating effect of low interest rates, which I do think is a real thing, should the rates stay low in the years to come.
As far as euphoria, I don’t see that either. Except maybe from gzz (I kid, I kid ;-). Seriously, there is nothing like the kind of hubris, self-delusion, and FOMO that was on display in the mid-aughts. In fact there is a lot of skepticism… and not just here on pigg.
So I declare this (still) not a bubble. It’s a hot market that has gotten pretty overpriced — that’s certainly a fact that all market participants should consider! But it’s something different than a bubble. And something a lot less scary, because that overvaluation can be worked off without things going to hell in a handbasket.
May 24, 2017 at 6:21 PM #806635spdrunParticipantThe crash was only scary for idiots who didn’t engage their brain before signing on the dotted line in 2005 to 2007.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.