- This topic has 175 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 11, 2010 at 7:34 AM #17554June 11, 2010 at 7:44 AM #562386scaredyclassicParticipant
i would add that personally, i don’t believe in explicitly controlling others, but instead in educating, persuading and relating tot hem. but that’s because I’m one of those highly liberal intellectual-types. But many lawyers do feel it is their mission to make people do their will; i betit’s more pervasive amongst real estate agents…
June 11, 2010 at 7:44 AM #562482scaredyclassicParticipanti would add that personally, i don’t believe in explicitly controlling others, but instead in educating, persuading and relating tot hem. but that’s because I’m one of those highly liberal intellectual-types. But many lawyers do feel it is their mission to make people do their will; i betit’s more pervasive amongst real estate agents…
June 11, 2010 at 7:44 AM #562988scaredyclassicParticipanti would add that personally, i don’t believe in explicitly controlling others, but instead in educating, persuading and relating tot hem. but that’s because I’m one of those highly liberal intellectual-types. But many lawyers do feel it is their mission to make people do their will; i betit’s more pervasive amongst real estate agents…
June 11, 2010 at 7:44 AM #563095scaredyclassicParticipanti would add that personally, i don’t believe in explicitly controlling others, but instead in educating, persuading and relating tot hem. but that’s because I’m one of those highly liberal intellectual-types. But many lawyers do feel it is their mission to make people do their will; i betit’s more pervasive amongst real estate agents…
June 11, 2010 at 7:44 AM #563383scaredyclassicParticipanti would add that personally, i don’t believe in explicitly controlling others, but instead in educating, persuading and relating tot hem. but that’s because I’m one of those highly liberal intellectual-types. But many lawyers do feel it is their mission to make people do their will; i betit’s more pervasive amongst real estate agents…
June 11, 2010 at 7:55 AM #562391jpinpbParticipantI wouldn’t say “control,” but I can see them talking about persuading, whether seller or buyer. The realtors have an interest to earn income. Everyone does have an interest in it, so trying to reach a closing would benefit all. If one party is stubborn or reluctant, then I can see the realtors trying to work at convincing the resistant one. But honestly, I don’t see too much “controlling” or strong arming. Still competitive out here. Why waste their energy. They can find someone else.
June 11, 2010 at 7:55 AM #562487jpinpbParticipantI wouldn’t say “control,” but I can see them talking about persuading, whether seller or buyer. The realtors have an interest to earn income. Everyone does have an interest in it, so trying to reach a closing would benefit all. If one party is stubborn or reluctant, then I can see the realtors trying to work at convincing the resistant one. But honestly, I don’t see too much “controlling” or strong arming. Still competitive out here. Why waste their energy. They can find someone else.
June 11, 2010 at 7:55 AM #562993jpinpbParticipantI wouldn’t say “control,” but I can see them talking about persuading, whether seller or buyer. The realtors have an interest to earn income. Everyone does have an interest in it, so trying to reach a closing would benefit all. If one party is stubborn or reluctant, then I can see the realtors trying to work at convincing the resistant one. But honestly, I don’t see too much “controlling” or strong arming. Still competitive out here. Why waste their energy. They can find someone else.
June 11, 2010 at 7:55 AM #563100jpinpbParticipantI wouldn’t say “control,” but I can see them talking about persuading, whether seller or buyer. The realtors have an interest to earn income. Everyone does have an interest in it, so trying to reach a closing would benefit all. If one party is stubborn or reluctant, then I can see the realtors trying to work at convincing the resistant one. But honestly, I don’t see too much “controlling” or strong arming. Still competitive out here. Why waste their energy. They can find someone else.
June 11, 2010 at 7:55 AM #563388jpinpbParticipantI wouldn’t say “control,” but I can see them talking about persuading, whether seller or buyer. The realtors have an interest to earn income. Everyone does have an interest in it, so trying to reach a closing would benefit all. If one party is stubborn or reluctant, then I can see the realtors trying to work at convincing the resistant one. But honestly, I don’t see too much “controlling” or strong arming. Still competitive out here. Why waste their energy. They can find someone else.
June 11, 2010 at 9:39 AM #562469bearishgurlParticipantI have refused to work with buyers that have run amok and/or will not sign a Buyer/Broker agency agreement with me. I would typically use my extensive RE knowledge and intimate knowledge of particular areas and tracts to assist them in getting the best deal and likewise, I insist on loyalty to me.
In short, I will not tolerate wayward buyers and will not work with them.
A few of the very established agents around me will not list a property unless the seller signs an agreement that they will use the agent’s cleaning/staging company to stage the property first because most sellers have an “emotional investment” in too much stuff (and think everyone else wants to look at it, too. The banks are cleaning and rehabbing their cosmetic fixers as fierce competition, causing these agents to control their sellers more these days.
Pithy-scaredy, I have personally seen several established lawyers drop clients who do things to piss off judges when they have already been warned and also unmotivated or apathetic clients who will not hold up their end to help themselves or mitigate their own damages, even if they are paying clients.
I don’t blame them for doing so as the aggravation in dealing with a recalcitrant client over an extended period of time is not really worth the money.
June 11, 2010 at 9:39 AM #562567bearishgurlParticipantI have refused to work with buyers that have run amok and/or will not sign a Buyer/Broker agency agreement with me. I would typically use my extensive RE knowledge and intimate knowledge of particular areas and tracts to assist them in getting the best deal and likewise, I insist on loyalty to me.
In short, I will not tolerate wayward buyers and will not work with them.
A few of the very established agents around me will not list a property unless the seller signs an agreement that they will use the agent’s cleaning/staging company to stage the property first because most sellers have an “emotional investment” in too much stuff (and think everyone else wants to look at it, too. The banks are cleaning and rehabbing their cosmetic fixers as fierce competition, causing these agents to control their sellers more these days.
Pithy-scaredy, I have personally seen several established lawyers drop clients who do things to piss off judges when they have already been warned and also unmotivated or apathetic clients who will not hold up their end to help themselves or mitigate their own damages, even if they are paying clients.
I don’t blame them for doing so as the aggravation in dealing with a recalcitrant client over an extended period of time is not really worth the money.
June 11, 2010 at 9:39 AM #563073bearishgurlParticipantI have refused to work with buyers that have run amok and/or will not sign a Buyer/Broker agency agreement with me. I would typically use my extensive RE knowledge and intimate knowledge of particular areas and tracts to assist them in getting the best deal and likewise, I insist on loyalty to me.
In short, I will not tolerate wayward buyers and will not work with them.
A few of the very established agents around me will not list a property unless the seller signs an agreement that they will use the agent’s cleaning/staging company to stage the property first because most sellers have an “emotional investment” in too much stuff (and think everyone else wants to look at it, too. The banks are cleaning and rehabbing their cosmetic fixers as fierce competition, causing these agents to control their sellers more these days.
Pithy-scaredy, I have personally seen several established lawyers drop clients who do things to piss off judges when they have already been warned and also unmotivated or apathetic clients who will not hold up their end to help themselves or mitigate their own damages, even if they are paying clients.
I don’t blame them for doing so as the aggravation in dealing with a recalcitrant client over an extended period of time is not really worth the money.
June 11, 2010 at 9:39 AM #563181bearishgurlParticipantI have refused to work with buyers that have run amok and/or will not sign a Buyer/Broker agency agreement with me. I would typically use my extensive RE knowledge and intimate knowledge of particular areas and tracts to assist them in getting the best deal and likewise, I insist on loyalty to me.
In short, I will not tolerate wayward buyers and will not work with them.
A few of the very established agents around me will not list a property unless the seller signs an agreement that they will use the agent’s cleaning/staging company to stage the property first because most sellers have an “emotional investment” in too much stuff (and think everyone else wants to look at it, too. The banks are cleaning and rehabbing their cosmetic fixers as fierce competition, causing these agents to control their sellers more these days.
Pithy-scaredy, I have personally seen several established lawyers drop clients who do things to piss off judges when they have already been warned and also unmotivated or apathetic clients who will not hold up their end to help themselves or mitigate their own damages, even if they are paying clients.
I don’t blame them for doing so as the aggravation in dealing with a recalcitrant client over an extended period of time is not really worth the money.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.