- This topic has 65 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM #17334April 11, 2010 at 2:20 PM #538179
AK
ParticipantI always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”
April 11, 2010 at 2:20 PM #538769ParticipantI always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”
April 11, 2010 at 2:20 PM #538865ParticipantI always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”
April 11, 2010 at 2:20 PM #539131ParticipantI always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”
April 11, 2010 at 2:20 PM #538301ParticipantI always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”
April 11, 2010 at 2:37 PM #538321NotCranky
Participant[quote=AK]I always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”[/quote]
I figure it was a joke about how expensive San Diego real estate is and perhaps about how most are mortgaged pretty heavily for it too.April 11, 2010 at 2:37 PM #539151Participant[quote=AK]I always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”[/quote]
I figure it was a joke about how expensive San Diego real estate is and perhaps about how most are mortgaged pretty heavily for it too.April 11, 2010 at 2:37 PM #538885Participant[quote=AK]I always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”[/quote]
I figure it was a joke about how expensive San Diego real estate is and perhaps about how most are mortgaged pretty heavily for it too.April 11, 2010 at 2:37 PM #538199Participant[quote=AK]I always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”[/quote]
I figure it was a joke about how expensive San Diego real estate is and perhaps about how most are mortgaged pretty heavily for it too.April 11, 2010 at 2:37 PM #538790Participant[quote=AK]I always figured it was a word play on “landed gentry”[/quote]
I figure it was a joke about how expensive San Diego real estate is and perhaps about how most are mortgaged pretty heavily for it too.April 11, 2010 at 3:56 PM #538331
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=scaredycat]Not sure. I ran it through google but it’s not a commonly used term….[/quote]
It was less about being particularly meaningful than fitting in well with the antiquated faux-Victorian language I employed a lot when I started the site (per the faq: http://piggington.com/frequently_asked_questions) IE, if it were commonly used in the modern era I wouldn’t have used it myself. As for the definition, it’s pretty much what it sounds like.
Rich
April 11, 2010 at 3:56 PM #539161Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=scaredycat]Not sure. I ran it through google but it’s not a commonly used term….[/quote]
It was less about being particularly meaningful than fitting in well with the antiquated faux-Victorian language I employed a lot when I started the site (per the faq: http://piggington.com/frequently_asked_questions) IE, if it were commonly used in the modern era I wouldn’t have used it myself. As for the definition, it’s pretty much what it sounds like.
Rich
April 11, 2010 at 3:56 PM #538209Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=scaredycat]Not sure. I ran it through google but it’s not a commonly used term….[/quote]
It was less about being particularly meaningful than fitting in well with the antiquated faux-Victorian language I employed a lot when I started the site (per the faq: http://piggington.com/frequently_asked_questions) IE, if it were commonly used in the modern era I wouldn’t have used it myself. As for the definition, it’s pretty much what it sounds like.
Rich
April 11, 2010 at 3:56 PM #538895Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=scaredycat]Not sure. I ran it through google but it’s not a commonly used term….[/quote]
It was less about being particularly meaningful than fitting in well with the antiquated faux-Victorian language I employed a lot when I started the site (per the faq: http://piggington.com/frequently_asked_questions) IE, if it were commonly used in the modern era I wouldn’t have used it myself. As for the definition, it’s pretty much what it sounds like.
Rich
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.