- This topic has 185 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 18, 2009 at 9:44 PM #16515October 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM #470593
bsrsharma
ParticipantI think that sign is funny and should be kept in good repair.
What is probably more obnoxious is that there is a Justice of Peace in New Orleans, Louisiana, a real Homo Sapiens in flesh and blood, who refuses to marry interracial couple. Now that is an obnoxious old sign as bad as the old “Colored” bathroom signs.
October 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM #470778ParticipantI think that sign is funny and should be kept in good repair.
What is probably more obnoxious is that there is a Justice of Peace in New Orleans, Louisiana, a real Homo Sapiens in flesh and blood, who refuses to marry interracial couple. Now that is an obnoxious old sign as bad as the old “Colored” bathroom signs.
October 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM #471133ParticipantI think that sign is funny and should be kept in good repair.
What is probably more obnoxious is that there is a Justice of Peace in New Orleans, Louisiana, a real Homo Sapiens in flesh and blood, who refuses to marry interracial couple. Now that is an obnoxious old sign as bad as the old “Colored” bathroom signs.
October 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM #471208ParticipantI think that sign is funny and should be kept in good repair.
What is probably more obnoxious is that there is a Justice of Peace in New Orleans, Louisiana, a real Homo Sapiens in flesh and blood, who refuses to marry interracial couple. Now that is an obnoxious old sign as bad as the old “Colored” bathroom signs.
October 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM #471428ParticipantI think that sign is funny and should be kept in good repair.
What is probably more obnoxious is that there is a Justice of Peace in New Orleans, Louisiana, a real Homo Sapiens in flesh and blood, who refuses to marry interracial couple. Now that is an obnoxious old sign as bad as the old “Colored” bathroom signs.
October 18, 2009 at 10:31 PM #470599scaredyclassic
Participanti can see the humor in it. but i was looking at it more from the perspective of the sign poster. the sign is obnoxious, slightly condescending, and implies that the poster is smart while dissenters are dumb. After the sign poster is shown to be really, profoundly wrong, you’d think the kind of person who would’ve posted the sign would pull it down. but maybe not. dumb sign.
October 18, 2009 at 10:31 PM #470783Participanti can see the humor in it. but i was looking at it more from the perspective of the sign poster. the sign is obnoxious, slightly condescending, and implies that the poster is smart while dissenters are dumb. After the sign poster is shown to be really, profoundly wrong, you’d think the kind of person who would’ve posted the sign would pull it down. but maybe not. dumb sign.
October 18, 2009 at 10:31 PM #471139Participanti can see the humor in it. but i was looking at it more from the perspective of the sign poster. the sign is obnoxious, slightly condescending, and implies that the poster is smart while dissenters are dumb. After the sign poster is shown to be really, profoundly wrong, you’d think the kind of person who would’ve posted the sign would pull it down. but maybe not. dumb sign.
October 18, 2009 at 10:31 PM #471213Participanti can see the humor in it. but i was looking at it more from the perspective of the sign poster. the sign is obnoxious, slightly condescending, and implies that the poster is smart while dissenters are dumb. After the sign poster is shown to be really, profoundly wrong, you’d think the kind of person who would’ve posted the sign would pull it down. but maybe not. dumb sign.
October 18, 2009 at 10:31 PM #471433Participanti can see the humor in it. but i was looking at it more from the perspective of the sign poster. the sign is obnoxious, slightly condescending, and implies that the poster is smart while dissenters are dumb. After the sign poster is shown to be really, profoundly wrong, you’d think the kind of person who would’ve posted the sign would pull it down. but maybe not. dumb sign.
October 18, 2009 at 10:56 PM #470609[email protected]
ParticipantI don’t find the sign even slightly obnoxious because in the end, over the long haul, the sign has been correct for about 230 years.
October 18, 2009 at 10:56 PM #470793ParticipantI don’t find the sign even slightly obnoxious because in the end, over the long haul, the sign has been correct for about 230 years.
October 18, 2009 at 10:56 PM #471149ParticipantI don’t find the sign even slightly obnoxious because in the end, over the long haul, the sign has been correct for about 230 years.
October 18, 2009 at 10:56 PM #471223ParticipantI don’t find the sign even slightly obnoxious because in the end, over the long haul, the sign has been correct for about 230 years.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.