- This topic has 135 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 26, 2009 at 10:14 PM #16404September 27, 2009 at 12:37 AM #461469scaredyclassicParticipant
ok, this bugs me, because while i am willing to not buy at the absolute bototm, i want to buy near the bottom, like int he vicinity of the bottom. this kidn fo bs strikes me as (1) historically unprecedented on this scale and (2) bad for the future of housing price predictability. like, i have no ehtical problem with gaming the system, but ultimately, if gaming the system goes absolutely mainstream, the system is screwed, isn’t it? somebody ahs to do the honorable thing. it’s like everyone’s caught on…what doe sall this mean?
September 27, 2009 at 12:37 AM #461664scaredyclassicParticipantok, this bugs me, because while i am willing to not buy at the absolute bototm, i want to buy near the bottom, like int he vicinity of the bottom. this kidn fo bs strikes me as (1) historically unprecedented on this scale and (2) bad for the future of housing price predictability. like, i have no ehtical problem with gaming the system, but ultimately, if gaming the system goes absolutely mainstream, the system is screwed, isn’t it? somebody ahs to do the honorable thing. it’s like everyone’s caught on…what doe sall this mean?
September 27, 2009 at 12:37 AM #462006scaredyclassicParticipantok, this bugs me, because while i am willing to not buy at the absolute bototm, i want to buy near the bottom, like int he vicinity of the bottom. this kidn fo bs strikes me as (1) historically unprecedented on this scale and (2) bad for the future of housing price predictability. like, i have no ehtical problem with gaming the system, but ultimately, if gaming the system goes absolutely mainstream, the system is screwed, isn’t it? somebody ahs to do the honorable thing. it’s like everyone’s caught on…what doe sall this mean?
September 27, 2009 at 12:37 AM #462080scaredyclassicParticipantok, this bugs me, because while i am willing to not buy at the absolute bototm, i want to buy near the bottom, like int he vicinity of the bottom. this kidn fo bs strikes me as (1) historically unprecedented on this scale and (2) bad for the future of housing price predictability. like, i have no ehtical problem with gaming the system, but ultimately, if gaming the system goes absolutely mainstream, the system is screwed, isn’t it? somebody ahs to do the honorable thing. it’s like everyone’s caught on…what doe sall this mean?
September 27, 2009 at 12:37 AM #462284scaredyclassicParticipantok, this bugs me, because while i am willing to not buy at the absolute bototm, i want to buy near the bottom, like int he vicinity of the bottom. this kidn fo bs strikes me as (1) historically unprecedented on this scale and (2) bad for the future of housing price predictability. like, i have no ehtical problem with gaming the system, but ultimately, if gaming the system goes absolutely mainstream, the system is screwed, isn’t it? somebody ahs to do the honorable thing. it’s like everyone’s caught on…what doe sall this mean?
September 27, 2009 at 7:11 AM #461494EconProfParticipantThis has to be the ticking time bomb that keeps bankers awake at night: middle-class, underwater homeowners who rationally weigh the pros and cons of default, including the increasing time period they can stay in their home rent-free and mortgage payment-free, and conclude, “Yeah, I’m going to simply stop paying and live on cash instead of credit.”
September 27, 2009 at 7:11 AM #461689EconProfParticipantThis has to be the ticking time bomb that keeps bankers awake at night: middle-class, underwater homeowners who rationally weigh the pros and cons of default, including the increasing time period they can stay in their home rent-free and mortgage payment-free, and conclude, “Yeah, I’m going to simply stop paying and live on cash instead of credit.”
September 27, 2009 at 7:11 AM #462031EconProfParticipantThis has to be the ticking time bomb that keeps bankers awake at night: middle-class, underwater homeowners who rationally weigh the pros and cons of default, including the increasing time period they can stay in their home rent-free and mortgage payment-free, and conclude, “Yeah, I’m going to simply stop paying and live on cash instead of credit.”
September 27, 2009 at 7:11 AM #462105EconProfParticipantThis has to be the ticking time bomb that keeps bankers awake at night: middle-class, underwater homeowners who rationally weigh the pros and cons of default, including the increasing time period they can stay in their home rent-free and mortgage payment-free, and conclude, “Yeah, I’m going to simply stop paying and live on cash instead of credit.”
September 27, 2009 at 7:11 AM #462309EconProfParticipantThis has to be the ticking time bomb that keeps bankers awake at night: middle-class, underwater homeowners who rationally weigh the pros and cons of default, including the increasing time period they can stay in their home rent-free and mortgage payment-free, and conclude, “Yeah, I’m going to simply stop paying and live on cash instead of credit.”
September 27, 2009 at 7:30 AM #461504kicksavedaveParticipantWell some people are doing the right thing. I have a buddy who is hopelessly upside down on a townhouse in San Marcos, he’s locked into a 9 % fixed rate, paying about $4500/mo for a 2 BR townhouse, and he now has two kids. But he refuses to “strategically walk away” like these people in the article. I have another friend who had to put $45K on her credit cards to get out of an upside down flip in Florida. She’s making her payments despite great inconvenience, because she feels is the only moral thing to do.
So not everyone is a deadbeat these days, but the percentage who are, is clearly growing and effecting the overall market somewhat.
September 27, 2009 at 7:30 AM #461699kicksavedaveParticipantWell some people are doing the right thing. I have a buddy who is hopelessly upside down on a townhouse in San Marcos, he’s locked into a 9 % fixed rate, paying about $4500/mo for a 2 BR townhouse, and he now has two kids. But he refuses to “strategically walk away” like these people in the article. I have another friend who had to put $45K on her credit cards to get out of an upside down flip in Florida. She’s making her payments despite great inconvenience, because she feels is the only moral thing to do.
So not everyone is a deadbeat these days, but the percentage who are, is clearly growing and effecting the overall market somewhat.
September 27, 2009 at 7:30 AM #462041kicksavedaveParticipantWell some people are doing the right thing. I have a buddy who is hopelessly upside down on a townhouse in San Marcos, he’s locked into a 9 % fixed rate, paying about $4500/mo for a 2 BR townhouse, and he now has two kids. But he refuses to “strategically walk away” like these people in the article. I have another friend who had to put $45K on her credit cards to get out of an upside down flip in Florida. She’s making her payments despite great inconvenience, because she feels is the only moral thing to do.
So not everyone is a deadbeat these days, but the percentage who are, is clearly growing and effecting the overall market somewhat.
September 27, 2009 at 7:30 AM #462115kicksavedaveParticipantWell some people are doing the right thing. I have a buddy who is hopelessly upside down on a townhouse in San Marcos, he’s locked into a 9 % fixed rate, paying about $4500/mo for a 2 BR townhouse, and he now has two kids. But he refuses to “strategically walk away” like these people in the article. I have another friend who had to put $45K on her credit cards to get out of an upside down flip in Florida. She’s making her payments despite great inconvenience, because she feels is the only moral thing to do.
So not everyone is a deadbeat these days, but the percentage who are, is clearly growing and effecting the overall market somewhat.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.