Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › Murrieta better than temecula

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 91 total)
1 2 3 … 5 6 7
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 2, 2009 at 11:33 AM #15593
    scaredyclassic
    Participant

    I wanted to know where this general sense that temecula is the “good” place to live and murrieta is the cheap, lousy alternative came from? the reason i ask is several years ago i remmeber shopping prices and i recall the emdian sales price being higher in murrieta than in temecula. i also remember at least one real estate agent selling murrieta as more “upscale” than temecula. no particular reason the agent said that, other than the house wa sin murrieta, but I don’t remember ever being told murrieta is dumpy compared to temecula. now it might very well be, but what actual difference is there? and does anyone else remember prices being higher in murrieta than temecula? maybe it was because murrieta had more new stock than temecula, so the prices were higher?

    May 2, 2009 at 12:47 PM #391754
    Ren
    Participant

    Murrieta is built over a Hell Mouth. Rampant vampires and demons.

    Besides that, I think the reason it’s cheaper is because the commute to SD is almost reasonable from south Temecula, but from Murrieta it’s out of the question.

    I don’t know enough about the areas to know if one is “nicer” than the other. I think the weather is a little more mild in Temecula.

    May 2, 2009 at 12:47 PM #392421
    Ren
    Participant

    Murrieta is built over a Hell Mouth. Rampant vampires and demons.

    Besides that, I think the reason it’s cheaper is because the commute to SD is almost reasonable from south Temecula, but from Murrieta it’s out of the question.

    I don’t know enough about the areas to know if one is “nicer” than the other. I think the weather is a little more mild in Temecula.

    May 2, 2009 at 12:47 PM #392017
    Ren
    Participant

    Murrieta is built over a Hell Mouth. Rampant vampires and demons.

    Besides that, I think the reason it’s cheaper is because the commute to SD is almost reasonable from south Temecula, but from Murrieta it’s out of the question.

    I don’t know enough about the areas to know if one is “nicer” than the other. I think the weather is a little more mild in Temecula.

    May 2, 2009 at 12:47 PM #392280
    Ren
    Participant

    Murrieta is built over a Hell Mouth. Rampant vampires and demons.

    Besides that, I think the reason it’s cheaper is because the commute to SD is almost reasonable from south Temecula, but from Murrieta it’s out of the question.

    I don’t know enough about the areas to know if one is “nicer” than the other. I think the weather is a little more mild in Temecula.

    May 2, 2009 at 12:47 PM #392229
    Ren
    Participant

    Murrieta is built over a Hell Mouth. Rampant vampires and demons.

    Besides that, I think the reason it’s cheaper is because the commute to SD is almost reasonable from south Temecula, but from Murrieta it’s out of the question.

    I don’t know enough about the areas to know if one is “nicer” than the other. I think the weather is a little more mild in Temecula.

    May 2, 2009 at 7:55 PM #392424
    ocrenter
    Participant

    On paper, statistically speaking, they are essentially the same, I included Carlsbad in the comparison just to make it interesting. south Temecula is desired for SD commuters. otherwise it really just depends on the subdivision.

    Estimated median household income in 2007:
    Murrieta: $78,883
    Temecula: $71,975
    Carlsbad: $79,444

    Estimated median house or condo value in 2007:
    Murrieta: $459,300
    Temecula: $468,000
    Carlsbad: $690,600

    Median gross rent in 2007:
    Murrieta: $1,320
    Temecula: $1,308
    Carlsbad: $1,386

    Percentage of residents living in poverty in 2007:
    Murrieta: 4.4%
    Temecula: 7.8%
    Carlsbad: 5.9%

    May 2, 2009 at 7:55 PM #392476
    ocrenter
    Participant

    On paper, statistically speaking, they are essentially the same, I included Carlsbad in the comparison just to make it interesting. south Temecula is desired for SD commuters. otherwise it really just depends on the subdivision.

    Estimated median household income in 2007:
    Murrieta: $78,883
    Temecula: $71,975
    Carlsbad: $79,444

    Estimated median house or condo value in 2007:
    Murrieta: $459,300
    Temecula: $468,000
    Carlsbad: $690,600

    Median gross rent in 2007:
    Murrieta: $1,320
    Temecula: $1,308
    Carlsbad: $1,386

    Percentage of residents living in poverty in 2007:
    Murrieta: 4.4%
    Temecula: 7.8%
    Carlsbad: 5.9%

    May 2, 2009 at 7:55 PM #392212
    ocrenter
    Participant

    On paper, statistically speaking, they are essentially the same, I included Carlsbad in the comparison just to make it interesting. south Temecula is desired for SD commuters. otherwise it really just depends on the subdivision.

    Estimated median household income in 2007:
    Murrieta: $78,883
    Temecula: $71,975
    Carlsbad: $79,444

    Estimated median house or condo value in 2007:
    Murrieta: $459,300
    Temecula: $468,000
    Carlsbad: $690,600

    Median gross rent in 2007:
    Murrieta: $1,320
    Temecula: $1,308
    Carlsbad: $1,386

    Percentage of residents living in poverty in 2007:
    Murrieta: 4.4%
    Temecula: 7.8%
    Carlsbad: 5.9%

    May 2, 2009 at 7:55 PM #392617
    ocrenter
    Participant

    On paper, statistically speaking, they are essentially the same, I included Carlsbad in the comparison just to make it interesting. south Temecula is desired for SD commuters. otherwise it really just depends on the subdivision.

    Estimated median household income in 2007:
    Murrieta: $78,883
    Temecula: $71,975
    Carlsbad: $79,444

    Estimated median house or condo value in 2007:
    Murrieta: $459,300
    Temecula: $468,000
    Carlsbad: $690,600

    Median gross rent in 2007:
    Murrieta: $1,320
    Temecula: $1,308
    Carlsbad: $1,386

    Percentage of residents living in poverty in 2007:
    Murrieta: 4.4%
    Temecula: 7.8%
    Carlsbad: 5.9%

    May 2, 2009 at 7:55 PM #391949
    ocrenter
    Participant

    On paper, statistically speaking, they are essentially the same, I included Carlsbad in the comparison just to make it interesting. south Temecula is desired for SD commuters. otherwise it really just depends on the subdivision.

    Estimated median household income in 2007:
    Murrieta: $78,883
    Temecula: $71,975
    Carlsbad: $79,444

    Estimated median house or condo value in 2007:
    Murrieta: $459,300
    Temecula: $468,000
    Carlsbad: $690,600

    Median gross rent in 2007:
    Murrieta: $1,320
    Temecula: $1,308
    Carlsbad: $1,386

    Percentage of residents living in poverty in 2007:
    Murrieta: 4.4%
    Temecula: 7.8%
    Carlsbad: 5.9%

    May 2, 2009 at 8:06 PM #392217
    paramount
    Participant

    Murrieta has a higher concentration of rednecks – don’t get me wrong, there are plenty in Temecula as well.

    Murrieta is a bit more blue collar than Temecula IMO.

    May 2, 2009 at 8:06 PM #392622
    paramount
    Participant

    Murrieta has a higher concentration of rednecks – don’t get me wrong, there are plenty in Temecula as well.

    Murrieta is a bit more blue collar than Temecula IMO.

    May 2, 2009 at 8:06 PM #392481
    paramount
    Participant

    Murrieta has a higher concentration of rednecks – don’t get me wrong, there are plenty in Temecula as well.

    Murrieta is a bit more blue collar than Temecula IMO.

    May 2, 2009 at 8:06 PM #391954
    paramount
    Participant

    Murrieta has a higher concentration of rednecks – don’t get me wrong, there are plenty in Temecula as well.

    Murrieta is a bit more blue collar than Temecula IMO.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 91 total)
1 2 3 … 5 6 7
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.