Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Jobless claims continue – unemployment, housing woes increase
- This topic has 35 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2009 at 6:30 PM #15172February 26, 2009 at 6:33 PM #355807jpinpbParticipant
As far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household.
February 26, 2009 at 6:33 PM #356397jpinpbParticipantAs far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household.
February 26, 2009 at 6:33 PM #356119jpinpbParticipantAs far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household.
February 26, 2009 at 6:33 PM #356286jpinpbParticipantAs far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household.
February 26, 2009 at 6:33 PM #356258jpinpbParticipantAs far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household.
February 26, 2009 at 6:50 PM #356316partypupParticipant[quote=jpinpb]As far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household. [/quote]
In fact, the unemployment figure jumps to almost 16% if we include the categories of people you set forth above.
Check out the third chart down. It’s going parabolic…
February 26, 2009 at 6:50 PM #356427partypupParticipant[quote=jpinpb]As far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household. [/quote]
In fact, the unemployment figure jumps to almost 16% if we include the categories of people you set forth above.
Check out the third chart down. It’s going parabolic…
February 26, 2009 at 6:50 PM #356288partypupParticipant[quote=jpinpb]As far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household. [/quote]
In fact, the unemployment figure jumps to almost 16% if we include the categories of people you set forth above.
Check out the third chart down. It’s going parabolic…
February 26, 2009 at 6:50 PM #355837partypupParticipant[quote=jpinpb]As far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household. [/quote]
In fact, the unemployment figure jumps to almost 16% if we include the categories of people you set forth above.
Check out the third chart down. It’s going parabolic…
February 26, 2009 at 6:50 PM #356149partypupParticipant[quote=jpinpb]As far as unemployment goes, shouldn’t we also consider all those people not working who are prohibited from filing for unemployment? I think part-timers can’t, self-employed can’t, under-the-table can’t.
The unemployment figures are higher, for all intents and purposes, then. That’s also money not going into the economy and income missing from a household. [/quote]
In fact, the unemployment figure jumps to almost 16% if we include the categories of people you set forth above.
Check out the third chart down. It’s going parabolic…
February 26, 2009 at 6:55 PM #356437jpinpbParticipantThose are some ugly charts. When someone sees that, how in the world can they utter “bottom.”
February 26, 2009 at 6:55 PM #356159jpinpbParticipantThose are some ugly charts. When someone sees that, how in the world can they utter “bottom.”
February 26, 2009 at 6:55 PM #355848jpinpbParticipantThose are some ugly charts. When someone sees that, how in the world can they utter “bottom.”
February 26, 2009 at 6:55 PM #356298jpinpbParticipantThose are some ugly charts. When someone sees that, how in the world can they utter “bottom.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.