- This topic has 40 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by PadreBrian.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 23, 2008 at 6:34 AM #13385July 23, 2008 at 10:09 AM #245161crParticipant
This bill?
PEOPLE! Write your Senators and Representatives and tell them no!
If you want housing to correct and become affordable again for teachers, firemen, nurses, secretaries, mechanic’s and retail managers tell them to stop spending OUR money on people who bought houses they shouldn’t have!
July 23, 2008 at 10:09 AM #245379crParticipantThis bill?
PEOPLE! Write your Senators and Representatives and tell them no!
If you want housing to correct and become affordable again for teachers, firemen, nurses, secretaries, mechanic’s and retail managers tell them to stop spending OUR money on people who bought houses they shouldn’t have!
July 23, 2008 at 10:09 AM #245306crParticipantThis bill?
PEOPLE! Write your Senators and Representatives and tell them no!
If you want housing to correct and become affordable again for teachers, firemen, nurses, secretaries, mechanic’s and retail managers tell them to stop spending OUR money on people who bought houses they shouldn’t have!
July 23, 2008 at 10:09 AM #245314crParticipantThis bill?
PEOPLE! Write your Senators and Representatives and tell them no!
If you want housing to correct and become affordable again for teachers, firemen, nurses, secretaries, mechanic’s and retail managers tell them to stop spending OUR money on people who bought houses they shouldn’t have!
July 23, 2008 at 10:09 AM #245371crParticipantThis bill?
PEOPLE! Write your Senators and Representatives and tell them no!
If you want housing to correct and become affordable again for teachers, firemen, nurses, secretaries, mechanic’s and retail managers tell them to stop spending OUR money on people who bought houses they shouldn’t have!
July 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM #245338PadreBrianParticipantLOL! Don’t be so naive. Those congressmen aren’t paid by you, they are paid by lobbyists! They also don’t care where your money goes, whether it be Iraq…or fraudulent home loans, whatever. They are paid by wall-street to look the other way.
Bush is caving for the very same reasons.
July 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM #245404PadreBrianParticipantLOL! Don’t be so naive. Those congressmen aren’t paid by you, they are paid by lobbyists! They also don’t care where your money goes, whether it be Iraq…or fraudulent home loans, whatever. They are paid by wall-street to look the other way.
Bush is caving for the very same reasons.
July 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM #245395PadreBrianParticipantLOL! Don’t be so naive. Those congressmen aren’t paid by you, they are paid by lobbyists! They also don’t care where your money goes, whether it be Iraq…or fraudulent home loans, whatever. They are paid by wall-street to look the other way.
Bush is caving for the very same reasons.
July 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM #245329PadreBrianParticipantLOL! Don’t be so naive. Those congressmen aren’t paid by you, they are paid by lobbyists! They also don’t care where your money goes, whether it be Iraq…or fraudulent home loans, whatever. They are paid by wall-street to look the other way.
Bush is caving for the very same reasons.
July 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM #245184PadreBrianParticipantLOL! Don’t be so naive. Those congressmen aren’t paid by you, they are paid by lobbyists! They also don’t care where your money goes, whether it be Iraq…or fraudulent home loans, whatever. They are paid by wall-street to look the other way.
Bush is caving for the very same reasons.
July 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM #245339drunkleParticipantthis doesn’t seem like it’s going to save the housing market. more likely, it’s to save the agency bond market. and the cush jobs of the connected gse execs.
underwriting standards have gone up so the gse’s still can’t buy crap mortgages. the 625 cap sounds impressive, but with strong underwriting, who can afford that? buying and backing mortgages up to 15% above median will help the banks who wrote and cannot sell mbs, but 15% won’t cover the some 30% loss already taken. and selling the stuff will cause write downs that were previously avoided.
the hit to taxpayers to save the bond market, the money markets, the ib’s and cb’s should make certain folks happy. forcing the middle and lower income people share in the burden of bailing out the upper echelons.
personally, this bailout has made my decision for president for me; obama. at least his tax plan puts the burden of the bailouts back on the shoulders of where it belongs.
July 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM #245415drunkleParticipantthis doesn’t seem like it’s going to save the housing market. more likely, it’s to save the agency bond market. and the cush jobs of the connected gse execs.
underwriting standards have gone up so the gse’s still can’t buy crap mortgages. the 625 cap sounds impressive, but with strong underwriting, who can afford that? buying and backing mortgages up to 15% above median will help the banks who wrote and cannot sell mbs, but 15% won’t cover the some 30% loss already taken. and selling the stuff will cause write downs that were previously avoided.
the hit to taxpayers to save the bond market, the money markets, the ib’s and cb’s should make certain folks happy. forcing the middle and lower income people share in the burden of bailing out the upper echelons.
personally, this bailout has made my decision for president for me; obama. at least his tax plan puts the burden of the bailouts back on the shoulders of where it belongs.
July 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM #245349drunkleParticipantthis doesn’t seem like it’s going to save the housing market. more likely, it’s to save the agency bond market. and the cush jobs of the connected gse execs.
underwriting standards have gone up so the gse’s still can’t buy crap mortgages. the 625 cap sounds impressive, but with strong underwriting, who can afford that? buying and backing mortgages up to 15% above median will help the banks who wrote and cannot sell mbs, but 15% won’t cover the some 30% loss already taken. and selling the stuff will cause write downs that were previously avoided.
the hit to taxpayers to save the bond market, the money markets, the ib’s and cb’s should make certain folks happy. forcing the middle and lower income people share in the burden of bailing out the upper echelons.
personally, this bailout has made my decision for president for me; obama. at least his tax plan puts the burden of the bailouts back on the shoulders of where it belongs.
July 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM #245193drunkleParticipantthis doesn’t seem like it’s going to save the housing market. more likely, it’s to save the agency bond market. and the cush jobs of the connected gse execs.
underwriting standards have gone up so the gse’s still can’t buy crap mortgages. the 625 cap sounds impressive, but with strong underwriting, who can afford that? buying and backing mortgages up to 15% above median will help the banks who wrote and cannot sell mbs, but 15% won’t cover the some 30% loss already taken. and selling the stuff will cause write downs that were previously avoided.
the hit to taxpayers to save the bond market, the money markets, the ib’s and cb’s should make certain folks happy. forcing the middle and lower income people share in the burden of bailing out the upper echelons.
personally, this bailout has made my decision for president for me; obama. at least his tax plan puts the burden of the bailouts back on the shoulders of where it belongs.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.